Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #28: Aztecs' Sacrifice and Human Greed vs. Our Lady of Guadalupe and… Algonquins' Wendigo Tales?

Where I live, we are now past the middle of winter and had our coldest week yet this season. For such an occasion, I am doing another horror folklore-themed post, similar to the one last October when I contrasted the vampire archetype with Jesus’ Eucharist and Resurrection. But to begin this, I will first recall the history of the Aztec Empire’s collapse…

One of the most infamous atrocities to befall the Americas, without European involvement, is the human sacrifices conducted by the Aztecs in Mexico. Many have heard about how, despite all their societal advancements, the Aztec Empire (known more formally as the "Ēxcān Tlahtōlōyān" or "Triple Alliance" ) had the fatal flaw of worshipping gods who were quite literally bloodthirsty. Such examples included the earth goddess Tlaltecuhtli, the sun god Tonatiuh, and the rain god Tlaloc. Without human sacrifices to sustain them, certain gods in the Aztec pantheon would be unable to continue making the crops grow, supplying sunlight, supplying rain, and so on. In the century leading up to Hernán Cortés' arrival, there was a particularly devastating drought which led to a greater number of mass sacrifices. According to a live science article, "The skeletal remains of at least 42 children, ages 2 to 7, were discovered at Templo Mayor, the most significant temple complex in Tenochtitlán, now Mexico City, in 1980 and 1981", as one example dating back to that period. The Aztecs' rate of sacrifices were reportedly high enough to even earn the loathing of other neighboring civilizations, who themselves occasionally practiced human sacrifice. Wars would be waged with other tribes and kingdoms in order to supplement the sacrifices with captives or tributes. In one final detail that will be thematically important for my post, it is reported that these human sacrifices would sometimes be accompanied by ritual cannibalism too.

In contrast to these Aztec mindsets, Native American tribes of the Algonquin regions far north of Mexico passed down cautionary tales of a folkloric monster, which embodies similar evils… the wendigo. The Algonquin-speaking tribes lived around geographical locations like Canada, the Great Lakes, Saint Lawrence River, and the northern areas of the Eastern Coast. Many of these are notorious for their very harsh winters. Famine and hypothermia would be very real threats for an unprepared tribe… along with the temptation to commit evil acts in the name of survival. But there was another warning communicated through their folk tales. In the Algonquin legends, if a man facing these winters tried to survive by resorting to murder, selfishness, greed, and other sins, he could become possessed and transformed by an evil spirit. A shared element across many versions of these tales is how a human’s transformation is not complete, without him at one point succumbing to cannibalism. From my understanding, the word “wendigo” can refer to the demon itself or the transformed man, who becomes a Gollum-like, emaciated, and frostbit husk that insatiably feeds on other men. There is even an apparent form of psychiatric disorder named “Wendigo Psychosis”, after the monster.

In a way, I think the fall of the Aztec Empire could be interpreted as a failure to embrace the morals, which Algonquins tribes conveyed through their wendigo stories. It appears that the Aztecs’ customs of human sacrifice and the Algonquins’ tales of the wendigos reflect polar opposite mindsets. In the Aztecs’ point of view, even the gods were not above the need for survival and sustenance, which made them justify the murder of people for sacrifice, sometimes even considering such a fate to be pious and honorable. In contrast, the Algonquins who saw brutally harsh weather come and go every year have seemingly embraced an attitude that murdering one’s kin is never justified as a means to an end, not even as a perceived way to ensure survival. For even if one is to die, evil acts like that corrupt a person’s very soul and can lead to a fate worse than death. In not following that mindset, one could almost say that the Aztec civilization became an embodiment of the wendigo on societal scale. So in the eyes of the Aztecs’ neighboring tribes and kingdoms, the empire became a demonic bloodthirsty monster that must be vanquished. They wanted it overthrown so much that they willingly joined forces with the Spanish conquistadors to make that happen.

While the Spaniards and Aztecs’ neighbors superficially shattered the Aztec Empire’s evils by force, some of those perpetuated evils were not fully cleansed and healed, until the Virgin Mary’s appearance to Juan Diego as Our Lady of Guadalupe. The apparitions of Mary in Mexico needs virtually no introduction. The reported miracle of Mary’s image appearing on Juan Diego’s tilma, its intricate symbolism, the long time it has survived, and people’s alleged difficulty finding a natural way someone could have replicated the image are all very famous among Catholics. Juan Diego, the first Native American to be canonized as a saint, was entrusted in part to relay Mary’s message and have a church be built on the hill once occupied by one of the Aztec temples. Mary's message included that she would offer to take the people of Mexico under her wing as their new holy mother and that her son Jesus Christ shall be the one and only human sacrifice. These alleged apparitions in 1531 are credited with the conversion of millions of Mexicans to Catholicism within a relatively short period of time.

In keeping with Mary’s role of bringing people to Jesus, it seems only fitting that an Algonquin monster which parallels the evils she helped cleanse in Mexico can also be interpreted as an antithesis to Christ’s Holy Eucharist… just like the European vampire. In my very first post for the month of October, I contrasted the parallel imagery between the Holy Eucharist and the Resurrection with that of the Western vampire archetype. It is often interpreted that vampires resonate as a symbol of the unholy, due to how they are an inversion of the Christ figure. Jesus rose from the dead with a glorified body, more alive and radiant than before. And he gives life by infinitely offering his ever-living transubstantiated flesh and blood to consume. Meanwhile, the vampire rises from the dead as this undead husk, whose existence shuns the light like a soul living in a state of damnation. And it must infinitely take blood from humans to sustain what little emulation of life it has. While sharing that post, I compared the initial shocked reactions of Christ’s listeners to his Eucharistic command with the common cultural taboos of cannibalism, citing the Arabian ghouls and Native American wendigos as flesh-eating equivalents to the blood-drinking vampires. This clash of imagery seems to come full circle here too, with how the Aztecs’ methods of worshiping their gods through human sacrifice sometimes involved ritual cannibalism, before that evil was stopped and Mexico’s population would now be consuming the Eucharist.

With many evolving variants of the wendigo folklore, there is another recurring detail which is thought to illustrate the deadly sin of Greed… in a way that Christians could also relate to. In many versions of the folk tales, wendigos also have varying kinds and degrees of supernatural power. Sometimes, wendigos would have the ability to grow in size with every meal, while remaining just as gaunt and emaciated as before. A wendigo that has eaten a lot could grow into a giant, yet still experience the pain of perpetual starvation and a compulsion to consume ever increasing amounts, just to feel the same fleeting relief. A popular interpretation is that Algonquin tribes started to emphasize that symbolism of their wendigo stories more, in the wake of some European settlers unethically seizing the land in the name of Manifest Destiny. Incidentally, I remember apologists like Bishop Robert Barron repeatedly describing Greed as an attempt to fill that God-shaped hole in one’s heart with material goods. When one seeks infinite fulfillment from finite created things, such idolatry could lead to vicious cycle where a person keeps futilely trying to satisfy oneself with increasing amounts of goods and pleasures. It could get to the point where one possesses enough for himself to make many people happy and grateful, yet still feel deprived and “starving”.

Over the decades since the 20th century, wendigos have become a more popular monster in mainstream pop-culture, though the depictions have undergone various changes like a game of Telephone. One of the earliest examples I know of is Algernon Blackwood’s 1910 novella, “The Wendigo”, about a pair of Scottish hunters and their guides who go for a trip into the Canadian wilderness during winter. They are stalked by a paranormal presence, which eventually drives one of their guides, Défago, mad and chases him off into the night. By the time they come upon Défago again, he is delirious and dies from exposure, while their frightened Native American cook believes Défago had seen the wendigo. That novella has influenced and/or been praised by later horror writers including H.P. Lovecraft, with Alvin Schwartz even incorporating an abridged version of “The Wendigo” in his “Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark” anthology books (albeit with some alterations). Though, this novella and its derivatives have drifted away from the Wendigo’s original symbolism of cannibalism and greed, depicting the entity more as a malevolent nature spirit in general. Going further, 2001’s independent film by Larry Fessenden, “Wendigo”, portrays the titular demon partially taking the form of a deer which the protagonist accidentally hit with his car. Arguably that cult film is one of the earliest films to popularize the trope of having wendigos sport antlers, wear a deer skull, or even be a half-man/half-deer monster akin to the were-beast archetype. A prime example of later works following that trend is the 2021 film produced by Guillermo del Toro, “Antlers”, loosely based on a short story by Nick Antosca called “The Quiet Boy”. Though, the same Larry Fessenden would go on to help write the 2015 video game, “Until Dawn”, which portrays its wendigos in a manner much more faithful to the original folklore.

To supplement this, here is the specific article I quoted, along with some educational videos on Our Lady of Guadalupe and clips from the pop-culture works portraying wendigos...

1.) Live Science's Archaeology Article
https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/mass-child-sacrifices-in-15th-century-mexico-were-a-desperate-attempt-to-appease-rain-god-and-end-devastating-drought

2.) Father Mike Schmitz's Analysis Titled "What People Forget About Our Lady of Guadalupe":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_UFq1AFoBM

3.) Jon Solo's "The VERY Messed Up Origins™ of the Wendigo: Cannibal Demon | Native American Folklore Explained":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axRkTEy4sGo

4.) Fan-Made Dramatic Reading of "Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark - Chapter 05 - The Wendigo":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EtQvj2fTKs

5.) Clip of the Wendigos in the "Until Dawn" Video Game:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wZL8JSUba4

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Nine Years In - Taking Stock of My Priestly Life - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

I was ordained on May 21, 2016 . . . as I celebrated an anniversary this past month, I prayed a bit about what the Lord has done, is doing, and might do in my life. What gives life? What deals death? And then, well, I pushed record. Here's what come out : )

00:19:22
Sneak Peek: Tammy Peterson

This Wednesday I'll release my interview with Tammy Peterson here on Locals. Thanks for being a member of Locals.

00:00:58
The Human Excellence that Technology Can Never Replace - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Squad, I've been thinking about AI lately. It's not that I understand the technology, though I am trying some, but that my limited understanding has given me occasion to think specifically about what is distinctive to the human person. And, it turns out, those distinctive notes are incredibly precious. In this video, I'm think about our call to conversation for intimacy . . . look forward to chatting with you there.

00:21:22
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

Last day of the month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. This photo is from the beautiful Sacred Heart Church in Conroe, Texas where we serve and attend mass ❤️

My very anti-Catholic family members, including my aunt who so often comes after me about being Catholic, are in Rome right now and just their day visiting The Vatican, the Sistine Chapel, and St. Peter's Basilica.

May the Lord use this vacation to soften their hearts towards Catholicism.

Little nuggets....little nods from God letting me know that He's here, He's listening, He cares, He knows, and He's got this:

My 17 year old daughter is agnostic, if not outright atheist. It isn't so much an "I don't believe in God" as it is an "I don't care whether or not there is a God." However, she comes to me for advice and moral support (where she wants it, but hey, at least she comes to me). But, yesterday took me by surprise. She was on the phone with a friend and came looking for me. Her friend asked me to pray for her father who is in the hospital with sepsis. I took the phone and stepped outside away from my daughter, thinking she'd be uncomfortable with me praying, but she followed me, and while she didn't join me in prayer, she seemed very grateful. She may not have faith in God, but she has faith in my faith in God, and that's something.

I've been praying deliverance prayers over my house, family, and property. I'm no stranger to demonic attacks. Most of the time...

post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Life is very, very simple, actually.

There is a lot going on. We are confused about many things. Embarrassed that we are confused. Pretend not to be. Have a few soundbites we can rely on when the conversation turns to Trump or the state of the Church or what is going on in Israel and Gaza or the AI revolution. We hope they don’t press us because we know enough to answer two or three questions before they will hit bedrock and we will have nothing.

All of this can lead us to believe the lie that life is complicated. And since we cannot figure it out, we should either quit, or numb, or pretend, or run ourselves ragged trying to understand everything we think we should understand.

And yet life is simple. Very, very simple. There is very little to figure out.

Love what is good. Hate what is evil. But how? When I have willingly habituated myself to do the opposite. Pray. Repent. Keep turning away from distractions. Don’t hate yourself for failing. Hope in the good God who is better than you think He is. Who cares for you more than you think He does.

What are your duties? Do them with joy and attention. Don’t hate yourself when you fail at this. Pray. Repent. Have a sense of humor about your littleness. You are incredibly loved after all, remember?

Turn away from what is useless and petty and vulgar and think about what is excellent.

Say “Your will be done” 100 times a day, especially when things are bad or seem meaningless. Your headache. Your bad night sleep. The house you can’t seem to get around to tidying.

Be patient and gentle with stupid people who can’t seem to make themselves love or want to love what is good, yourself first and foremost.

Jesus, help me want to want to love you. Help me want to want to hate anything opposed to you or your kingdom.

Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
Read full Article
post photo preview
Is Knowledge Possible (No ... And Yes)

I want to begin by admitting that I’m an amateur when it comes to epistemology. I do have a master’s degree in philosophy, but epistemology wasn’t my area of focus. Some of you reading this will know more about the subject than I do. And to be honest, I’m a little nervous about the comments. There’s a good chance that if you engage with what I’m about to say in any real depth, I won’t understand you and it will be my fault that I don’t.

Okay, with that admission out of the way…

 

We've long assumed that knowledge requires three criteria: (1) belief, (2) truth, and (3) justification. In other words, to know something is to believe it, for it to be true, and to have good reason for believing it. That’s the classical definition: justified true belief (JTB).

And just real quick, if you’re wondering why knowledge can’t be defined by just the first two criteria, it’s because believing something that happens to be true is more like getting lucky than knowledge. Imagine I say it’s raining in Adelaide, but I have no reason for thinking so. I didn’t check my weather app or ask anyone who lives there. If it turns out that it is raining, I was right, but only by chance. That’s not knowledge. To genuinely know something, you need more than belief and truth, you need a reason for thinking it’s true. You need justification.

Okay …

Along Comes Gettier

Now, for a long time, this three-part definition held up well. But then, in 1963, Edmund Gettier came along and broke everything in three pages. You can read that paper here.

Gettier presented scenarios where someone has a belief that is both true and justified, yet we still hesitate to call it knowledge. Why? Because the belief turns out to be true by accident.

One of the most well-known examples (though not from Gettier himself but often used to illustrate his point) is the case of the stopped clock. A man glances at a clock that has stopped working, sees that it says 2:00, and forms the belief that it is 2:00. And it just so happens to be 2:00. His belief is true. He used a normally reliable method, checking the time on a clock. And yet, the method failed. The belief was correct purely by coincidence.

Can We Save “Knowledge”

Now, some have tried to save the classical definition by saying, “Well, that wasn’t really justified. The clock was broken, so the belief was faulty from the start.” But that kind of move just shifts the problem. If we start redefining justification every time we hit a weird case, we risk making it so strict that it no longer resembles what anyone would call a “justified belief.”

Others, like Alvin Goldman, proposed ditching the concept of justification entirely. Maybe knowledge isn’t about having reasons, but about using processes that generally lead to truth. This is called reliabilism: if your belief comes from a trustworthy process (like vision, memory, or scientific inference) it counts as knowledge.

But again, the clock case poses a problem. Even if the process is usually reliable, it clearly failed here. So are we back to calling this knowledge, even though it was true by luck?

Still others have suggested that knowledge is less about having the right reasons or processes, and more about the person doing the knowing. This is what’s known as virtue epistemology: the idea that knowledge is a kind of intellectual success rooted in intellectual virtue: careful thinking, honesty, openness to evidence. On this view, knowing isn’t about checking boxes; it’s about doing something well. Like an archer hitting the bullseyes, not by accident, but through skill.

That’s compelling. But even here, questions linger. How do we measure intellectual virtue? And isn’t it still possible to do everything right and end up wrong—or to be wrong for the right reasons and still, somehow, stumble into truth?

An (Initially) Unsettling Realization

Which brings me to a more unsettling thought.

If a belief like “it’s 2:00” can be true, feel justified, come from a reliable process, and still be the product of a broken clock—what else might we be getting wrong without realizing it? Maybe the deeper problem is that we can always be deceived. Even our best faculties (sight, memory, reason etc.) can betray us. And if that’s the case, maybe knowledge (at least in the strong, philosophical sense) is impossible. Or if not impossible, impossible to know if and when you have it.

David Hume once said, “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” That strikes me as a sane and honest approach. The question isn’t whether I can be absolutely certain about what I believe, but whether I have good reasons for believing it—and whether I’m open to changing my mind if those reasons fall apart.

Some might find it unsettling—even scandalous—that we can’t achieve a God’s-eye view of the world. But honestly, what’s strange isn’t that we can’t see things with perfect clarity. It’s that we ever thought we should.

Maybe that’s why I find myself leaning toward fallibilism—the view that we can still know things, even while admitting we might be wrong. That kind of knowledge isn’t rigid or absolute, but humble and revisable. And that, to me, feels much closer to the way real life works.

So no, I’m not sure we need to cling too tightly to the word knowledge, at least not in the abstract, capital-K sense. What matters more is the posture we take toward the truth. That we pursue it carefully, honestly, and with a readiness to revise our beliefs when the evidence calls for it.

At least, that’s what I think I know.

 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals