Morning, all.
Today I’ll attempt a socratic dialogue on Mary as Theotokos, or "Mother of God."
James is the Protestant, Thomas is the Catholic.
James: Thomas, I gotta say, I don’t get how you can call Mary the “Mother of God.”
Thomas: Alright?
James: I mean, how can a finite human being possibly be the mother of the infinite God? It doesn’t make sense—unless you’re elevating Mary to some sort of divine status.
Thomas: Well, let me ask you: do you agree that Mary is the mother of Jesus?
James: Obviously, yes.
Thomas: And do you agree that Jesus is God?
James: Of course. He’s fully God and fully man.
Thomas: Then logically, Mary is the Mother of God. She isn’t the mother of His divine nature—that’s eternal and uncreated, which I think is where you’re getting stuck. But she is the mother of Jesus, the one person who is both fully God and fully man. The logic is simple and unavoidable:
Mary is the mother of Jesus.
Jesus is God.
Therefore, Mary is the Mother of God.
James: I don’t know… it feels like another invention by the Church to give Mary too much attention. And it’s nowhere in Scripture.
Thomas: True, the title “Mother of God” isn’t explicitly in Scripture, but neither are terms like “Trinity,” “Hypostatic Union,” or even “Bible.” The title is a theological conclusion drawn from Scripture, not something made up later. Take Luke 1:43, for instance. Elizabeth calls Mary “the mother of my Lord.” In the context of Luke’s Gospel, “Lord” is clearly a title for God.