Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #10: How Capcom’s Animated Film, “Resident Evil Damnation”, Portrays A Just Cause Defiled By Unjust Warfare

Hello everyone. This series has not yet delved much into the video games I grew up playing. But I am a big fan of the “Resident Evil”/“Biohazard” games by Capcom.

The RE franchise is a series of science-fiction stories, in which mad scientists play God with biotechnology and mutagenic pathogens, creating various monsters and superhumans. The goals of such research have been to cheat death, advance eugenics, and utilize the monsters as bioweapons. The protagonists also have to confront various criminals responsible for aiding these mad scientists and/or seeking to benefit from their creations, such as bribed government officials, black market traffickers, mercenaries, crime lords, cult leaders, terrorists, and world dictators. The plots are also wrapped up in homages to many of the classic horror films and b-monster flicks. I have enjoyed many of the franchise’s stories, characters, and lore, which exhibit varying ratios of grounded horror vs. blockbuster action and serious drama vs. campy escapism.

While the Resident Evil franchise has not exactly been graced when comes to live-action movie adaptations, there is one animated film I really enjoyed, “Resident Evil Damnation”. It is the second movie in Capcom’s lineup of animated spinoff films, which are connected to the video games’ canon timeline. The plot of RE Damnation involves U.S. agent and recurring game protagonist, Leon Scott Kennedy, who is dropped into the fictional Eastern Slav Republic, where monsters from the games are being used as bioweapons in a civil war. And like with Godzilla, I perceived plot points which could be dissected through the Catechism’s doctrines of Just War, etc.

To make the plot easier to explain, I will give a rundown of the four monsters appearing in this film (and attach pictures of them alongside the three major characters):

1.) Tyrants — In an attempt to create mass producible super-soldiers, human fetuses were grown in-vitro and infected with a mutagenic virus, which gave them superhuman size, strength, speed, healing, and growth rates. The resulting Tyrants were then conditioned and trained to serve as emotionless killing machines, who mutely and ruthlessly carry out any orders they are given.

2.) Lickers — These more ghoulish and animalistic beings originated from humans, who were infected with the same virus used to create the Tyrants but failed to mutate properly. The mutations instead left them with quadrupedal frames, flayed appearances, massive talons, a lack of eyes, an ability to hunt by sound, and long prehensile tongues.

3.) Las Plagas Parasites — A fictional species of mind-controlling parasites from Spain, which can turn the hosts they infect into puppets, whether they be humans, animals, or even other monsters like Lickers. The parasites and their possessed hosts operate collectively like worker bees, through a seemingly telepathic hive-mind.

4.) Master Plagas — The “queen bees” of the Plaga hive-mind, which initially cooperate with their human hosts, allowing the person to retain his free will and even mentally command the horde of parasitized hosts himself. But if the Master Plaga is allowed to grow and mature unchecked, it will become intelligent enough to command the horde on its own, then slowly turn its own human host into another puppet and mouthpiece for itself.

Leon is initially sent in to help the Eastern Slav Republic’s female president, Svetlana Belikova, stop a faction of rebels employing bioweapons against their government, but he soon learns that the conflict is not so black-and-white. After a brief skirmish, Leon is captured by the rebels and gradually learns more of their perspective. In particular, he gets to know the rebels’ soon-to-be leader nicknamed “Buddy”. It turns out Svetlana is running the country like a tyrannical dictator and has heinous war crimes on her hands. One such crime happens to be bombing an elementary school, where Buddy used to teach, alongside his fiancé killed in the attack. Since then, the once pacifistic Buddy has become a fanatical revolutionary bent on overthrowing Svetlana through any means necessary. With the rebels losing the war and seeing their plight ignored by the world, they turned to purchasing illegal bioweapons like Las Plagas parasites and Plaga-controlled Lickers, as their final desperate strategy.

One of my favorite scenes in the film actually involves Leon and Buddy confronting each other inside a Catholic church, as monsters are running amok outside and Svetlana’s bombers are swooping in to level the entire area. In one shot, Leon and Buddy stand arguing on opposite sides of the altar, with the monstrance standing in the background between them. The revolutionaries have temporarily lost control of their monsters, which are now indiscriminately killing or infecting government soldiers, rebel combatants, and civilians alike. Even Buddy is horrified to see one of his own friends get infected and possessed by a rogue Las Plagas parasite, requiring him to be gunned down.

During said scene, a clash of ideals between Leon and Buddy occurs. Leon tries to reason with Buddy and expresses sympathy for his cause, but declares that his faction’s use of bioweapons has defiled their cause and made them the greater evil in his eyes. Leon has witnessed his own town of Raccoon City ravaged by a zombie outbreak, the gruesome collateral damage of these monsters is on display all around them, and other RE stories emphasize how even creating these monsters in the first place is a crime against humanity. For Buddy, however, the stakes of overthrowing Svetlana have become too great and hopeless. He will even use bioweapons as his means to that end, believing that her atrocities justify it and he has nothing left to lose now: "As far as I am concerned, there is no difference between this and using B.O.W.s (Bio-Organic Weapons). If you want to keep this from happening again, put down your gun... Well then. That is my answer, and your answer". As the church is bombed and begins to collapse, Leon and Buddy flee their separate ways. Buddy resolves to infect himself with a new Master Plaga, so he can regain control over the horde of monsters and lead one final charge on the capital, while Leon resolves to stop him.

The following day, when Leon infiltrates Svetlana’s palace amidst the battle, a major plot twist occurs which turns the story into a three-way conflict. Leon discovers that Svetlana herself was the original person stockpiling the bioweapons and has even manipulated things behind the scenes, so the rebels would acquire them. She hoped that the desperate rebels would use them, giving her the perfect propaganda piece for the United Nations. She would be seen by the world as the heroic figure, while the other countries would be spurred into crushing the rest of her enemies for her. And the rebels have taken her bait… hook, line, and sinker.

As a final trump card, Svetlana unleashes her own trio of hulking Tyrant super-soldiers with orders to kill both Leon and Buddy, forcing the pair to reluctantly fight together against the greater threat. Seeing Buddy as one of the only witnesses left, Leon begrudgingly helps him to fight the Tyrants. What follows are multiple action-packed set-pieces, where the two of them escape the facility underneath Svetlana’s palace and continue to fight the Tyrants outside in the streets. The three Tyrants tear through the rebel forces, requiring Leon and Buddy to use hails of bullets, fuel container explosions, a rocket launcher, packs of Plaga-controlled Lickers, and even a tank… only to succeed in bringing down one of the Tyrants.

In the end, the only saving grace is that Leon’s connections keeping track of him managed to get the alert out, that Svetlana was the one originally stockpiling the bioweapons. Right as the two remaining Tyrants are about to kill the exhausted Leon and Buddy, they are annihilated by incoming aircraft. Thanks to the efforts of Leon’s various connections, the other countries are instead intervening to bring Svetlana’s forces to heel rather than her enemies. The epilogue begins with Leon and Buddy overlooking the aftermath.

During the final scene between Leon and Buddy, we see the latter reaching the brink of despair and only be saved, when Leon intervenes with a rather life-affirming speech. Buddy sorrowfully concedes that their use of bioweapons was in vain, only playing into Svetlana's hands and resulting in the deaths of all his friends and many more civilians. With his Master Plaga parasite still growing inside him, Buddy is about to kill himself. He believes that would be a better fate than either losing his humanity to the parasite or removing the parasite from his spine to become permanently crippled with "nothing left" to live for. However, Leon snatches away the gun: “I'd feel the same way if I was you. But the option of taking our own lives no longer belongs to us. Once we start using these (the gun), we owe it to the people who died alongside us. We have to continue living. Even if it means living the rest of our lives without the use of our limbs. That is my answer and your answer, Buddy”. With that, Leon aims for Buddy’s spine and shoots the parasite inside him.

In a mid-credits scene, we see Buddy living on in a wheelchair, but surrounded by schoolchildren whose prosperity he can find new purpose in. Rather than affirming Buddy’s impulse to take his own life, Leon saved him and ultimately gave Buddy the chance to find more reasons to live. That is, despite Buddy going through all that loss and now being paraplegic for the rest of his days. Particularly from a Catholic perspective, this ending for Buddy could reflect a rather uplifting and resonant closure.

Overall, a lot of same morals promoted by Catholicism can be interpreted in the story of “Resident Evil Damnation”, including what violates the doctrine of Just War, the harms of trying to achieve a good end with evil means, the life-affirming attitudes expressed by Leon near the end, and the laundry list of bioethics violations portrayed as in any typical “Resident Evil”/“Biohazard” plot. Similar to what I brought up in my Godzilla post, some of Catholicism's tenets on Just War are that the declaration of war cannot produce worse evils than the ones to be eliminated, every individual act of war must still be morally licit, and that "Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man... A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons - especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons - to commit such crimes". The story proposes another reason why one should not use evil means to achieve a good end, for it may initially seem like the only way to defeat one's enemies, but then end up playing right into the enemies' hands. The resolution to Buddy's story is theologically satisfying. And since the Catholic Church does exist in the Resident Evil universe, I imagine the Pope's fictional counterpart(s) would have a field day calling out all the misuses of science: the creation of deadly mutagenic pathogens, eugenics research, criminal experimentation, the trafficking of humans to be used as test subjects, the manufacturing of unborn humans in labs for such research, and the turning of human beings into weaponized monsters.

In conclusion, here are some clips from the movie I broke down:

1.) RE Damnation's Japanese Movie Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVTdoGPFS34

2.) Leon's Skirmish With the First Licker and Capture By Rebels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgb0bDq123o

3.) Scene of Las Plagas Parasite Infecting Soldier
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOKhp64IGz0

4.) The Infection and Death of Buddy's Friend, J.D.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzUC4HJNmLw

5.) Leon vs. Svetlana vs. Buddy Underneath the Palace Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDbpJN3e9Mo

6.) Leon vs. Svetlana vs. Buddy Underneath the Palace Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIfEGVWmVe8

7.) Svetlana Unleashes the Tyrants Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLLU72E4FpM

8.) Svetlana Unleashes the Tyrants Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPwG8ZE27CY

9.) Leon and Buddy Fight Third Tyrant in Streets Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckvIk866Db8

10.) Leon and Buddy Fight Third Tyrant in Streets Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egB0yiLhP2U

11.) Abridged Clip of Military Saving Leon from Other Two Tyrants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXsyOtrquAA

12.) Leon's Final Exchange With Buddy and Buddy's Mid-Credits Epilogue Scene:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unLNMFjI9Ss

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Our response to the death of Pope Francis
00:01:29
On the Lookout for Sins of Speech - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Hello! I'm writing a book at present on sins of speech for Emmaus Road. I've been thinking a lot about cultivating healthy habits of communication, so just thought I'd share a few thoughts. Prayers for you during this Holy Week!

00:20:01
The Practice of the Presence of God - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

There are various different prayer practices that people have used in the tradition as a way of remaining in the presence of God--the practice of the presence of God (or recollection) is just one. In this video, I explain a little how it helps us to connect the dots between earthly life and heavenly realities.

00:19:43
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent
Meme Monday

… okay. This isn’t a meme. Just my heart’s deepest longing. Also I’m aware that it’s Wednesday.

post photo preview
Daniel O’Connor

Apparently, Daniel has recorded a video about me canceling him from my show. I haven’t watched it, nor will I, But I was shown a screenshot of an edited message from me to him which I think makes my communication with him seem harsher than it was. Here is his version, mine is beneath. I wish Daniel well.

April 24, 2025

I have resigned from my job. I would appreciate some prayers as I start a new phase in my life. I'll be looking for my next programming gig shortly. Thanks.

post photo preview
Candor and Charity: Reflecting on a Papacy

In a recent article by Archbishop Charles Chaput in First Things, he reflects on the legacy of Pope Francis in this moment between pontificates. He was both charitable and candid—two things we desperately need right now.

I have personal memories of Pope Francis that I greatly value: a friendly and generous working relationship at the 1997 Synod on America when we were both newly appointed archbishops; his personal welcome and warmth at Rome’s 2014 Humanum conference; and the extraordinary success of his 2015 visit to Philadelphia for the Eighth World Meeting of Families. He devoted himself to serving the Church and her people in ways that he felt the times demanded. As a brother in the faith, and a successor of Peter, he deserves our ongoing prayers for his eternal life in the presence of the God he loved.

There’s a real tenderness and respect here. And it’s a good example of how disagreement with a pontificate shouldn’t involve hostility toward the pope. Sadly—though not surprisingly—I’ve seen more than a little of that in comment sections online.

He continues:

Having said that, an interregnum between papacies is a time for candor. The lack of it, given today’s challenges, is too expensive. In many ways, whatever its strengths, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church. He had no direct involvement in the Second Vatican Council and seemed to resent the legacy of his immediate predecessors who did; men who worked and suffered to incarnate the council’s teachings faithfully into Catholic life. His personality tended toward the temperamental and autocratic. He resisted even loyal criticism. He had a pattern of ambiguity and loose words that sowed confusion and conflict.

In the face of deep cultural fractures on matters of sexual behavior and identity, he condemned gender ideology but seemed to downplay a compelling Christian “theology of the body.” He was impatient with canon law and proper procedure. His signature project, synodality, was heavy on process and deficient in clarity. Despite an inspiring outreach to society’s margins, his papacy lacked a confident, dynamic evangelical zeal. The intellectual excellence to sustain a salvific (and not merely ethical) Christian witness in a skeptical modern world was likewise absent.

What the Church needs going forward is a leader who can marry personal simplicity with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ, a leader who has a heart of courage and a keen intellect to match it. Anything less won’t work.

I love that. “A leader with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ.” Amen!

May the Holy Spirit lead the cardinals in choosing our next pope. And may Pope Francis rest in the peace

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Pope is Dead

I got a text from my sister this morning: “The pope died.” I stood there for a moment just staring at the words. I then went to the internet, thinking maybe it was a rumor or a mistake.

But it wasn’t.

Pope Francis died this morning at the age of 88. He passed away in the Casa Santa Marta, the residence inside the Vatican where he had lived since his election in 2013. He had been suffering from a number of health issues in recent years, including a recent case of pneumonia.

His death marks the end of a 12-year papacy, and now the Church enters the period known as sede vacante—the seat of Peter is vacant. Cardinals from around the world will soon gather in Rome for a conclave to elect the next pope. No one knows who it will be, but we should be praying: that the Holy Spirit guide their decision, and that the next pope be a faithful shepherd for the Church in these difficult times.

Pray this prayer with me for the soul of Pope Francis:

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon him. May his souls and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

Read full Article
post photo preview
7 Terrible Arguments For Atheism

I’ve heard plenty of arguments for atheism over the years—some thoughtful, some clever, and some… well, let’s just say I used to rattle off the worst of them back when I was an angsty 17-year-old agnostic.

Today I want to look at 7 terrible arguments for atheism—the kind that sound good at first but fall apart when you give them more than five seconds of thought.

1. "Who created God?"

This question misunderstands what Christians (and classical theists) mean by “God.” God, by definition, is uncaused—the necessary, self-existent being who causes everything else. Asking “Who created God?” is like asking “What’s north of the North Pole?” or “If your brother is a bachelor, what’s his wife’s name?” It’s a category mistake. The question only makes sense if God were a contingent being—just one more thing in the universe that needed a cause. But He isn’t. He’s the reason anything exists at all.

2. "I just believe in one less god than you."

This is clever-sounding but logically shallow. The difference between atheism and theism isn’t about the number of gods one believes in—it’s about the kind of being we’re talking about. Christians reject all finite, tribal, man-made gods too. The Christian claim is not that God is just one more being among many, but that God is Being Itself—the necessary, uncaused source of all reality. Saying, “I just believe in one less god than you,” is like saying, “I contend we’re both bachelors—I just have one less wife.” The difference between one and none isn’t minor—it’s everything. Atheism isn’t a slight variation on theism; it’s a rejection of the entire foundation of existence.

3. "Science has disproven God."

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals