Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
Why Catholics are Right About the Eucharist
September 18, 2022
post photo preview

Below is a short artice I wrote a while back on why Catholics are right about the Eucharist. I hope it's a blessing to you.

Catholics and Protestants have different views about the Eucharist. Catholics, like myself, believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist. That Jesus is literally and wholly present—body and blood, soul and divinity—under the appearances of bread and wine—a view known as transubstantiation. 

In Protestant circles, there is a range of views. While most Protestants don’t believe in transubstantiation, a majority do believe in some form of the real presence. The belief that Christ’s body and blood are really present in the Eucharist is common in Lutheran, Anglican, and Methodist circles. In Calvinist circles, it is common to say that Christ’s body and blood are spiritually received in the Eucharist, and in Baptist circles it is believed that the bread and wine only symbolize Christ’s body and blood. In other words, they hold that when Christ said “this is my body; this is my blood” he was speaking metaphorically.

While the views vary in their details, they fall into two broad classes: The belief that Christ’s body and blood are really present in the Eucharist and that they are not, meaning that they are only spiritually or symbolically present.

When Catholics and Protestants debate which view is correct, each side has its list of scriptural texts at the ready. The Catholic—and many Protestants—might point to John 6:53 where our Lord says, “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.” “What more do you need?” While a Protestant who takes the symbolic view retorts, “Yes, but in verse 63 Jesus explains that his words are meant to be interpreted spiritually, ‘It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.’”

And then we go back and forth about why the scripture our interlocutor is citing doesn't actually prove what he thinks it does. Fine. The Bible is the word of God, and it is obviously a good thing when Christians want to be faithful to it.

But my point is this: both faithful Catholics and Protestants know what the Bible says, but we don’t agree on what it means. One way of solving this problem is to look more closely at the details of the text. However, we need to be sure that we are reading the text the way that the ancient audience did, and that means it’s useful to look to what the earliest Christians believed. If, for example, the earliest Christians believed that when Christ said, “this is my body; this is my blood” he meant it metaphorically, and the Catholic belief in the real, literal presence is completely unheard of until the middle ages, then it would make sense to me to go with the more ancient interpretation? Conversely, if it can be shown that the early Church did believe unanimously in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, and the view that the Eucharist is merely a symbol was basically unheard of until the last few centuries, then, again, I think it makes more sense to go with that ancient belief.

Now, don’t misunderstand me. I’m not equating the writings of the early Christians with the Bible. The Bible is the inspired and inerrant word of God. The writings of the early Christians are not. Individual early Christian writers no doubt believed and even taught errors. But the early Church Fathers were closer in time and culture to the apostles, and they shed important light on the question of how the original audience would have understood the text. Also, what they wrote concerning the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist is what was handed on to them from the apostolic age. And they handed that down to us through a hundred successive generations.

So, what did they hand down to us? 

The first early Christian we’ll look at is St. Ignatius of Antioch, who lived in the first century and likely heard the preaching of the apostles, particularly St. John,  themselves. Ignatius was named bishop of Antioch during a time when being a Christian in the Roman Empire was punishable by death, and he was actually sentenced to public execution by wild beasts. In his letter to the Christians at Smyrnaea, he tells them not to associate with certain gnostic heretics who denied that Christ really became man. In it, he discusses the Eucharist. He writes:

“Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in his goodness, raised up again” (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1 [A.D. 110]). 

Next we’ll look at St. Cyril of Jerusalem, who was named bishop of Jerusalem in A.D. 350 and who participated at the Council of Constantinople in 381. He was a great defender of the faith against the heresy of Arianism, which is the idea that there was a time when God the Son did not exist. Here’s what St Cyril wrote about the Eucharist: 

“The bread and the wine of the Eucharist before the holy invocation of the adorable Trinity were simple bread and wine, but the invocation having been made, the bread becomes the body of Christ and the wine the blood of Christ” (Catechetical Lectures 19:7 [A.D. 350]).

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
8
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Further Thoughts on the TLM - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

With recent announcements in Charlotte and Detroit, it feels like old wounds are getting re-opened. This video provides a couple of principles and arguments that can help think through and pray though liturgical life in 2025.

00:25:05
Boundaries in Conversation - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Hello! Ever unsure of where to spend your time? I was thinking about this recently apropos of responding to emails and engaging in conversations. I'm not sure that I've come up with tight conclusions yet, but I have at least begun to formulate some principles. I hope that it's helpful for you! Cheers!

00:24:04
Nine Years In - Taking Stock of My Priestly Life - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

I was ordained on May 21, 2016 . . . as I celebrated an anniversary this past month, I prayed a bit about what the Lord has done, is doing, and might do in my life. What gives life? What deals death? And then, well, I pushed record. Here's what come out : )

00:19:22
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent
This PWA App is going be the best app in the history of apps

Guys, I am so freaking excited about this PWA app we're working hard on. It is going to be a MASSIVE upgrade to Locals. Extremely easy to navigate. Basically every feature we have here on Locals but 100 times better (no offense, Locals, I love you).

Once the app launches all you'll have to do is use your same username and password to login ... More on that when it launches (not for a few months)

Pumped.

Incidentally your support here on Locals is what makes it possible to pay for this bloody app. Not cheap.

Love you guys!

Just a reminder to please pray for Laura Horn. I believe Trent said she goes into surgery tomorrow (July 23) for the brain tumor.

Lord Jesus, we humbly ask that you may guide the hands of the surgeons to carefully and skillfully perform this surgery so as to save the life of Laura. Amen.

20 hours ago

Hi all,

I would appreciate if you could say a prayer for my relatives and reconciliation between them.

Thanks, God bless.

post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Practical Method For Spiritual Warfare
 
In this article, I want to suggest a powerful, practical method for spiritual warfare—one that I believe will be a game-changer in your everyday life. We'll explore how consistently announcing what is true and renouncing what is false can become a potent weapon, helping you navigate the unseen battles that often manifest as struggles in our thoughts and emotions.
 
At the Catholic Easter Vigil Mass, there is a significant moment where the congregation renews their Baptismal Promises.

In essence, the priest leads the faithful to announce what is true and to renounce what is false.

For the purposes of this article we’ll begin with the questions that invite annunciations. He asks:

"Do you believe in God, the Father almighty, Creator of heaven and earth?"

"Do you believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was born of the Virgin Mary, suffered death and was buried, rose again from the dead and is seated at the right hand of the Father?"

"Do you believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting?"

In responding “I do” to these questions, we are in a very real sense aligning ourselves with reality. While emotions may be present, they don’t need to be. Simply stating our agreement with the way things are is enough.

Prior to the above questions are a series of questions which invite renunciation:

"Do you renounce sin, so as to live in the freedom of the children of God?"

"Do you renounce the lure of evil, so that sin may have no mastery over you?"

"Do you renounce Satan, the author and prince of sin?"

In responding “I do” to these questions, we are renouncing, repudiating, what is false.

To those who may attend Holy Mass once or twice a year they may be surprised to discover just how seriously the Church takes the reality of the Devil and spiritual warfare. But anyone somewhat familiar with the Scriptures and the consistent teaching of the Church would not be. Here I could dump a multitude of Scriptural verses proving my point, but one will suffice. From the first letter of St. Peter:

"Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. Resist him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same kinds of suffering are being experienced by your brotherhood throughout the world."

And now for the main point of this article: Just as it is beneficial to regularly align ourselves with what is true (say through an act of faith), it is also beneficial to regularly repudiate, and disassociate with, what is false.

And given that our lives are situated squarely within a world at war. A world which “lies in the power of the evil one.” in which demonic forces are seeking to blind us to the things of God (2 Cor. 4:4). This is something we are going to be needing to do in one form or another on a daily basis. Multiple times a day.

Let me offer a personal anecdote that will illustrate this. I was about to interview someone on a topic that I knew would get blowback from the Demonic realm. I was going on a walk praying my rosary before my guest arrived. While I was walking I slowly became aware of a sort of oppressive force. I felt sad and restricted, somehow. Anxious. I’m not sure how long I was feeling that way, but at any rate I didn’t become conscious of it until that moment. I stopped walking and tried to sum up what I was experiencing in a word. It clicked. intimidation. That’s was it. I felt intimidated. And so I said the following prayer:

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Life is very, very simple, actually.

There is a lot going on. We are confused about many things. Embarrassed that we are confused. Pretend not to be. Have a few soundbites we can rely on when the conversation turns to Trump or the state of the Church or what is going on in Israel and Gaza or the AI revolution. We hope they don’t press us because we know enough to answer two or three questions before they will hit bedrock and we will have nothing.

All of this can lead us to believe the lie that life is complicated. And since we cannot figure it out, we should either quit, or numb, or pretend, or run ourselves ragged trying to understand everything we think we should understand.

And yet life is simple. Very, very simple. There is very little to figure out.

Love what is good. Hate what is evil. But how? When I have willingly habituated myself to do the opposite. Pray. Repent. Keep turning away from distractions. Don’t hate yourself for failing. Hope in the good God who is better than you think He is. Who cares for you more than you think He does.

What are your duties? Do them with joy and attention. Don’t hate yourself when you fail at this. Pray. Repent. Have a sense of humor about your littleness. You are incredibly loved after all, remember?

Turn away from what is useless and petty and vulgar and think about what is excellent.

Say “Your will be done” 100 times a day, especially when things are bad or seem meaningless. Your headache. Your bad night sleep. The house you can’t seem to get around to tidying.

Be patient and gentle with stupid people who can’t seem to make themselves love or want to love what is good, yourself first and foremost.

Jesus, help me want to want to love you. Help me want to want to hate anything opposed to you or your kingdom.

Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals