It’s Last Call! Jay Stringer is here to debunk six myths about pornography you may have bought into.

Pints: Last Call Ep. 38

Jay Stringer joins the show, emphasizing that lasting freedom from porn comes from grieving the origin stories behind our desires, not from white-knuckling and will power.

Ep. 602

📚 Resources Mentioned:

More from Jay Stringer: https://jay-stringer.com

Desire by Jay Stringer: https://jay-stringer.com/books

Desire by Jay Stringer (AUDIO BOOK): https://open.spotify.com/show/7dxLRVVGueabQwRuCYGSWB?si=bb618491a17f45e8

Unwanted by Jay Stringer: https://jay-stringer.com/books

Unwanted by Jay Stringer (AUDIO BOOK): https://open.spotify.com/show/3FghpbxBABfAhUDNktGuDg?si=7361ff07f2674ffc

The Journey Course by Jay Stringer: https://www.thejourneycourse.com

Good Pictures Bad Pictures: https://a.co/d/06Z8EeWW

Theotokos Rosaries: https://dwplus.shop/TheotokosRosaries

Truthly 30 Day Free Trial: https://get.truthly.ai/TlbX/MATT30

Does Pope Leo XIV's recent reaffirmation that the death penalty is "inadmissible" contradict or continue the Church’s earlier teaching?

Matt Fradd All Access Ep. 25

This is a sneak peak! I post video essays like this every Friday, exclusively to DailyWire for All Access members. Hope to see you there! https://get.dailywire.com

Theotokos Rosaries: https://dwplus.shop/TheotokosRosaries

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

When my husband and I went in for our pre-convalidation meeting with my priest at the time, he said we could proceed with the convalidation if my husband agreed to raise the children Catholic. He said he would. If I remember correctly, it was in our vows, and it was part of their baptism.

However, during these years I've been a practicing Catholic it appears his interpretation of that promise/agreement was "I won't interfere with my wife teaching the children Catholicism." And that's it. He's allowed and encouraged all but our youngest to not attend the Catholic Church or proceed with any sacraments. He even encourages them to "join him in hell/Valhalla."

Sometimes I wonder if that means our marriage may not actually be valid.

Please pray for my fiancée’s friend, Mia. Mia has been diagnosed with cancer and has just undergone her first round of chemotherapy. The treatment has left her in a lot of pain and almost completely removed her white blood cell count, causing further complications from infections. Her pain has been so terrible that he has even expressed fleeting thoughts of giving up. 🙏🙏🙏

Although Mia has emigrated from the Philippines to the United States, she recently went on a trip to the Philippines to visit my fiancée again before undergoing her treatment. That is when I first spoke with her via video chat with my fiancée. She is a very kind, lovely, and still young woman. So any prayers for her would be greatly appreciated.

Why a Catholic Man Should Marry a Catholic Woman

1. Marriage Is a Sacrament — And Sacraments Require Full Participation

Catholic marriage isn't just a wedding. It is one of the seven sacraments, a covenant that confers grace and images the love of Christ for His Church (Ephesians 5:25-32). When two baptized Catholics marry, both spouses are not just receivers of the sacrament — they are actually the ministers of the sacrament to each other. That means the graces of the sacrament flow most fully when both spouses share the same sacramental life — the same Eucharist, the same Confession, the same faith.

A non-Catholic Christian cannot share the Eucharist with her Catholic husband at their own wedding Mass. That's not a small thing. It's the source and summit of the Christian life, and it would be absent from the central moment of the marriage.

2. The Church Herself Discourages Mixed Marriages

This is not medieval rigidity — it is pastoral wisdom. Directly from the Vatican's own document Matrimonia Mixta, Pope Paul VI wrote: "The Church, ...