Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #25: “All Quiet on the Western Front”, “Joyeux Noël”, and God’s Entry Into Man’s Fallenness on Christmas Day

In the wake of our latest Christmas right before New Year’s Day, I wanted to do at least one post that was more overtly Christmas themed. While perusing my mental catalog of Christmas classics, I recalled 2005’s French historical war drama, “Joyeux Noël”. That film has particularly resonated with me, having also read the famous anti-war novel, “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Maria Remarque.

For starters, I read “All Quiet on the Western Front” back when I was in High School, and I still remember some of the specific points I explored in my English essay. Up until that point, most of my knowledge and passion to learn has been centered around WWII, with me not learning nearly as much about the preceding “Great War”, until my Social Studies classes around the same time. Those Social Studies classes and my reading of Remarque’s novel helped me to see how WWI became reputed as a much more morally grey conflict than WWII, where armies of soldiers were often needlessly thrown into the squalid meat grinders of trench warfare, only for neither side to even gain any ground. There have also been a few movie adaptations of the novel, the latest of which is the 2022 German film that I recently watched on Netflix.

The narrative of "All Quiet on the Western Front" centers around a fictional soldier named Paul Bäumer, who gets swept up into volunteering for the Imperial German Army with his friends by pseudo-patriotic rhetoric, only to be traumatized and disillusioned by the hellish reality of war. The book showcases in full gritty detail all the horrors of war, which defy the promises of glory and honor Paul's comrades were sold. Death is random and dispassionate, taking the lives of anyone at any time, no matter how strong, courageous, or righteous one is perceived to be. Flooding, disease, muck, rats, and gore abound. Reading the descriptions of this has helped me to even more easily imagine how J.R.R. Tolkien was inspired to write the Dead Marshes scene in "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers", after witnessing such imagery himself as a British WWI soldier. One major theme highlighted in Remarque's novel is the perniciousness of blind nationalism, which goes beyond being proud and patriotic for one's country, to the degree that one's national identity and leaders are warped into an idol to worship. That is, at the expense of valuing human life, family, God, the truths about other peoples, and one's moral integrity. Even in the rare instances when Paul Bäumer gets a reprieve, being allowed to visit and rest in civilian settlements, shell shock and the loss of many friends leave him unable to interact well with the oblivious civilians. One of the few things to grant him fleeting comfort is the camaraderie and friendships he forms with some fellow soldiers.

One of the most famous and pivotal scenes from the book is the moment when Paul Bäumer is fighting French forces and mortally wounds an enemy soldier in hand-to-hand combat for the first time. Until this point in the story, Bäumer has never had to look squarely into the face of an enemy soldier and watch him slowly die before his eyes. When the Frenchman does not immediately die, but is nonetheless too weak to pose a threat, Paul is overcome with guilt and compassion, trying in vain to bandage his wounds and give him water. When the man dies, Paul examines the man's identification to learn that his name is Gérard Duval and he was once a printer by trade with a family. The experience is made worse as he is forced to hide inside the foxhole with Gérard's corpse for a period of time, lest he is picked off. This scene is one of the major catalysts to him realizing the evil and emptiness of the war propaganda he's been fed, which would dehumanize the enemy and promote pride in slaying and dying for one's government. He even bargains with the thought of eventually tracking down the man's family to pay them recompense. To reference another scene from Tolkien's The Two Towers, a similar sentiment is shared through the pondering of Samwise Gamgee, when he and Frodo witness a skirmish between Gondorian rangers and the Haradrim (Southron men who have allied with the Dark Lord Sauron and ride atop the mûmakil, a.k.a. oliphaunts). "It was Sam's first view of a battle of Men against Men, and he did not like it much". After seeing one Haradrim soldier get shot and fall down next to him, "He was glad that he could not see the dead face. He wondered what the man's name was and where he came from; and if he was really evil of heart, or what lies or threats had led him on the long march from his home; and if he would not really rather have stayed there in peace". This dialogue is incorporated into a scene reserved for the Extended Edition of Peter Jackson's film adaptation, which I will also link.

The book ends on a tragic note, where Paul Bäumer dies near the very end of the war, followed by the scene which gives the book its name. By the final chapters, Paul has lost even more comrades and it becomes clear that Germany's defeat is inevitable, for they can only delay the armistice at most. Despite the leaders above learning that the armistice is coming, soldiers on both sides are still ordered to stand guard and shoot to kill. And on one otherwise perfectly peaceful day, Paul is fatally shot, displaying a calm expression on his face "as though almost glad the end had come". With Bäumer being the only casualty, his death is considered so statistically insignificant that the frontline report simply states "All quiet on the Western Front". In 2022's German film adaptation, there is an added subplot where the general leading Paul's unit spitefully orders them to make one final charge on Armistice Day, sacrificing more lives in hopes that the war will end on one last German victory to vainly boast about.

With "All Quiet on the Western Front" still in my mind, it amplified the uplifting sense I felt years later, when I watched the French film "Joyeux Noël" ("Merry Christmas" ), based on the Christmas truce of December 1914. The film begins by first establishing the three countries, multiple characters from which will give their perspectives. In that introductory scene, schoolboys from France, England, then Germany each recite a jingoistic and/or xenophobic war poem, artistically illustrating the mentalities prevalent in those times and the harm they can pose to youth. From the three countries shown comes the movie's cast, which includes French Lieutenant Audebert, Lieutenant Gordon of Britain's Royal Scots Fusiliers, Scottish priest Father Palmer (who also serves as a British stretcher-bearer), Jewish German Lieutenant Horstmayer, German opera tenor Nikolaus Sprink, and Danish opera soprano Anna Sørensen (who is engaged to Nikolaus). The movie's first act showcases a taste of the same horrors outlined in "All Quiet on the Western Front", with one subplot following two Scottish brothers, one of whom gets killed in a battle between the British/French and the Germans. As the plot unfolds, soldiers on all sides lament that the war's continuation will deny them any possibility of seeing their families back at home, while Christmas Eve arrives. Hoping to boost morale, Scots in the British army begin to sing and play festive songs, while Sprink and Sørensen perform for the German line, with both groups being within earshot of each other. With religion and music being a common language, this catalyzes a series of events in the film, where soldiers on all sides call for a ceasefire. Amidst this ceasefire and celebrations, the soldiers all have a chance to lay down their arms and enjoy a brief period of time to fraternize with their enemies. The film ends on a bittersweet note, when the inevitable reality sets in that their soldiers' superiors are not swayed and will order them to resume fighting in the following days. One of the more unsettling implications is a reminder that the German Lieutenant Horstmayer is also a Jew, who is relocated by angry superiors and may eventually return to a Germany where Hitler rises to power.

Towards the very end of the film, when the protagonists are facing pushback from their warmongering peers and superiors, I find this contrast between Father Palmer and the bishop above him to be particularly hard-hitting. Father Palmer is sent back to his own parish and the unit he served is shamefully disbanded. Palmer is then rebuked by his bishop, who rejects his sentiment of goodwill towards the truce and delivers a misguided hate-filled sermon: "Christ our Lord said, 'Think not that I come to bring peace on earth. I come not to bring peace, but a sword.' The Gospel according to St. Matthew. Well, my brethren, the sword of the Lord is in your hands. You are the very defenders of civilization itself. The forces of good against the forces of evil. For this war is indeed a crusade! A holy war to save the freedom of the world. In truth I tell you: the Germans do not act like us, neither do they think like us, for they are not, like us, children of God. Are those who shell cities populated only by civilians the children of God? Are those who advanced armed hiding behind women and children the children of God? With God's help, you must kill the Germans, good or bad, young or old. Kill every one of them so that it won't have to be done again. The Lord be with you". These words were reportedly based on a real sermon by an Anglican bishop in Westminster Abbey, and the scene apparently leaves out excerpts that were even worse. While this strikes me, in-part due to it being another example of influential Christians violating the values of Christ, the middle part where he questions whether certain people are even the children of God especially gets to me. While I have not fallen into the trap of forgetting that whole groups of people are God's children, I have sometimes felt tempted to forget that certain individuals are still fellow children of God, even when they do horrendous things. Back when I was a kid, I remember my mom telling me that we are even supposed to love Saddam Hussein. So I find that scene particularly effective as a cautionary tale of what not to be like.

Overall, "Joyeux Noël" is an echo of the very meaning behind Christmas, which ultimately gives the holiday its power: Amidst the worst of fallen mankind's brokenness, our Creator himself was willing to take flesh and enter into our dysfunction behind enemy lines as a meek baby, intending to both teach us and offer himself as a gift to save the world from sin and death, purely out of unearned love. When people are asked to define what the meaning of Christmas is, answers typically begin with a reference to it being a day of peace, generosity, hope, and goodwill towards all men. These are all important qualities which emanate from the spirit of Christmas. That being said, what are all of these things rooted in and what makes Christmas unique from other holidays which express these ideals? At the very least, it is the belief that mankind is dignified and beloved enough for God to make such a gift of himself, which fuels it. It is the beginning of the story which climaxes in Easter, showing that all the death, violence, scapegoating, poverty, selfishness, prejudice, tyranny, idolatry, hatred, and apathy in the world do not have the final say. While I do not think every Christmas movie needs to spell out Christ's part in Christmas to be a masterpiece and fulfill its purpose (one example being Chuck Jones' adaptation of "How the Grinch Stole Christmas!" ), one should still keep that part in mind. If those sentiments associated with Christmas were completely detached from the belief in Christ's birth, mission, and identity as Man's savior, would they have relayed the kind of power strongly enough to bring people to their senses, even amidst the atrocity that was WWI? The very atrocity which "All Quiet on the Western Front" puts on full gruesome display? Arguably, that truce which halted the Great War itself could be seen as another ripple effect of God's grace entering into our worst dysfunctions.

To end this post, I will link YouTube videos and a blog post showing a couple trailers and detailing three of the key scenes my analysis referenced from "All Quiet on the Western Front", "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers", and "Joyeux Noël"...

1.) Trailer for 2022's Adaptation of "All Quiet on the Western Front":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf8EYbVxtCY

2.) Paul Bäumer Stabs French Soldier in 2022 Adaptation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BukhPgF7su0

3.) French Soldier Scene Continues:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6d0WUM6dwU

4.) Faramir Killing the Haradrim Soldier, Then Reciting Tolkien's Words in Peter Jackson's Extended Edition of The Two Towers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVpCeQqluf8

5.) Trailer for "Joyeux Noël":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRrr-CDXijs

6.) A Blog Post By Padre Steve About the Bishop Scene in "Joyeux Noël":
https://padresteve.com/2015/12/25/joyeux-noel-i-belong-here-with-those-in-pain-who-have-lost-their-faith/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
New Intros for Interviews. Feedback Please.

Over the past couple of years, we’ve been releasing 10 clips a week, along with a long-form interview. Well now we’re making a shift that we believe will be more impactful. Moving forward, we’ll be experimenting with just five clips a week, but making those 5 (hopefully) exceptional. Additionally, we’re putting more focus on the introductions to our interviews. Here’s the intro for my upcoming interview with John Henry Spann, which will be available on Locals this week and on YouTube next week.

00:01:28
Principles for Theistic Decision-Making - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Principles for Theistic Decision-Making - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

In this installment of spiritual direction, we'll consider how to make good decisions. A lot of us have it in our minds that 1) God has a perfect plan, that 2) we're responsible for figuring it out, and that 3) if we don't, we total failures. I want to refine our understanding of these choices, so that we can be about the business of living our lives well : )

00:20:08
Our response to the death of Pope Francis
00:01:29
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

Quick update, baby Shepherd is out of the NICU and his older brother Walker is in love. Thank you all for your prayers. We will be going home tomorrow. God is good.

post photo preview

So I got a Pope on my birthday today. And to make it even more special, my sweet wife has been working on an icon for me: The Presentation of Christ in the Temple—Hypapante.

The pictures don’t do it justice. It’s solid, hardy, and masculine, with deep-stained wooden sides. She’s so talented.

In the icon, St. Joseph carries the two doves offered in the Temple. They represent more than ritual—they symbolize the offering of his whole life in service to Jesus and Mary.

I love the vibrant color pattern—especially the turquoise, one of my favorites—and how she included several of St. Joseph’s titles. “Protector of the Church” especially stands out.

I’ll always remember this icon—and Pope Leo XIV, who was elected the same day it was completed.

Through St. Joseph’s intercession, I’m praying for the grace to lead my domestic church—and for the new Pope as he shepherds the universal Church.

post photo preview
12 hours ago

Lots of opinions all of the sudden. I did not know who Cardinal Prevost was yesterday. I won't presume to know who Pope Leo XIV is today. I think I'm going to unplug. Let's all just pray for the man, the Church, and each other. We follow Christ, and he promised us a Church that would prevail. That promise has never been broken. We have the Sacraments. We have the Eucharist. What more do we want this side of heaven?

post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
3 Medium Sized Announcements!

Hey friends,

If you’re new here—welcome. Really. I know it sounds cliché, but I mean it: I couldn’t do any of this without your support, and I’m deeply grateful for it.

Alright, here’s a quick update on what’s coming up:

Starting June 1st, my family and I will be heading to Austria for two and a half months. While we’re there, I’ll be working on three major projects that I’m really excited about:

1. A Pints With Aquinas App

I could go on and on about this, but I’ll restrain myself—for now. Just know it’s coming, and it’s going to be awesome. As a Locals supporter, you’ll get access to everything inside the app (and yes, it’ll include even more than what’s currently on Locals). We want to release it at the beginning of 2026.

2. A Book: Jesus Our Refuge

This is a book I’ve felt called to write for years, and a recent conversation with John Eldredge finally pushed me over the edge. Here’s the part I’m most excited about: this book won’t earn me a cent.
Instead, I’ll be hosting events—both in the U.S. and internationally—where every single person who attends will receive a copy for free. It’s a message I want in as many hands as possible.

Here's a rough concept for the front cover:

a rough draft of the book cover

3. A New Book of Socratic Dialogues

A publisher (I’ll keep the name quiet for now) has invited me to write a book of Socratic dialogues making the case that Christianity is true. If you’ve enjoyed the dialogues I have published from time to time here and on Substack, you'll love this.

Now, if you’re anything like me, lying in a chair doing nothing sounds nice—for about 10 minutes. I need structure and rhythm. So while in Austria, I’ll be spending my mornings writing and working with those who will help develop the app.

That’s the plan. Thanks again for being here.

More soon,
Matt

Read full Article
post photo preview
Candor and Charity: Reflecting on a Papacy

In a recent article by Archbishop Charles Chaput in First Things, he reflects on the legacy of Pope Francis in this moment between pontificates. He was both charitable and candid—two things we desperately need right now.

I have personal memories of Pope Francis that I greatly value: a friendly and generous working relationship at the 1997 Synod on America when we were both newly appointed archbishops; his personal welcome and warmth at Rome’s 2014 Humanum conference; and the extraordinary success of his 2015 visit to Philadelphia for the Eighth World Meeting of Families. He devoted himself to serving the Church and her people in ways that he felt the times demanded. As a brother in the faith, and a successor of Peter, he deserves our ongoing prayers for his eternal life in the presence of the God he loved.

There’s a real tenderness and respect here. And it’s a good example of how disagreement with a pontificate shouldn’t involve hostility toward the pope. Sadly—though not surprisingly—I’ve seen more than a little of that in comment sections online.

He continues:

Having said that, an interregnum between papacies is a time for candor. The lack of it, given today’s challenges, is too expensive. In many ways, whatever its strengths, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church. He had no direct involvement in the Second Vatican Council and seemed to resent the legacy of his immediate predecessors who did; men who worked and suffered to incarnate the council’s teachings faithfully into Catholic life. His personality tended toward the temperamental and autocratic. He resisted even loyal criticism. He had a pattern of ambiguity and loose words that sowed confusion and conflict.

In the face of deep cultural fractures on matters of sexual behavior and identity, he condemned gender ideology but seemed to downplay a compelling Christian “theology of the body.” He was impatient with canon law and proper procedure. His signature project, synodality, was heavy on process and deficient in clarity. Despite an inspiring outreach to society’s margins, his papacy lacked a confident, dynamic evangelical zeal. The intellectual excellence to sustain a salvific (and not merely ethical) Christian witness in a skeptical modern world was likewise absent.

What the Church needs going forward is a leader who can marry personal simplicity with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ, a leader who has a heart of courage and a keen intellect to match it. Anything less won’t work.

I love that. “A leader with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ.” Amen!

May the Holy Spirit lead the cardinals in choosing our next pope. And may Pope Francis rest in the peace

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals