Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #26: When God Works on Our Lives Like Frasier Crane’s Repairmen Work on His Apartment

Hello again, everyone. After my two latest posts on “Silent Hill” and “All Quiet on the Western Front”/“Joyeux Noël”, I have decided to do something simpler and lighthearted again. And the topic of this latest post came to mind just yesterday, as I watched another rerun of the popular sitcom starring Kelsey Grammer, “Frasier”. Today I will be revisiting that show and writing about the episode, “Kisses Sweeter Than Wine”.

In the episode, “Kisses Sweeter Than Wine”, the plot begins with the titular Frasier Crane wanting to be named president of an elitist wine club, which leads to him preparing his apartment to host a wine tasting. Frasier is finishing up the latest broadcast of his psychiatry radio show, and he makes the announcement to his producer, Roz Doyle (played by Peri Gilpin). As the two of them trade wisecracks and Frasier says that this is important for him, Roz replies “Since when? You used to say that club was nothing but a bunch of arrogant cork sniffing snobs”. “Well, that was before I got in”, quips Frasier. When the scene ends, we transition to Frasier back at his apartment with the rest of the main cast: Frasier’s fellow psychiatrist brother named Niles (played by David Hyde Pierce), their father and retired cop named Martin (played by John Mahoney), Martin’s hired housekeeper and physical therapist named Daphne Moon (played by Jane Leeves), and Martin Crane’s dog named Eddie (portrayed using two Jack Russell Terriers named Moose and Enzo). Frasier and Niles Crane are in the middle of readying the apartment for the wine tasting.

Right as the preparations are nearly complete, Frasier’s plan is figuratively scratched, when his brother accidentally leaves a literal scratch on his wood floor. Frasier notes that Martin’s beloved recliner chair is out of place and tells Niles to help him hoist it into Martin’s room. But being the prissier and physically weaker of the two brothers, Niles quickly buckles under the chair’s weight and drops it, scratching the wood floor. Martin sees no big deal. But Frasier is mortified: “Dad, you have no idea how critical these people can be. They love finding fault”. Niles offers, “there is still hope. I’ll bring my contractor by in the morning. Man’s a genius”.

And so begins Frasier’s quest to hire the contractor Joe DeCarlo, in order for his repairmen to fix the scratched floor and leave before all the guests arrive. Frasier requests that work be done by 5:00 sharp, with his guests arriving at 7. Frasier is pleased to hear that Joe expects to be finished by noon. One of the episode’s additional subplots involves Joe piquing Daphne’s romantic curiosity. This unsettles Niles, who spends the early seasons being secretly infatuated with Daphne and getting caught in various antics over it. He impulsively insinuates to Daphne that Joe is a womanizer, until his ethical conscience catches up to him and he clumsily tries to fix it.

When Frasier returns to his apartment later, he is bewildered and horrified to see that the workload has unexpectedly escalated. The scene begins with him in the elevator, happily conversing with two other repairmen. “Someone remodeling?”, he asks. “Nope. Bad wiring in one of the condos”, replies the first one. Frasier lets them know about the important guests he is inviting over tonight and asks if they will be done with the noisy work by evening. “Nah. Can’t make any promises. We’re here as long as this poor sap is willing to pay us”, answers the second. Frasier chuckles with them as they all leave the elevator… until he realizes they are all walking to the same door. Frasier suddenly hears the sounds of power drills and sees more workers inside: “What is happening!?”. Joe is still here: “Sorry about this, Dr. Crane. But when I plugged in the sander and started on the floor, you blew a circuit”. “So naturally you’re sawing a hole into my wall!?”, remarks Frasier. “When the circuit blew, it started a fire. You got some real bad wiring in here”, clarifies Joe. Meanwhile, the background subplot with Niles progresses. At one point, Frasier questions him on something and points out, “we both know that… that you must be telling the truth because… you’re such a slave to your ethics that even the slightest transgression would cause your nose to bleed”. Right at that moment, Niles claims his nose isn’t, suddenly sniffs through his nose, gets called out by Frasier, and claims he made a snort of contempt. But Frasier points out that a snort is outward and not inward, then Niles admits to not being straight with him. Afterwards, Frasier heads out for work and has Joe’s word that his apartment will be perfect by 5:30, when he returns.

When Frasier returns to his apartment again after work, he peers through his doorway and bugs his eyes out, upon seeing even more workers, some scaffolding, and his ceiling opened up with a guy working on it named Cecil. When questioned, Joe explains “When we opened up the wall to get at the faulty wiring, we found the gas pipes leading to your fireplace were cracked… had to be fixed”. When a dismayed Frasier asks “Tonight!?”, Martin wittily chimes in: “I okayed it. It just seemed wiser to do it before the explosion”. But the countdown is still ticking, for Niles shouts “Frasier, the club members arrive in forty-five minutes!”. Adding to the chaos, the Niles and Daphne subplot continues, with that segment even being titled “The Clot Thickens”. Niles and Martin see Daphne rebuffing Joe, because of Niles’ insinuations, which gives him a nosebleed attack and creates another thing to clean up. “Only the truth shall make you clot,” warns Frasier. While Niles tries to come clean with Daphne by the bathroom, they are interrupted by another worker named Bruce. Bruce asks for another available bathroom, is offered to use the master bathroom, and drops an indiscreet reference to his personal life before going, which makes it easier for Niles to vindicate Joe of being promiscuous and get the two back together.

Things are getting right down to the wire. When Frasier returns to Martin with a cut face, he rants: “I cut myself because I was shaving without water. And why was there no water? Because I had to move your chair, which gouged the floor, which made me call for Joe, who found bad pipes, which called for Cecil, who ate the cat that killed the rat that lived in the house that Frasier built!”. He then learns from Daphne that the guests’ vehicle has just arrived: “It’s over. Sing, fat lady, sing”. As an improvised saving throw, Martin gathers some hundred dollar bills from the brothers and offers it to the workers, if they pack up and leave soon enough. The workers pull it off, Frasier and Daphne are grateful to Martin and Niles, then Daphne heads out with Joe on a date.

Frasier’s guests finally arrive and everything has been cleared, at least seemingly. We cut to the POV of Frasier’s guests, which include some high-up politicians. They see the door open to reveal Frasier welcoming them to his “humble abode”. But suddenly, it turns out that the worker named Bruce was still in the bathroom and has only just now come out, appearing behind Frasier in front of his guests with a bare cardboard roll: “You know you’re out of T.P. in the can?”. Cut to the end credits, during which Niles now tries to help Frasier move Martin’s recliner back where it was. As the ending song plays over mute footage, Niles once again struggles with the weight, accidentally dropping the chair on Frasier’s wood floor again and hurting himself multiple times.

On a slightly humorous and more uplifting note, I could not help but notice that the way this "Frasier" episode's plot plays out seems to mirror the way God sometimes answers our prayers. We sometimes turn to God, asking to care for a relatively minor and/or superficial "scratch" that is bothering us. But when we allow God to get to work on our lives, he sometimes turns out to be interested in the deeper "faulty wiring" and "cracked gas pipes" in our lives or hearts, which we do not know or do not care about immediately. So we end up getting more than we bargained for, and at first, that can seem very much unwanted. Yet this other work turns out to be just as important, if not more important, than what we originally asked him to help us with. We may find ourselves grateful for that in the long run. Similarly, there are times where we might be annoyed that the "scratch" even came up and became another thing that requires our attention. That is, until we realize that us getting to work on that is what led to us realizing and getting help on those deeper things going on with us. In the long run, I imagine Frasier is a lot happier than he would be, had they not been privy "to do it before the explosion".

Me coming across that DVR-recorded rerun of "Frasier" seemed like perfect timing, since it is the start of 2025 and I have been coincidentally reminiscing on the my life's progress these past two years... along with how God seems to have been working on my life in a similar manner as Joe DeCarlo's team works on Frasier's apartment. At around the end of 2022, my life journey was in a stagnant state. While thinking about Bishop Barron's sermons on the "invasion" of God's grace and the way Jesus enters the boat of Simon Peter, I started praying to God. I expressed that I had no idea what I should do next with my life and asked that God would send something to "invade" my current livelihood, so I can be reactively steered closer to where he wants me to be. Shortly afterwards, at the start of 2023, something inconvenient occurred related to my job. That "scratch" on my "wooden floor" involved my workplace suddenly requiring my coworkers and I to get some personal information re-verified and re-submitted for the company. Some of my coworkers and I were quite annoyed at the apparent pointlessness of it. But in the process of getting my reevaluation, I ended up meeting someone who entered my life and became a very helpful life coach for me. This was the catalyst to me having the advice and encouragement to start branching out and progressing in other areas of my life, over the next two years. The talks he gave started to help me tend to the "wiring" and "pipes" in my life, when I was originally feeling irritated by the "scratch" I set out to address.

Besides the first “scratch” I elaborated on in the previous paragraph, there was a second one I addressed during those last two years. I spent a lot of my young adult years grappling with that second "scratch" in my life, which I wanted God to remove just so things could go back to being easy and making sense as they seemed before. However, it is as if God wanted me to open up to him more and recognize my need to have some "faulty wiring" and "cracked pipes" underneath the "scratch" be addressed, rather than settling for just the scratch's removal. In the Summer of 2023, I finally made it a point to follow my father's example and start aiming for Confession every two weeks. It became an opportunity for me to practice relying more on God's grace and spending more quality time with him in the sacraments. From there, I allowed myself to undergo further revelations and welcome God's help in fixing those deeper facets. While that second "scratch" is still there, God fixing the "wires" and "pipes" associated with it has helped me to accept the inconvenience of the "scratch" with a much better attitude and rest assured that the far more important things were addressed.

In fact, even the way I came across this very Locals community is as though God gave me a gift I never knew I wanted, along the way of tending to yet another issue I perceived. Originally, I spend a great deal of 2024 looking for ways I could try to reach out to Catholic apologists I have followed, such as Christopher West, Father Mike Schmitz, Trent Horn, and Matt Fradd. I wanted to reach out to one of them, in order to share some questions and concerns that were weighing on my mind. Towards the end of 2024, I did manage to finally reach out to Trent Horn on his Catholic Answers Live podcast and at least have a conversation with him about the subject, which helped me feel a lot better. During the preceding Summer of 2024, when I was still in the middle of searching, I happened to discover the link to Matt Fradd's online Pints With Aquinas community on Locals. It is then that I got the idea to join this community. From there, I got to meet a lot of good fellow Catholics, interact with Matt Fradd for other things, find a lot more people to pray for and receive prayers from, plus discover a new hobby in writing posts like this weekly "Pop-Cultured Catholic" series. All of this happened, as a detour to me setting out to address a third issue on my mind. It is as if God used my concerns about an unrelated topic to lead me here, and I am happy to have found this community. Thank you all, and here's to a hopefully great new year of 2025. God bless… and goodnight, Seattle.

🎶 Hey baby, I hear the blues a-callin'. Tossed salads and scrambled eggs. Quite stylish… And maybe I seem a bit confused. Yeah maybe, but I got you pegged! Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha! But I don't know what to do with those tossed salads and scrambled eggs. They're callin' again. See you next year, we love ya! 🎶

And by the way, these were the only two clips of the episode I was able to find, during a brief search on YouTube...

1.) When Niles Accidentally Gets the Floor Scratched:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8bDxHekTVc

2.) Frasier's Rant About "...the house that Frasier built!":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuTuf444Th8

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Nine Years In - Taking Stock of My Priestly Life - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

I was ordained on May 21, 2016 . . . as I celebrated an anniversary this past month, I prayed a bit about what the Lord has done, is doing, and might do in my life. What gives life? What deals death? And then, well, I pushed record. Here's what come out : )

00:19:22
Sneak Peek: Tammy Peterson

This Wednesday I'll release my interview with Tammy Peterson here on Locals. Thanks for being a member of Locals.

00:00:58
The Human Excellence that Technology Can Never Replace - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Squad, I've been thinking about AI lately. It's not that I understand the technology, though I am trying some, but that my limited understanding has given me occasion to think specifically about what is distinctive to the human person. And, it turns out, those distinctive notes are incredibly precious. In this video, I'm think about our call to conversation for intimacy . . . look forward to chatting with you there.

00:21:22
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

I need some prayers. I finished my book, finally. It took me seven years to write. It’s about my journey with latened hearing loss and how my faith sustained me. I submitted it to Ignatius Press. I will hear back in 3-6 months.
If they don’t publish it, I will try other Catholic publishers.

A straight up miracle happened and there is no way anyone will convince me otherwise! I am in Clearwater, Fl. I was in the Gulf with my aqua pack cochlear implants. I turned around and a wave hit me. I lost my processor. I lost all hope but started pleading with God. Mike refused to give up and keeps searching. I said the St. Anthony prayer three times. I begged God to let it wash up on shore. I was even trying to track it with the app!!

Suddenly, this man appears with it in his hand. I burst into tears, thanking him. He refused to take any cash as a reward. I hugged him and couldn’t stop saying thank you. That’s $10k I would have had to come up with on my own because the only thing I cannot do is lose them. It was totally my fault. I should have worn the clips they gave me for it. Anyway, miracles do happen. How else would someone find something so small in the Gulf?!

Matt, now is the time to ask Candace to be on your show! She just mentioned in her episode yesterday how she wants to go on lots of Catholic channels and talk the faith etc!

That would be a very fun episode!

post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Life is very, very simple, actually.

There is a lot going on. We are confused about many things. Embarrassed that we are confused. Pretend not to be. Have a few soundbites we can rely on when the conversation turns to Trump or the state of the Church or what is going on in Israel and Gaza or the AI revolution. We hope they don’t press us because we know enough to answer two or three questions before they will hit bedrock and we will have nothing.

All of this can lead us to believe the lie that life is complicated. And since we cannot figure it out, we should either quit, or numb, or pretend, or run ourselves ragged trying to understand everything we think we should understand.

And yet life is simple. Very, very simple. There is very little to figure out.

Love what is good. Hate what is evil. But how? When I have willingly habituated myself to do the opposite. Pray. Repent. Keep turning away from distractions. Don’t hate yourself for failing. Hope in the good God who is better than you think He is. Who cares for you more than you think He does.

What are your duties? Do them with joy and attention. Don’t hate yourself when you fail at this. Pray. Repent. Have a sense of humor about your littleness. You are incredibly loved after all, remember?

Turn away from what is useless and petty and vulgar and think about what is excellent.

Say “Your will be done” 100 times a day, especially when things are bad or seem meaningless. Your headache. Your bad night sleep. The house you can’t seem to get around to tidying.

Be patient and gentle with stupid people who can’t seem to make themselves love or want to love what is good, yourself first and foremost.

Jesus, help me want to want to love you. Help me want to want to hate anything opposed to you or your kingdom.

Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
Read full Article
post photo preview
Is Knowledge Possible (No ... And Yes)

I want to begin by admitting that I’m an amateur when it comes to epistemology. I do have a master’s degree in philosophy, but epistemology wasn’t my area of focus. Some of you reading this will know more about the subject than I do. And to be honest, I’m a little nervous about the comments. There’s a good chance that if you engage with what I’m about to say in any real depth, I won’t understand you and it will be my fault that I don’t.

Okay, with that admission out of the way…

 

We've long assumed that knowledge requires three criteria: (1) belief, (2) truth, and (3) justification. In other words, to know something is to believe it, for it to be true, and to have good reason for believing it. That’s the classical definition: justified true belief (JTB).

And just real quick, if you’re wondering why knowledge can’t be defined by just the first two criteria, it’s because believing something that happens to be true is more like getting lucky than knowledge. Imagine I say it’s raining in Adelaide, but I have no reason for thinking so. I didn’t check my weather app or ask anyone who lives there. If it turns out that it is raining, I was right, but only by chance. That’s not knowledge. To genuinely know something, you need more than belief and truth, you need a reason for thinking it’s true. You need justification.

Okay …

Along Comes Gettier

Now, for a long time, this three-part definition held up well. But then, in 1963, Edmund Gettier came along and broke everything in three pages. You can read that paper here.

Gettier presented scenarios where someone has a belief that is both true and justified, yet we still hesitate to call it knowledge. Why? Because the belief turns out to be true by accident.

One of the most well-known examples (though not from Gettier himself but often used to illustrate his point) is the case of the stopped clock. A man glances at a clock that has stopped working, sees that it says 2:00, and forms the belief that it is 2:00. And it just so happens to be 2:00. His belief is true. He used a normally reliable method, checking the time on a clock. And yet, the method failed. The belief was correct purely by coincidence.

Can We Save “Knowledge”

Now, some have tried to save the classical definition by saying, “Well, that wasn’t really justified. The clock was broken, so the belief was faulty from the start.” But that kind of move just shifts the problem. If we start redefining justification every time we hit a weird case, we risk making it so strict that it no longer resembles what anyone would call a “justified belief.”

Others, like Alvin Goldman, proposed ditching the concept of justification entirely. Maybe knowledge isn’t about having reasons, but about using processes that generally lead to truth. This is called reliabilism: if your belief comes from a trustworthy process (like vision, memory, or scientific inference) it counts as knowledge.

But again, the clock case poses a problem. Even if the process is usually reliable, it clearly failed here. So are we back to calling this knowledge, even though it was true by luck?

Still others have suggested that knowledge is less about having the right reasons or processes, and more about the person doing the knowing. This is what’s known as virtue epistemology: the idea that knowledge is a kind of intellectual success rooted in intellectual virtue: careful thinking, honesty, openness to evidence. On this view, knowing isn’t about checking boxes; it’s about doing something well. Like an archer hitting the bullseyes, not by accident, but through skill.

That’s compelling. But even here, questions linger. How do we measure intellectual virtue? And isn’t it still possible to do everything right and end up wrong—or to be wrong for the right reasons and still, somehow, stumble into truth?

An (Initially) Unsettling Realization

Which brings me to a more unsettling thought.

If a belief like “it’s 2:00” can be true, feel justified, come from a reliable process, and still be the product of a broken clock—what else might we be getting wrong without realizing it? Maybe the deeper problem is that we can always be deceived. Even our best faculties (sight, memory, reason etc.) can betray us. And if that’s the case, maybe knowledge (at least in the strong, philosophical sense) is impossible. Or if not impossible, impossible to know if and when you have it.

David Hume once said, “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” That strikes me as a sane and honest approach. The question isn’t whether I can be absolutely certain about what I believe, but whether I have good reasons for believing it—and whether I’m open to changing my mind if those reasons fall apart.

Some might find it unsettling—even scandalous—that we can’t achieve a God’s-eye view of the world. But honestly, what’s strange isn’t that we can’t see things with perfect clarity. It’s that we ever thought we should.

Maybe that’s why I find myself leaning toward fallibilism—the view that we can still know things, even while admitting we might be wrong. That kind of knowledge isn’t rigid or absolute, but humble and revisable. And that, to me, feels much closer to the way real life works.

So no, I’m not sure we need to cling too tightly to the word knowledge, at least not in the abstract, capital-K sense. What matters more is the posture we take toward the truth. That we pursue it carefully, honestly, and with a readiness to revise our beliefs when the evidence calls for it.

At least, that’s what I think I know.

 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals