Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #25: “All Quiet on the Western Front”, “Joyeux Noël”, and God’s Entry Into Man’s Fallenness on Christmas Day

In the wake of our latest Christmas right before New Year’s Day, I wanted to do at least one post that was more overtly Christmas themed. While perusing my mental catalog of Christmas classics, I recalled 2005’s French historical war drama, “Joyeux Noël”. That film has particularly resonated with me, having also read the famous anti-war novel, “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Maria Remarque.

For starters, I read “All Quiet on the Western Front” back when I was in High School, and I still remember some of the specific points I explored in my English essay. Up until that point, most of my knowledge and passion to learn has been centered around WWII, with me not learning nearly as much about the preceding “Great War”, until my Social Studies classes around the same time. Those Social Studies classes and my reading of Remarque’s novel helped me to see how WWI became reputed as a much more morally grey conflict than WWII, where armies of soldiers were often needlessly thrown into the squalid meat grinders of trench warfare, only for neither side to even gain any ground. There have also been a few movie adaptations of the novel, the latest of which is the 2022 German film that I recently watched on Netflix.

The narrative of "All Quiet on the Western Front" centers around a fictional soldier named Paul Bäumer, who gets swept up into volunteering for the Imperial German Army with his friends by pseudo-patriotic rhetoric, only to be traumatized and disillusioned by the hellish reality of war. The book showcases in full gritty detail all the horrors of war, which defy the promises of glory and honor Paul's comrades were sold. Death is random and dispassionate, taking the lives of anyone at any time, no matter how strong, courageous, or righteous one is perceived to be. Flooding, disease, muck, rats, and gore abound. Reading the descriptions of this has helped me to even more easily imagine how J.R.R. Tolkien was inspired to write the Dead Marshes scene in "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers", after witnessing such imagery himself as a British WWI soldier. One major theme highlighted in Remarque's novel is the perniciousness of blind nationalism, which goes beyond being proud and patriotic for one's country, to the degree that one's national identity and leaders are warped into an idol to worship. That is, at the expense of valuing human life, family, God, the truths about other peoples, and one's moral integrity. Even in the rare instances when Paul Bäumer gets a reprieve, being allowed to visit and rest in civilian settlements, shell shock and the loss of many friends leave him unable to interact well with the oblivious civilians. One of the few things to grant him fleeting comfort is the camaraderie and friendships he forms with some fellow soldiers.

One of the most famous and pivotal scenes from the book is the moment when Paul Bäumer is fighting French forces and mortally wounds an enemy soldier in hand-to-hand combat for the first time. Until this point in the story, Bäumer has never had to look squarely into the face of an enemy soldier and watch him slowly die before his eyes. When the Frenchman does not immediately die, but is nonetheless too weak to pose a threat, Paul is overcome with guilt and compassion, trying in vain to bandage his wounds and give him water. When the man dies, Paul examines the man's identification to learn that his name is Gérard Duval and he was once a printer by trade with a family. The experience is made worse as he is forced to hide inside the foxhole with Gérard's corpse for a period of time, lest he is picked off. This scene is one of the major catalysts to him realizing the evil and emptiness of the war propaganda he's been fed, which would dehumanize the enemy and promote pride in slaying and dying for one's government. He even bargains with the thought of eventually tracking down the man's family to pay them recompense. To reference another scene from Tolkien's The Two Towers, a similar sentiment is shared through the pondering of Samwise Gamgee, when he and Frodo witness a skirmish between Gondorian rangers and the Haradrim (Southron men who have allied with the Dark Lord Sauron and ride atop the mûmakil, a.k.a. oliphaunts). "It was Sam's first view of a battle of Men against Men, and he did not like it much". After seeing one Haradrim soldier get shot and fall down next to him, "He was glad that he could not see the dead face. He wondered what the man's name was and where he came from; and if he was really evil of heart, or what lies or threats had led him on the long march from his home; and if he would not really rather have stayed there in peace". This dialogue is incorporated into a scene reserved for the Extended Edition of Peter Jackson's film adaptation, which I will also link.

The book ends on a tragic note, where Paul Bäumer dies near the very end of the war, followed by the scene which gives the book its name. By the final chapters, Paul has lost even more comrades and it becomes clear that Germany's defeat is inevitable, for they can only delay the armistice at most. Despite the leaders above learning that the armistice is coming, soldiers on both sides are still ordered to stand guard and shoot to kill. And on one otherwise perfectly peaceful day, Paul is fatally shot, displaying a calm expression on his face "as though almost glad the end had come". With Bäumer being the only casualty, his death is considered so statistically insignificant that the frontline report simply states "All quiet on the Western Front". In 2022's German film adaptation, there is an added subplot where the general leading Paul's unit spitefully orders them to make one final charge on Armistice Day, sacrificing more lives in hopes that the war will end on one last German victory to vainly boast about.

With "All Quiet on the Western Front" still in my mind, it amplified the uplifting sense I felt years later, when I watched the French film "Joyeux Noël" ("Merry Christmas" ), based on the Christmas truce of December 1914. The film begins by first establishing the three countries, multiple characters from which will give their perspectives. In that introductory scene, schoolboys from France, England, then Germany each recite a jingoistic and/or xenophobic war poem, artistically illustrating the mentalities prevalent in those times and the harm they can pose to youth. From the three countries shown comes the movie's cast, which includes French Lieutenant Audebert, Lieutenant Gordon of Britain's Royal Scots Fusiliers, Scottish priest Father Palmer (who also serves as a British stretcher-bearer), Jewish German Lieutenant Horstmayer, German opera tenor Nikolaus Sprink, and Danish opera soprano Anna Sørensen (who is engaged to Nikolaus). The movie's first act showcases a taste of the same horrors outlined in "All Quiet on the Western Front", with one subplot following two Scottish brothers, one of whom gets killed in a battle between the British/French and the Germans. As the plot unfolds, soldiers on all sides lament that the war's continuation will deny them any possibility of seeing their families back at home, while Christmas Eve arrives. Hoping to boost morale, Scots in the British army begin to sing and play festive songs, while Sprink and Sørensen perform for the German line, with both groups being within earshot of each other. With religion and music being a common language, this catalyzes a series of events in the film, where soldiers on all sides call for a ceasefire. Amidst this ceasefire and celebrations, the soldiers all have a chance to lay down their arms and enjoy a brief period of time to fraternize with their enemies. The film ends on a bittersweet note, when the inevitable reality sets in that their soldiers' superiors are not swayed and will order them to resume fighting in the following days. One of the more unsettling implications is a reminder that the German Lieutenant Horstmayer is also a Jew, who is relocated by angry superiors and may eventually return to a Germany where Hitler rises to power.

Towards the very end of the film, when the protagonists are facing pushback from their warmongering peers and superiors, I find this contrast between Father Palmer and the bishop above him to be particularly hard-hitting. Father Palmer is sent back to his own parish and the unit he served is shamefully disbanded. Palmer is then rebuked by his bishop, who rejects his sentiment of goodwill towards the truce and delivers a misguided hate-filled sermon: "Christ our Lord said, 'Think not that I come to bring peace on earth. I come not to bring peace, but a sword.' The Gospel according to St. Matthew. Well, my brethren, the sword of the Lord is in your hands. You are the very defenders of civilization itself. The forces of good against the forces of evil. For this war is indeed a crusade! A holy war to save the freedom of the world. In truth I tell you: the Germans do not act like us, neither do they think like us, for they are not, like us, children of God. Are those who shell cities populated only by civilians the children of God? Are those who advanced armed hiding behind women and children the children of God? With God's help, you must kill the Germans, good or bad, young or old. Kill every one of them so that it won't have to be done again. The Lord be with you". These words were reportedly based on a real sermon by an Anglican bishop in Westminster Abbey, and the scene apparently leaves out excerpts that were even worse. While this strikes me, in-part due to it being another example of influential Christians violating the values of Christ, the middle part where he questions whether certain people are even the children of God especially gets to me. While I have not fallen into the trap of forgetting that whole groups of people are God's children, I have sometimes felt tempted to forget that certain individuals are still fellow children of God, even when they do horrendous things. Back when I was a kid, I remember my mom telling me that we are even supposed to love Saddam Hussein. So I find that scene particularly effective as a cautionary tale of what not to be like.

Overall, "Joyeux Noël" is an echo of the very meaning behind Christmas, which ultimately gives the holiday its power: Amidst the worst of fallen mankind's brokenness, our Creator himself was willing to take flesh and enter into our dysfunction behind enemy lines as a meek baby, intending to both teach us and offer himself as a gift to save the world from sin and death, purely out of unearned love. When people are asked to define what the meaning of Christmas is, answers typically begin with a reference to it being a day of peace, generosity, hope, and goodwill towards all men. These are all important qualities which emanate from the spirit of Christmas. That being said, what are all of these things rooted in and what makes Christmas unique from other holidays which express these ideals? At the very least, it is the belief that mankind is dignified and beloved enough for God to make such a gift of himself, which fuels it. It is the beginning of the story which climaxes in Easter, showing that all the death, violence, scapegoating, poverty, selfishness, prejudice, tyranny, idolatry, hatred, and apathy in the world do not have the final say. While I do not think every Christmas movie needs to spell out Christ's part in Christmas to be a masterpiece and fulfill its purpose (one example being Chuck Jones' adaptation of "How the Grinch Stole Christmas!" ), one should still keep that part in mind. If those sentiments associated with Christmas were completely detached from the belief in Christ's birth, mission, and identity as Man's savior, would they have relayed the kind of power strongly enough to bring people to their senses, even amidst the atrocity that was WWI? The very atrocity which "All Quiet on the Western Front" puts on full gruesome display? Arguably, that truce which halted the Great War itself could be seen as another ripple effect of God's grace entering into our worst dysfunctions.

To end this post, I will link YouTube videos and a blog post showing a couple trailers and detailing three of the key scenes my analysis referenced from "All Quiet on the Western Front", "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers", and "Joyeux Noël"...

1.) Trailer for 2022's Adaptation of "All Quiet on the Western Front":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf8EYbVxtCY

2.) Paul Bäumer Stabs French Soldier in 2022 Adaptation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BukhPgF7su0

3.) French Soldier Scene Continues:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6d0WUM6dwU

4.) Faramir Killing the Haradrim Soldier, Then Reciting Tolkien's Words in Peter Jackson's Extended Edition of The Two Towers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVpCeQqluf8

5.) Trailer for "Joyeux Noël":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRrr-CDXijs

6.) A Blog Post By Padre Steve About the Bishop Scene in "Joyeux Noël":
https://padresteve.com/2015/12/25/joyeux-noel-i-belong-here-with-those-in-pain-who-have-lost-their-faith/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Nine Years In - Taking Stock of My Priestly Life - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

I was ordained on May 21, 2016 . . . as I celebrated an anniversary this past month, I prayed a bit about what the Lord has done, is doing, and might do in my life. What gives life? What deals death? And then, well, I pushed record. Here's what come out : )

00:19:22
Sneak Peek: Tammy Peterson

This Wednesday I'll release my interview with Tammy Peterson here on Locals. Thanks for being a member of Locals.

00:00:58
The Human Excellence that Technology Can Never Replace - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Squad, I've been thinking about AI lately. It's not that I understand the technology, though I am trying some, but that my limited understanding has given me occasion to think specifically about what is distinctive to the human person. And, it turns out, those distinctive notes are incredibly precious. In this video, I'm think about our call to conversation for intimacy . . . look forward to chatting with you there.

00:21:22
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

Last day of the month of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. This photo is from the beautiful Sacred Heart Church in Conroe, Texas where we serve and attend mass ❤️

My very anti-Catholic family members, including my aunt who so often comes after me about being Catholic, are in Rome right now and just their day visiting The Vatican, the Sistine Chapel, and St. Peter's Basilica.

May the Lord use this vacation to soften their hearts towards Catholicism.

Little nuggets....little nods from God letting me know that He's here, He's listening, He cares, He knows, and He's got this:

My 17 year old daughter is agnostic, if not outright atheist. It isn't so much an "I don't believe in God" as it is an "I don't care whether or not there is a God." However, she comes to me for advice and moral support (where she wants it, but hey, at least she comes to me). But, yesterday took me by surprise. She was on the phone with a friend and came looking for me. Her friend asked me to pray for her father who is in the hospital with sepsis. I took the phone and stepped outside away from my daughter, thinking she'd be uncomfortable with me praying, but she followed me, and while she didn't join me in prayer, she seemed very grateful. She may not have faith in God, but she has faith in my faith in God, and that's something.

I've been praying deliverance prayers over my house, family, and property. I'm no stranger to demonic attacks. Most of the time...

post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
post photo preview
Life is very, very simple, actually.

There is a lot going on. We are confused about many things. Embarrassed that we are confused. Pretend not to be. Have a few soundbites we can rely on when the conversation turns to Trump or the state of the Church or what is going on in Israel and Gaza or the AI revolution. We hope they don’t press us because we know enough to answer two or three questions before they will hit bedrock and we will have nothing.

All of this can lead us to believe the lie that life is complicated. And since we cannot figure it out, we should either quit, or numb, or pretend, or run ourselves ragged trying to understand everything we think we should understand.

And yet life is simple. Very, very simple. There is very little to figure out.

Love what is good. Hate what is evil. But how? When I have willingly habituated myself to do the opposite. Pray. Repent. Keep turning away from distractions. Don’t hate yourself for failing. Hope in the good God who is better than you think He is. Who cares for you more than you think He does.

What are your duties? Do them with joy and attention. Don’t hate yourself when you fail at this. Pray. Repent. Have a sense of humor about your littleness. You are incredibly loved after all, remember?

Turn away from what is useless and petty and vulgar and think about what is excellent.

Say “Your will be done” 100 times a day, especially when things are bad or seem meaningless. Your headache. Your bad night sleep. The house you can’t seem to get around to tidying.

Be patient and gentle with stupid people who can’t seem to make themselves love or want to love what is good, yourself first and foremost.

Jesus, help me want to want to love you. Help me want to want to hate anything opposed to you or your kingdom.

Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
Read full Article
post photo preview
Is Knowledge Possible (No ... And Yes)

I want to begin by admitting that I’m an amateur when it comes to epistemology. I do have a master’s degree in philosophy, but epistemology wasn’t my area of focus. Some of you reading this will know more about the subject than I do. And to be honest, I’m a little nervous about the comments. There’s a good chance that if you engage with what I’m about to say in any real depth, I won’t understand you and it will be my fault that I don’t.

Okay, with that admission out of the way…

 

We've long assumed that knowledge requires three criteria: (1) belief, (2) truth, and (3) justification. In other words, to know something is to believe it, for it to be true, and to have good reason for believing it. That’s the classical definition: justified true belief (JTB).

And just real quick, if you’re wondering why knowledge can’t be defined by just the first two criteria, it’s because believing something that happens to be true is more like getting lucky than knowledge. Imagine I say it’s raining in Adelaide, but I have no reason for thinking so. I didn’t check my weather app or ask anyone who lives there. If it turns out that it is raining, I was right, but only by chance. That’s not knowledge. To genuinely know something, you need more than belief and truth, you need a reason for thinking it’s true. You need justification.

Okay …

Along Comes Gettier

Now, for a long time, this three-part definition held up well. But then, in 1963, Edmund Gettier came along and broke everything in three pages. You can read that paper here.

Gettier presented scenarios where someone has a belief that is both true and justified, yet we still hesitate to call it knowledge. Why? Because the belief turns out to be true by accident.

One of the most well-known examples (though not from Gettier himself but often used to illustrate his point) is the case of the stopped clock. A man glances at a clock that has stopped working, sees that it says 2:00, and forms the belief that it is 2:00. And it just so happens to be 2:00. His belief is true. He used a normally reliable method, checking the time on a clock. And yet, the method failed. The belief was correct purely by coincidence.

Can We Save “Knowledge”

Now, some have tried to save the classical definition by saying, “Well, that wasn’t really justified. The clock was broken, so the belief was faulty from the start.” But that kind of move just shifts the problem. If we start redefining justification every time we hit a weird case, we risk making it so strict that it no longer resembles what anyone would call a “justified belief.”

Others, like Alvin Goldman, proposed ditching the concept of justification entirely. Maybe knowledge isn’t about having reasons, but about using processes that generally lead to truth. This is called reliabilism: if your belief comes from a trustworthy process (like vision, memory, or scientific inference) it counts as knowledge.

But again, the clock case poses a problem. Even if the process is usually reliable, it clearly failed here. So are we back to calling this knowledge, even though it was true by luck?

Still others have suggested that knowledge is less about having the right reasons or processes, and more about the person doing the knowing. This is what’s known as virtue epistemology: the idea that knowledge is a kind of intellectual success rooted in intellectual virtue: careful thinking, honesty, openness to evidence. On this view, knowing isn’t about checking boxes; it’s about doing something well. Like an archer hitting the bullseyes, not by accident, but through skill.

That’s compelling. But even here, questions linger. How do we measure intellectual virtue? And isn’t it still possible to do everything right and end up wrong—or to be wrong for the right reasons and still, somehow, stumble into truth?

An (Initially) Unsettling Realization

Which brings me to a more unsettling thought.

If a belief like “it’s 2:00” can be true, feel justified, come from a reliable process, and still be the product of a broken clock—what else might we be getting wrong without realizing it? Maybe the deeper problem is that we can always be deceived. Even our best faculties (sight, memory, reason etc.) can betray us. And if that’s the case, maybe knowledge (at least in the strong, philosophical sense) is impossible. Or if not impossible, impossible to know if and when you have it.

David Hume once said, “A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.” That strikes me as a sane and honest approach. The question isn’t whether I can be absolutely certain about what I believe, but whether I have good reasons for believing it—and whether I’m open to changing my mind if those reasons fall apart.

Some might find it unsettling—even scandalous—that we can’t achieve a God’s-eye view of the world. But honestly, what’s strange isn’t that we can’t see things with perfect clarity. It’s that we ever thought we should.

Maybe that’s why I find myself leaning toward fallibilism—the view that we can still know things, even while admitting we might be wrong. That kind of knowledge isn’t rigid or absolute, but humble and revisable. And that, to me, feels much closer to the way real life works.

So no, I’m not sure we need to cling too tightly to the word knowledge, at least not in the abstract, capital-K sense. What matters more is the posture we take toward the truth. That we pursue it carefully, honestly, and with a readiness to revise our beliefs when the evidence calls for it.

At least, that’s what I think I know.

 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals