Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #8: Using Jim Henson’s “The Dark Crystal” to Illustrate Authentic Chastity 

Alright everyone. For this weekend, I would like to share a piece of commentary that has been on my mind for a long time now, one which could be considered a crossover between my “Pop-Cultured Catholic” series and my “Proposing New Ways to Help Understand Chastity” series. And it involves Jim Henson’s puppeteer fantasy film “The Dark Crystal”, along with its prequel series “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance”. How might one build an analogy for proper chastity, using the Skeksis and urRu Mystics from that franchise?

The backstory of “The Dark Crystal” involves these aliens called the urSkeks, who visited the fantasy world of Thra and magically split themselves into two kinds of beings, the urRu Mystics and the Skeksis. The urSkeks did this, using the planet’s titular Crystal of Truth, in an attempt to make themselves better by “purging” what they perceived to be their inner darkness. But that did not go according to plan.

Rather than cleansing themselves, all it did was split the urSkeks into the stoic, wise, spiritual, and peaceful urRu, along with the innovative, ambitious, sybaritic, and passionate Skeksis. The former became too sluggish, weak-willed, detached from the world, and long-term-focused to do much with their wisdom and prophecy. Meanwhile, the latter became corruptible and villainous due to their short-sightedness, impulsiveness, selfish hedonism, and inability to understand what would ultimately satisfy them. However, the Skeksis are framed as not necessarily evil by nature, and the plot’s resolution revolves around the main character successfully recombining them with their urRu counterparts back into urSkeks. It also somewhat reminds me of the moral in that Star Trek episode, “The Enemy Within”.

In the prequel series, “The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance”, there is even a pair of characters who expand upon this theme, urGoh the Wanderer and skekGra the Heretic. They are a Mystic and Skeksis, who both received a prophetic vision that the key to their salvation was reuniting back into urSkeks, then sought each other out. While still unable to recombine, they choose to work cooperatively for their common goal, live together in amicable harmony, and become helpful allies for the main characters. One of my favorite scenes in the show involves urGoh and skekGra explaining their races' backstory, through a puppet show within a puppet show. 

While pondering these applicability of these different characters' symbolisms, I thought about it could be applied to the virtue of chastity, which the Catechism of the Catholic defines as "the successful integration of sexuality within the person and thus the inner unity of man in his bodily and spiritual being". Paragraph #2337 continues: "Sexuality, in which man's belonging to the bodily and biological world is expressed, becomes personal and truly human when it is integrated into the relationship of one person to another, in the complete and lifelong mutual gift of a man and a woman. The virtue of chastity therefore involves the integrity of the person and the integrality of the gift."

With that in mind, here is how I believe each of the characters can be compared to how Christopher West has described different attitudes people may harbor towards Eros, especially the "addict", "stoic", or "aspiring mystic"...

1.) Most of the Skeksis = An Indulgent or Misguided Person Given Into Lustful Hedonism: Initially, the vulture-like Skeksis are respectable, albeit hedonistic characters who were treated as Thra's high-ranking aristocratic class. However, their continued misuse of the Crystal of Truth has caused them to suffer some afflictions and realize that they cannot exist as they are indefinitely. Unfortunately, they discover that they can use the crystal to drain the life "essence" out of Thra's native races, drinking which can give them a fleeting euphoric boost of energy and vitality. Very soon, the short-sighted Skeksis believe that harvesting the life force of Thra's people is the key to immortality and ultimate fulfillment, rather than merging themselves back into urSkeks. And so begins their quest to gradually harvest everyone around them to feed their own endless addiction to life essence. Likewise, one of the major harms of Lust involves the self-seeking treatment of other people as objects to sexually "consume". Plus, when people believe fulfillment lies in maximizing the superficial pleasure associated with sexuality, even at the expense of other people, rather than forging faithful, lifelong, loving, and potentially fruitful bonds with a spouse (or getting into Heaven as a chaste celibate), the Skeksis could arguably symbolize the folly of such mindsets.

2.) Most of the urRu Mystics = A Person Who Merely Represses or Jettisons One's Passions Altogether Due to a Misguided Understanding of Chastity: If I recall correctly, the way Christopher West elsewhere described a Puritanical “Sad Eros” reminded me of the urRu’s weakness, being relatively lifeless, dispassionate, and detached from the immediate goods/issues of the world. As stated earlier, the Mystics are rarely involved in the plot, aside from a select few instances. While they can provide important pieces of wisdom occasionally, their qualities make it hard for them to ever directly and properly engage in the conflict with their Skeksis counterparts, which is framed as a weakness on their part. A common piece of colloquial Christian wisdom is that a person doing God's will should first not be "of the world", as in being primarily influenced by the mentalities of a flawed world. But secondly, most Christians are still called to be engaged "in the world", for the created world is still good, our passions were created good by extension, and one must love and be in-tune with the world's activities to do God's will in it. While prayer and temperance is important, so too is taking action in service of God's will. Also, since one's sensual passions are one of those very things created to be good, a willingness to simply repress it or throw it away like the baby in the bathwater, rather than embrace it as a part of oneself, is a major handicap.

3.) The urGoh and skekGra Duo = Someone Striving to Achieve Authentic Chastity, By Seamlessly Integrating Their Physical Passions and Spiritual Aspirations: Seeing the interaction between urGoh the Wanderer and skekGra the Heretic reminds me of the greatest state of chastity a person could achieve, while still living on Earth under the Fall's effects. Sometimes, urGoh is sluggish and needs egging on from skekGra, while skekGra sometimes exhibits impatient outbursts as a product of his residual Skeksis' weaknesses. However, they realize that they both ultimately want the same goal and try to cooperate as best they can, in order to help the protagonists on their quest. Likewise, even the holiest of saints were still sinners and had to deal with their own spiritual shortcomings and passion-related disorders. Yet one can still strive to do God's will utilizing both sets of desires. And as I alluded to before, if one's understanding of the sexual appetite is to define it as something like "the yearning to initiate and continuously nourish a lifelong and potentially fruitful bond with a mate/spouse, through acts of sexual intercourse", then one might realize that his spiritual goal to follow God's plan for marriage/sexuality and his bodily passions are both ultimately fulfilled by the same things. Sometimes, resisting sexual sins like fornication, pornography, etc. is not about trying to defeat one's bodily desires/passions, but rather properly understanding one's desires enough so that both can be in agreement and cooperate. Finally, just as a prophetic vision brought urGoh and skekGra together, Christopher West uses the image of someone offering their erotic desires up as a prayer, in order for it to be properly ordered.

4.) The Recombined urSkeks = The State of Humanity, After It is All Resurrected in Glorified Bodies: Finally, once humanity is fully redeemed and everything is put back into alignment in a resurrected glorified body, that inner alignment could be represented by the recombined urSkeks at the end of the original Dark Crystal film. Coincidentally, in the religious video I am linking, Christopher West likens chastity to properly orienting one's "rocket engines", so that their "fuel" may allow them to reach the stars rather than crashing. And flying off into the stars is the last thing we see the urSkeks doing, after they are recombined. One other thing I would like to share is a piece of fan art, reimagining a more straightforward way the urSkeks could have looked, which blends the appearances of the urRu and Skeksis into one being. I imagine that piece of fan art I attach would much better represent a resurrected humanity, after God restores a new Heaven and new Earth.

Besides the attached pictures, I will be linking some clips from the prequel series, the original movie, and a video by Christopher West...

1.) "First Essence Drain | The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FnezLs_1ng

2.) "Heretic and UrGoh (Circle of the Suns) | The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkOuUg5Qw2E

3.) "The Puppet Show Within A Puppet Show Scene | The Dark Crystal: Age Of Resistance"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbOmuBj7COU

4.) "The Dark Crystal: The Prophecy Is Fulfilled"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DobSmOHMBe8

5.) "How to Turn Your 'Sexual Needs' into a Prayer | Three Choices with Eros | THEOLOGY OF THE BODY"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMyK0A2hDUs

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Our response to the death of Pope Francis
00:01:29
On the Lookout for Sins of Speech - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Hello! I'm writing a book at present on sins of speech for Emmaus Road. I've been thinking a lot about cultivating healthy habits of communication, so just thought I'd share a few thoughts. Prayers for you during this Holy Week!

00:20:01
The Practice of the Presence of God - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

There are various different prayer practices that people have used in the tradition as a way of remaining in the presence of God--the practice of the presence of God (or recollection) is just one. In this video, I explain a little how it helps us to connect the dots between earthly life and heavenly realities.

00:19:43
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent
Meme Monday

… okay. This isn’t a meme. Just my heart’s deepest longing. Also I’m aware that it’s Wednesday.

post photo preview
Daniel O’Connor

Apparently, Daniel has recorded a video about me canceling him from my show. I haven’t watched it, nor will I, But I was shown a screenshot of an edited message from me to him which I think makes my communication with him seem harsher than it was. Here is his version, mine is beneath. I wish Daniel well.

April 24, 2025

I have resigned from my job. I would appreciate some prayers as I start a new phase in my life. I'll be looking for my next programming gig shortly. Thanks.

post photo preview
Candor and Charity: Reflecting on a Papacy

In a recent article by Archbishop Charles Chaput in First Things, he reflects on the legacy of Pope Francis in this moment between pontificates. He was both charitable and candid—two things we desperately need right now.

I have personal memories of Pope Francis that I greatly value: a friendly and generous working relationship at the 1997 Synod on America when we were both newly appointed archbishops; his personal welcome and warmth at Rome’s 2014 Humanum conference; and the extraordinary success of his 2015 visit to Philadelphia for the Eighth World Meeting of Families. He devoted himself to serving the Church and her people in ways that he felt the times demanded. As a brother in the faith, and a successor of Peter, he deserves our ongoing prayers for his eternal life in the presence of the God he loved.

There’s a real tenderness and respect here. And it’s a good example of how disagreement with a pontificate shouldn’t involve hostility toward the pope. Sadly—though not surprisingly—I’ve seen more than a little of that in comment sections online.

He continues:

Having said that, an interregnum between papacies is a time for candor. The lack of it, given today’s challenges, is too expensive. In many ways, whatever its strengths, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church. He had no direct involvement in the Second Vatican Council and seemed to resent the legacy of his immediate predecessors who did; men who worked and suffered to incarnate the council’s teachings faithfully into Catholic life. His personality tended toward the temperamental and autocratic. He resisted even loyal criticism. He had a pattern of ambiguity and loose words that sowed confusion and conflict.

In the face of deep cultural fractures on matters of sexual behavior and identity, he condemned gender ideology but seemed to downplay a compelling Christian “theology of the body.” He was impatient with canon law and proper procedure. His signature project, synodality, was heavy on process and deficient in clarity. Despite an inspiring outreach to society’s margins, his papacy lacked a confident, dynamic evangelical zeal. The intellectual excellence to sustain a salvific (and not merely ethical) Christian witness in a skeptical modern world was likewise absent.

What the Church needs going forward is a leader who can marry personal simplicity with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ, a leader who has a heart of courage and a keen intellect to match it. Anything less won’t work.

I love that. “A leader with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ.” Amen!

May the Holy Spirit lead the cardinals in choosing our next pope. And may Pope Francis rest in the peace

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Pope is Dead

I got a text from my sister this morning: “The pope died.” I stood there for a moment just staring at the words. I then went to the internet, thinking maybe it was a rumor or a mistake.

But it wasn’t.

Pope Francis died this morning at the age of 88. He passed away in the Casa Santa Marta, the residence inside the Vatican where he had lived since his election in 2013. He had been suffering from a number of health issues in recent years, including a recent case of pneumonia.

His death marks the end of a 12-year papacy, and now the Church enters the period known as sede vacante—the seat of Peter is vacant. Cardinals from around the world will soon gather in Rome for a conclave to elect the next pope. No one knows who it will be, but we should be praying: that the Holy Spirit guide their decision, and that the next pope be a faithful shepherd for the Church in these difficult times.

Pray this prayer with me for the soul of Pope Francis:

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon him. May his souls and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

Read full Article
post photo preview
7 Terrible Arguments For Atheism

I’ve heard plenty of arguments for atheism over the years—some thoughtful, some clever, and some… well, let’s just say I used to rattle off the worst of them back when I was an angsty 17-year-old agnostic.

Today I want to look at 7 terrible arguments for atheism—the kind that sound good at first but fall apart when you give them more than five seconds of thought.

1. "Who created God?"

This question misunderstands what Christians (and classical theists) mean by “God.” God, by definition, is uncaused—the necessary, self-existent being who causes everything else. Asking “Who created God?” is like asking “What’s north of the North Pole?” or “If your brother is a bachelor, what’s his wife’s name?” It’s a category mistake. The question only makes sense if God were a contingent being—just one more thing in the universe that needed a cause. But He isn’t. He’s the reason anything exists at all.

2. "I just believe in one less god than you."

This is clever-sounding but logically shallow. The difference between atheism and theism isn’t about the number of gods one believes in—it’s about the kind of being we’re talking about. Christians reject all finite, tribal, man-made gods too. The Christian claim is not that God is just one more being among many, but that God is Being Itself—the necessary, uncaused source of all reality. Saying, “I just believe in one less god than you,” is like saying, “I contend we’re both bachelors—I just have one less wife.” The difference between one and none isn’t minor—it’s everything. Atheism isn’t a slight variation on theism; it’s a rejection of the entire foundation of existence.

3. "Science has disproven God."

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals