Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
Barry Baxter - Chapter 2
October 23, 2024
post photo preview

Hello dear fellows and sheilas of the Locals community. Here is a little story I've been working on called Barry Baxter and the Magical Pygmy Possums

Please comment below so I know you've read it. If people are getting sick of these I'll stop.

Summary

Prologue 

Chapter 1


Chapter 2

Z put his hand to his head like he was gonna faint. Said he needed some fresh air. Poor bugger. Guess it’s not everyday you find out your best friend has super powers. “Here’s what I propose,” I said. “We go for a walk up to the shops; get a pie; some lollies, you know? Some Farmer’s Union.” Z looked up at me as if everything now depended on that. That if he could only get a little Farmer’s Union Iced Coffee into him, everything would be okay. “Come on you little rascal,” I said, “let’s go.” Z stood up, went to grab his wallet then we headed out the door.

Now, up the road from Z’s place you’ve got two and only two options when it comes to shops—if you’re walking, that is. A small one attached to a sort of dress/fabric shop. It’s run by a little old woman named Mrs. Binne, somewhat new to our town, who you never wanted to catch in a bad mood. The second is a little bigger, bit more of a walk, and is run by this old fat balding bloke named Kevin. Insufferable bastard, he is. He has this annoying habit of telling you things that everybody already agrees with but in a tone that suggested it’s controversial and that he’s something of a non-conformist. But, pain in the arse though he was, his meat pies are spectacular, so that’s where we headed. Along the way Z had 101 questions for me. But he wouldn’t pause long enough to let me answer: “how long have you had your powers?” “Why didn’t you tell me sooner?” “Are you part of some sort of group?” “Do you have an arch-nemesis?” “Is Barry your real name?” “Why haven’t you imagined yourself having a girlfriend yet?” Eventually, not being able to get a word in edgeways I just stopped walking and stood there while Z continued on without noticing. Eventually he turns around, looks at me and asks if I’m okay. “Mate,” I said, “first of all, I only discovered I had these abilities this arvo at the comic book store. Secondly, I’m gonna need you to calm yourself. Can you do that? Can you bring it down a notch?” Z said he could and took a few deep breaths while shaking his hands to prove it. Kept saying, “I’m cool, I’m cool, I’m cool.” I’m like, “are you though?” and he’s like “yeah, I’m cool.” I’m like,” then do you think you can stop saying that you’re cool because it’s freaking me out.” Then he was all like, “oh, no worries, you turn my TV into a potato chip, my friggin lamp into a gherkin and I’m freaking you out.” Just knew he was gonna throw that in my face.

“Look, I said, how about we go in there, get the food, go back to your place and I’ll answer every question you’ve got, and we can figure out what’s going on.” 

So, we go into the shop, get our stuff and bring it to Kevin at the counter. He was in bloody rare form that day. “Hey boys,” he says, “geeze, bloody hot enough out there for you?” Kevin is the king of banter. The champion of it. You could try to out banter him, but you would be unsuccessful. Your best bet was just to answer him as simply as possible and hope that he’d shut up and let you leave. “Yes, Kevin” I said, very matter of factly, “It is bloody hot enough out there for us.” “I always say,” he began, and I let out a groan, hoping he’d hear. “I always say, you can put stuff on to get warm but if it’s hot enough; doesn't matter how much you take off, you’re still bloody hot. You know what I’m saying?” That was the other thing he did that gave me the shits. After making some vacuous statement he’d raise his hands and ask if you knew what he was saying. And if you didn’t tell him that you did, he’d ask again. And again. Best just to get it over with. So I’m like, “Yes, Kevin” pointing to the food on the counter, hoping he’d start ringing us up, “we know what you’re saying.” 

That’s when Z spoke up, “How’s business, Kev?” Nearly killed him. Should’ve! Kevin’s like, “doing quite well, thanks, Zachery … I always say, if you’re good to people, they’ll be good to you.” and then he held up his hands like someone was pointing a gun at him and said, “that’s just me.” I was all like, “nah, mate, I don’t think that’s just you. Pretty sure it’s every person who has ever lived.” Kevin looked at me for a moment, wondering whether he should be offended and then looked back at Z. “Anyway,” he said, “I think that’s why we’re doing better than Mrs Binnie up the road there, just quietly.” He was like, “people want to be treated fairly, you know? They want good quality products for a good price.” I couldn’t take it anymore. I said, “people want good quality products for a good price you think?” “Yeah, mate,” he said, “people want good quality … you know? … that’s … that’s just something I’ve always thought.” and he held up his hands again. I sucked my top lip trying to restrain myself but couldn’t. And that’s when I imagined him without ears. Now, you already know where this is going but let me just back up a little here. You may be wondering why on earth I imagined him without ears. Surely imagining him without a mouth would have made more sense. It’s bloody crazy how our subconscious thoughts string together, isn’t it? There are times when someone will ask you, “what are you thinking about?” And it’s something super random like … I don’t know … like, why are humans the only ones who wipe their bums when they poo. … Okay, well, dogs and that wipe their bums on the grass and … so that’s not a good example, maybe, but you get my point. You’re thinking of something super random and you’ve got no idea how the hell it was that you started thinking about that thing. It’s as if it popped into your mind without any cognitive history. But, if you think real hard you can trace that thought back to something that triggered it. So here’s what happened: I thought, “this bloke’s talking my bloody ears off.” Right? And then I thought, “hey, how crazy would it be if you could actually talk someone’s ears off.” What would that look like? Be pretty bloody weird, wouldn’t it? Anyway, then I imagined what Kevin would look like with no ears.

My bad. 

Kevin winced as if he had a headache and then covered the sides of his head where his ears used to be, swore, and ran out the back. I put some money on the counter and called out to him, “keep the change” and off we went. Not sure if he heard me. I was pretty proud about that one, I have to say. “Keep the change,” I mean. Thought then that it might become my tagline, you know? Do something super cool and then be like, “keep the change.” Anyway, Z asked if we should help. I said no. He asked if I had anything to do with it. I said maybe, and told him to keep walking.

Back at Z’s house we sat out under his verandah and I told him everything I’ve told you up until now. About the bloody pigmy possum—which, by the by, he didn’t think was terribly remarkable—Said the same thing happened to him when he was a kid. And so he was highly doubtful that it was the pigmy possum that caused my super powers. I told him how I changed the colors of my shoes and how for some reason I couldn’t imagine into existence a scabbard for his replica of Sting. It was around that time that Z finished his iced coffee. He was like, “alright, mate. Put those powers to good use, will you, and imagine for me another Iced Coffee. I tried. I really did. I even put two fingers to my temples for effect and concentrated really hard. Nothing. I was a bit bummed about that, I have to say. Z was like, “alright well what about this Cherry Ripe, can you turn it into an Iced Coffee. I pretended I was a bit tired just in case it wasn’t going to work. But it did! His Cherry Ripe vanished and in the same moment a cold carton of Iced coffee appeared. Z gasped in amazement. He was like, “that’s amazing.” And I was like “mate, amazing’s my middle name.” Z was like, “I thought it was Terrance.” And I tried really hard not to imagine him without a face.

Anyway, so Z stands up and tells me to follow him into the lounge room where the chip and gherkin still lay. “It's a bit difficult to play Zelda on a chip, mate.” Z said. “Can you give me my lamp and telly back?” I was like, “child's play,” and winked at him. Within seconds the chip had turned back into a TV and the gherkin back into a lamp. They weren’t the same as before, however, which I remember thinking was weird. The TV was better, though, so there were no complaints.

After a quick spell playing Zelda, we spent the rest of that day trying out my new skills. Not just for fun, though it was pretty bloody fun. But to figure out all I could and couldn’t do. Z really tested my limits and we learnt a lot. At one point Z got all happy with himself and was like, “hey, I’m kinda like your coach. You should call me that. That can be my sidekick name, ‘coach’. Hey? What do you reckon?” I didn’t want to burst his bubble but I also didn’t want to lie to him. “Z,” I said. “I love you—not in gay way—but I love you and so I need you to know right now that I will never in a million years call you, coach.” Z stopped smiling. 

community logo
Join the Matt Fradd Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
7
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The Human Excellence that Technology Can Never Replace - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Squad, I've been thinking about AI lately. It's not that I understand the technology, though I am trying some, but that my limited understanding has given me occasion to think specifically about what is distinctive to the human person. And, it turns out, those distinctive notes are incredibly precious. In this video, I'm think about our call to conversation for intimacy . . . look forward to chatting with you there.

00:21:22
My Weird Thoughts on AI - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

We're in a golden age of artificial intelligence, but it's already begun to raise interesting ethical questions. What is it doing to my agency? What is it doing to my projects? I'm no expert, but I've thought about it a little bit. Here are my thoughts . . .

00:20:38
We Have a Pope + An Announcement! - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

A lot of us were simultaneously looking forward to and getting super anxious about the conclave. Why exactly is that? Is this just like a political election and we're nervous until our candidate wins? How are we supposed to think about our ecclesial life in these times and how should our ecclesial thinking differ from our political thinking? Ooo, plus a fun little announcement : )

00:19:10
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

Hello Pints family! If you can offer a rosary or any prayers for my wife and unborn child as well as all expecting mothers and unborn children. She is in labor now. Many thanks and may God bless all of you. Glory to Jesus Christ!

Can I ask for a prayer?

This morning my little sister, 30 years old, passed away in childbirth in a hospital in SLC, leaving her husband, my nephew, and my family behind. She had a medical condition and refused doctors’ advice to have an abortion, intent on being a mother. She got to hold my nephew for a short moment before she passed.

I’m still in shock and don’t really know how I should feel, or can feel. She was young and I don’t think had life insurance, and it’s not clear who’s even going to be able to raise my nephew. I want to help but have no idea how to. Prayers are very appreciated.

I don’t know why it’s become my thing to post my wife’s iconography progress a session or two before she’s actually finished, but why break the habit? She’s almost there now—just the gold leaf, the inscription, and a few final highlights to go.

Divine Mercy has a deep place in our story. Years ago, after being away from the Church longer than we’d care to admit, this devotion drew us back—not just emotionally, but sacramentally. We made our confession on Divine Mercy Sunday and firmly resolved to begin the work of making our relationship right in the eyes of the Church. That moment wasn’t just a return, it was a re-rooting in the rays of mercy and we haven’t looked back since.

I’ve always seen Divine Mercy as a kind of bridge. The revelations to St. Faustina came in Poland and Lithuania, where Latin and Byzantine traditions have long kissed. The geography reflects the devotion: tender, radiant, deeply Christ-centered, with an undercurrent of silence and mystery.

...

post photo preview
post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Life is very, very simple, actually.

There is a lot going on. We are confused about many things. Embarrassed that we are confused. Pretend not to be. Have a few soundbites we can rely on when the conversation turns to Trump or the state of the Church or what is going on in Israel and Gaza or the AI revolution. We hope they don’t press us because we know enough to answer two or three questions before they will hit bedrock and we will have nothing.

All of this can lead us to believe the lie that life is complicated. And since we cannot figure it out, we should either quit, or numb, or pretend, or run ourselves ragged trying to understand everything we think we should understand.

And yet life is simple. Very, very simple. There is very little to figure out.

Love what is good. Hate what is evil. But how? When I have willingly habituated myself to do the opposite. Pray. Repent. Keep turning away from distractions. Don’t hate yourself for failing. Hope in the good God who is better than you think He is. Who cares for you more than you think He does.

What are your duties? Do them with joy and attention. Don’t hate yourself when you fail at this. Pray. Repent. Have a sense of humor about your littleness. You are incredibly loved after all, remember?

Turn away from what is useless and petty and vulgar and think about what is excellent.

Say “Your will be done” 100 times a day, especially when things are bad or seem meaningless. Your headache. Your bad night sleep. The house you can’t seem to get around to tidying.

Be patient and gentle with stupid people who can’t seem to make themselves love or want to love what is good, yourself first and foremost.

Jesus, help me want to want to love you. Help me want to want to hate anything opposed to you or your kingdom.

Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
Read full Article
post photo preview
Is Knowledge Possible (No ... And Yes)

I want to begin by admitting that I’m an amateur when it comes to epistemology. I do have a master’s degree in philosophy, but epistemology wasn’t my area of focus. Some of you reading this will know more about the subject than I do. And to be honest, I’m a little nervous about the comments. There’s a good chance that if you engage with what I’m about to say in any real depth, I won’t understand you and it will be my fault that I don’t.

Okay, with that admission out of the way…

 

We've long assumed that knowledge requires three criteria: (1) belief, (2) truth, and (3) justification. In other words, to know something is to believe it, for it to be true, and to have good reason for believing it. That’s the classical definition: justified true belief (JTB).

And just real quick, if you’re wondering why knowledge can’t be defined by just the first two criteria, it’s because believing something that happens to be true is more like getting lucky than knowledge. Imagine I say it’s raining in Adelaide, but I have no reason for thinking so. I didn’t check my weather app or ask anyone who lives there. If it turns out that it is raining, I was right, but only by chance. That’s not knowledge. To genuinely know something, you need more than belief and truth, you need a reason for thinking it’s true. You need justification.

Okay …

Along Comes Gettier

Now, for a long time, this three-part definition held up well. But then, in 1963, Edmund Gettier came along and broke everything in three pages. You can read that paper here.

Gettier presented scenarios where someone has a belief that is both true and justified, yet we still hesitate to call it knowledge. Why? Because the belief turns out to be true by accident.

One of the most well-known examples (though not from Gettier himself but often used to illustrate his point) is the case of the stopped clock. A man glances at a clock that has stopped working, sees that it says 2:00, and forms the belief that it is 2:00. And it just so happens to be 2:00. His belief is true. He used a normally reliable method, checking the time on a clock. And yet, the method failed. The belief was correct purely by coincidence.

Can We Save “Knowledge”

Now, some have tried to save the classical definition by saying, “Well, that wasn’t really justified. The clock was broken, so the belief was faulty from the start.” But that kind of move just shifts the problem. If we start redefining justification every time we hit a weird case, we risk making it so strict that it no longer resembles what anyone would call a “justified belief.”

Others, like Alvin Goldman, proposed ditching the concept of justification entirely. Maybe knowledge isn’t about having reasons, but about using processes that generally lead to truth. This is called reliabilism: if your belief comes from a trustworthy process (like vision, memory, or scientific inference) it counts as knowledge.

But again, the clock case poses a problem. Even if the process is usually reliable, it clearly failed here. So are we back to calling this knowledge, even though it was true by luck?

Still others have suggested that knowledge is less about having the right reasons or processes, and more about the person doing the knowing. This is what’s known as virtue epistemology: the idea that knowledge is a kind of intellectual success rooted in intellectual virtue: careful thinking, honesty, openness to evidence. On this view, knowing isn’t about checking boxes; it’s about doing something well. Like an archer hitting the bullseyes, not by accident, but through skill.

That’s compelling. But even here, questions linger. How do we measure intellectual virtue? And isn’t it still possible to do everything right and end up wrong—or to be wrong for the right reasons and still, somehow, stumble into truth?

An (Initially) Unsettling Realization

Which brings me to a more unsettling thought.

If a belief like “it’s 2:00” can be true, feel justified, come from a reliable process, and still be the product of a broken clock—what else might we be getting wrong without realizing it? Maybe the deeper problem is that we can always be deceived. Even our best faculties (sight, memory, reason etc.) can betray us. And if that’s the case, maybe knowledge (at least in the strong, philosophical sense) is impossible. Or if not impossible, impossible to know if and when you have it.

David Hume once said, “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” That strikes me as a sane and honest approach. The question isn’t whether I can be absolutely certain about what I believe, but whether I have good reasons for believing it—and whether I’m open to changing my mind if those reasons fall apart.

Some might find it unsettling—even scandalous—that we can’t achieve a God’s-eye view of the world. But honestly, what’s strange isn’t that we can’t see things with perfect clarity. It’s that we ever thought we should.

Maybe that’s why I find myself leaning toward fallibilism—the view that we can still know things, even while admitting we might be wrong. That kind of knowledge isn’t rigid or absolute, but humble and revisable. And that, to me, feels much closer to the way real life works.

So no, I’m not sure we need to cling too tightly to the word knowledge, at least not in the abstract, capital-K sense. What matters more is the posture we take toward the truth. That we pursue it carefully, honestly, and with a readiness to revise our beliefs when the evidence calls for it.

At least, that’s what I think I know.

 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals