Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #25: “All Quiet on the Western Front”, “Joyeux Noël”, and God’s Entry Into Man’s Fallenness on Christmas Day

In the wake of our latest Christmas right before New Year’s Day, I wanted to do at least one post that was more overtly Christmas themed. While perusing my mental catalog of Christmas classics, I recalled 2005’s French historical war drama, “Joyeux Noël”. That film has particularly resonated with me, having also read the famous anti-war novel, “All Quiet on the Western Front” by Erich Maria Remarque.

For starters, I read “All Quiet on the Western Front” back when I was in High School, and I still remember some of the specific points I explored in my English essay. Up until that point, most of my knowledge and passion to learn has been centered around WWII, with me not learning nearly as much about the preceding “Great War”, until my Social Studies classes around the same time. Those Social Studies classes and my reading of Remarque’s novel helped me to see how WWI became reputed as a much more morally grey conflict than WWII, where armies of soldiers were often needlessly thrown into the squalid meat grinders of trench warfare, only for neither side to even gain any ground. There have also been a few movie adaptations of the novel, the latest of which is the 2022 German film that I recently watched on Netflix.

The narrative of "All Quiet on the Western Front" centers around a fictional soldier named Paul Bäumer, who gets swept up into volunteering for the Imperial German Army with his friends by pseudo-patriotic rhetoric, only to be traumatized and disillusioned by the hellish reality of war. The book showcases in full gritty detail all the horrors of war, which defy the promises of glory and honor Paul's comrades were sold. Death is random and dispassionate, taking the lives of anyone at any time, no matter how strong, courageous, or righteous one is perceived to be. Flooding, disease, muck, rats, and gore abound. Reading the descriptions of this has helped me to even more easily imagine how J.R.R. Tolkien was inspired to write the Dead Marshes scene in "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers", after witnessing such imagery himself as a British WWI soldier. One major theme highlighted in Remarque's novel is the perniciousness of blind nationalism, which goes beyond being proud and patriotic for one's country, to the degree that one's national identity and leaders are warped into an idol to worship. That is, at the expense of valuing human life, family, God, the truths about other peoples, and one's moral integrity. Even in the rare instances when Paul Bäumer gets a reprieve, being allowed to visit and rest in civilian settlements, shell shock and the loss of many friends leave him unable to interact well with the oblivious civilians. One of the few things to grant him fleeting comfort is the camaraderie and friendships he forms with some fellow soldiers.

One of the most famous and pivotal scenes from the book is the moment when Paul Bäumer is fighting French forces and mortally wounds an enemy soldier in hand-to-hand combat for the first time. Until this point in the story, Bäumer has never had to look squarely into the face of an enemy soldier and watch him slowly die before his eyes. When the Frenchman does not immediately die, but is nonetheless too weak to pose a threat, Paul is overcome with guilt and compassion, trying in vain to bandage his wounds and give him water. When the man dies, Paul examines the man's identification to learn that his name is Gérard Duval and he was once a printer by trade with a family. The experience is made worse as he is forced to hide inside the foxhole with Gérard's corpse for a period of time, lest he is picked off. This scene is one of the major catalysts to him realizing the evil and emptiness of the war propaganda he's been fed, which would dehumanize the enemy and promote pride in slaying and dying for one's government. He even bargains with the thought of eventually tracking down the man's family to pay them recompense. To reference another scene from Tolkien's The Two Towers, a similar sentiment is shared through the pondering of Samwise Gamgee, when he and Frodo witness a skirmish between Gondorian rangers and the Haradrim (Southron men who have allied with the Dark Lord Sauron and ride atop the mûmakil, a.k.a. oliphaunts). "It was Sam's first view of a battle of Men against Men, and he did not like it much". After seeing one Haradrim soldier get shot and fall down next to him, "He was glad that he could not see the dead face. He wondered what the man's name was and where he came from; and if he was really evil of heart, or what lies or threats had led him on the long march from his home; and if he would not really rather have stayed there in peace". This dialogue is incorporated into a scene reserved for the Extended Edition of Peter Jackson's film adaptation, which I will also link.

The book ends on a tragic note, where Paul Bäumer dies near the very end of the war, followed by the scene which gives the book its name. By the final chapters, Paul has lost even more comrades and it becomes clear that Germany's defeat is inevitable, for they can only delay the armistice at most. Despite the leaders above learning that the armistice is coming, soldiers on both sides are still ordered to stand guard and shoot to kill. And on one otherwise perfectly peaceful day, Paul is fatally shot, displaying a calm expression on his face "as though almost glad the end had come". With Bäumer being the only casualty, his death is considered so statistically insignificant that the frontline report simply states "All quiet on the Western Front". In 2022's German film adaptation, there is an added subplot where the general leading Paul's unit spitefully orders them to make one final charge on Armistice Day, sacrificing more lives in hopes that the war will end on one last German victory to vainly boast about.

With "All Quiet on the Western Front" still in my mind, it amplified the uplifting sense I felt years later, when I watched the French film "Joyeux Noël" ("Merry Christmas" ), based on the Christmas truce of December 1914. The film begins by first establishing the three countries, multiple characters from which will give their perspectives. In that introductory scene, schoolboys from France, England, then Germany each recite a jingoistic and/or xenophobic war poem, artistically illustrating the mentalities prevalent in those times and the harm they can pose to youth. From the three countries shown comes the movie's cast, which includes French Lieutenant Audebert, Lieutenant Gordon of Britain's Royal Scots Fusiliers, Scottish priest Father Palmer (who also serves as a British stretcher-bearer), Jewish German Lieutenant Horstmayer, German opera tenor Nikolaus Sprink, and Danish opera soprano Anna Sørensen (who is engaged to Nikolaus). The movie's first act showcases a taste of the same horrors outlined in "All Quiet on the Western Front", with one subplot following two Scottish brothers, one of whom gets killed in a battle between the British/French and the Germans. As the plot unfolds, soldiers on all sides lament that the war's continuation will deny them any possibility of seeing their families back at home, while Christmas Eve arrives. Hoping to boost morale, Scots in the British army begin to sing and play festive songs, while Sprink and Sørensen perform for the German line, with both groups being within earshot of each other. With religion and music being a common language, this catalyzes a series of events in the film, where soldiers on all sides call for a ceasefire. Amidst this ceasefire and celebrations, the soldiers all have a chance to lay down their arms and enjoy a brief period of time to fraternize with their enemies. The film ends on a bittersweet note, when the inevitable reality sets in that their soldiers' superiors are not swayed and will order them to resume fighting in the following days. One of the more unsettling implications is a reminder that the German Lieutenant Horstmayer is also a Jew, who is relocated by angry superiors and may eventually return to a Germany where Hitler rises to power.

Towards the very end of the film, when the protagonists are facing pushback from their warmongering peers and superiors, I find this contrast between Father Palmer and the bishop above him to be particularly hard-hitting. Father Palmer is sent back to his own parish and the unit he served is shamefully disbanded. Palmer is then rebuked by his bishop, who rejects his sentiment of goodwill towards the truce and delivers a misguided hate-filled sermon: "Christ our Lord said, 'Think not that I come to bring peace on earth. I come not to bring peace, but a sword.' The Gospel according to St. Matthew. Well, my brethren, the sword of the Lord is in your hands. You are the very defenders of civilization itself. The forces of good against the forces of evil. For this war is indeed a crusade! A holy war to save the freedom of the world. In truth I tell you: the Germans do not act like us, neither do they think like us, for they are not, like us, children of God. Are those who shell cities populated only by civilians the children of God? Are those who advanced armed hiding behind women and children the children of God? With God's help, you must kill the Germans, good or bad, young or old. Kill every one of them so that it won't have to be done again. The Lord be with you". These words were reportedly based on a real sermon by an Anglican bishop in Westminster Abbey, and the scene apparently leaves out excerpts that were even worse. While this strikes me, in-part due to it being another example of influential Christians violating the values of Christ, the middle part where he questions whether certain people are even the children of God especially gets to me. While I have not fallen into the trap of forgetting that whole groups of people are God's children, I have sometimes felt tempted to forget that certain individuals are still fellow children of God, even when they do horrendous things. Back when I was a kid, I remember my mom telling me that we are even supposed to love Saddam Hussein. So I find that scene particularly effective as a cautionary tale of what not to be like.

Overall, "Joyeux Noël" is an echo of the very meaning behind Christmas, which ultimately gives the holiday its power: Amidst the worst of fallen mankind's brokenness, our Creator himself was willing to take flesh and enter into our dysfunction behind enemy lines as a meek baby, intending to both teach us and offer himself as a gift to save the world from sin and death, purely out of unearned love. When people are asked to define what the meaning of Christmas is, answers typically begin with a reference to it being a day of peace, generosity, hope, and goodwill towards all men. These are all important qualities which emanate from the spirit of Christmas. That being said, what are all of these things rooted in and what makes Christmas unique from other holidays which express these ideals? At the very least, it is the belief that mankind is dignified and beloved enough for God to make such a gift of himself, which fuels it. It is the beginning of the story which climaxes in Easter, showing that all the death, violence, scapegoating, poverty, selfishness, prejudice, tyranny, idolatry, hatred, and apathy in the world do not have the final say. While I do not think every Christmas movie needs to spell out Christ's part in Christmas to be a masterpiece and fulfill its purpose (one example being Chuck Jones' adaptation of "How the Grinch Stole Christmas!" ), one should still keep that part in mind. If those sentiments associated with Christmas were completely detached from the belief in Christ's birth, mission, and identity as Man's savior, would they have relayed the kind of power strongly enough to bring people to their senses, even amidst the atrocity that was WWI? The very atrocity which "All Quiet on the Western Front" puts on full gruesome display? Arguably, that truce which halted the Great War itself could be seen as another ripple effect of God's grace entering into our worst dysfunctions.

To end this post, I will link YouTube videos and a blog post showing a couple trailers and detailing three of the key scenes my analysis referenced from "All Quiet on the Western Front", "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers", and "Joyeux Noël"...

1.) Trailer for 2022's Adaptation of "All Quiet on the Western Front":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf8EYbVxtCY

2.) Paul Bäumer Stabs French Soldier in 2022 Adaptation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BukhPgF7su0

3.) French Soldier Scene Continues:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6d0WUM6dwU

4.) Faramir Killing the Haradrim Soldier, Then Reciting Tolkien's Words in Peter Jackson's Extended Edition of The Two Towers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVpCeQqluf8

5.) Trailer for "Joyeux Noël":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRrr-CDXijs

6.) A Blog Post By Padre Steve About the Bishop Scene in "Joyeux Noël":
https://padresteve.com/2015/12/25/joyeux-noel-i-belong-here-with-those-in-pain-who-have-lost-their-faith/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Our response to the death of Pope Francis
00:01:29
On the Lookout for Sins of Speech - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Hello! I'm writing a book at present on sins of speech for Emmaus Road. I've been thinking a lot about cultivating healthy habits of communication, so just thought I'd share a few thoughts. Prayers for you during this Holy Week!

00:20:01
The Practice of the Presence of God - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

There are various different prayer practices that people have used in the tradition as a way of remaining in the presence of God--the practice of the presence of God (or recollection) is just one. In this video, I explain a little how it helps us to connect the dots between earthly life and heavenly realities.

00:19:43
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent
Meme Monday

… okay. This isn’t a meme. Just my heart’s deepest longing. Also I’m aware that it’s Wednesday.

post photo preview
Daniel O’Connor

Apparently, Daniel has recorded a video about me canceling him from my show. I haven’t watched it, nor will I, But I was shown a screenshot of an edited message from me to him which I think makes my communication with him seem harsher than it was. Here is his version, mine is beneath. I wish Daniel well.

April 24, 2025

I have resigned from my job. I would appreciate some prayers as I start a new phase in my life. I'll be looking for my next programming gig shortly. Thanks.

post photo preview
Candor and Charity: Reflecting on a Papacy

In a recent article by Archbishop Charles Chaput in First Things, he reflects on the legacy of Pope Francis in this moment between pontificates. He was both charitable and candid—two things we desperately need right now.

I have personal memories of Pope Francis that I greatly value: a friendly and generous working relationship at the 1997 Synod on America when we were both newly appointed archbishops; his personal welcome and warmth at Rome’s 2014 Humanum conference; and the extraordinary success of his 2015 visit to Philadelphia for the Eighth World Meeting of Families. He devoted himself to serving the Church and her people in ways that he felt the times demanded. As a brother in the faith, and a successor of Peter, he deserves our ongoing prayers for his eternal life in the presence of the God he loved.

There’s a real tenderness and respect here. And it’s a good example of how disagreement with a pontificate shouldn’t involve hostility toward the pope. Sadly—though not surprisingly—I’ve seen more than a little of that in comment sections online.

He continues:

Having said that, an interregnum between papacies is a time for candor. The lack of it, given today’s challenges, is too expensive. In many ways, whatever its strengths, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church. He had no direct involvement in the Second Vatican Council and seemed to resent the legacy of his immediate predecessors who did; men who worked and suffered to incarnate the council’s teachings faithfully into Catholic life. His personality tended toward the temperamental and autocratic. He resisted even loyal criticism. He had a pattern of ambiguity and loose words that sowed confusion and conflict.

In the face of deep cultural fractures on matters of sexual behavior and identity, he condemned gender ideology but seemed to downplay a compelling Christian “theology of the body.” He was impatient with canon law and proper procedure. His signature project, synodality, was heavy on process and deficient in clarity. Despite an inspiring outreach to society’s margins, his papacy lacked a confident, dynamic evangelical zeal. The intellectual excellence to sustain a salvific (and not merely ethical) Christian witness in a skeptical modern world was likewise absent.

What the Church needs going forward is a leader who can marry personal simplicity with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ, a leader who has a heart of courage and a keen intellect to match it. Anything less won’t work.

I love that. “A leader with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ.” Amen!

May the Holy Spirit lead the cardinals in choosing our next pope. And may Pope Francis rest in the peace

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Pope is Dead

I got a text from my sister this morning: “The pope died.” I stood there for a moment just staring at the words. I then went to the internet, thinking maybe it was a rumor or a mistake.

But it wasn’t.

Pope Francis died this morning at the age of 88. He passed away in the Casa Santa Marta, the residence inside the Vatican where he had lived since his election in 2013. He had been suffering from a number of health issues in recent years, including a recent case of pneumonia.

His death marks the end of a 12-year papacy, and now the Church enters the period known as sede vacante—the seat of Peter is vacant. Cardinals from around the world will soon gather in Rome for a conclave to elect the next pope. No one knows who it will be, but we should be praying: that the Holy Spirit guide their decision, and that the next pope be a faithful shepherd for the Church in these difficult times.

Pray this prayer with me for the soul of Pope Francis:

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon him. May his souls and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

Read full Article
post photo preview
7 Terrible Arguments For Atheism

I’ve heard plenty of arguments for atheism over the years—some thoughtful, some clever, and some… well, let’s just say I used to rattle off the worst of them back when I was an angsty 17-year-old agnostic.

Today I want to look at 7 terrible arguments for atheism—the kind that sound good at first but fall apart when you give them more than five seconds of thought.

1. "Who created God?"

This question misunderstands what Christians (and classical theists) mean by “God.” God, by definition, is uncaused—the necessary, self-existent being who causes everything else. Asking “Who created God?” is like asking “What’s north of the North Pole?” or “If your brother is a bachelor, what’s his wife’s name?” It’s a category mistake. The question only makes sense if God were a contingent being—just one more thing in the universe that needed a cause. But He isn’t. He’s the reason anything exists at all.

2. "I just believe in one less god than you."

This is clever-sounding but logically shallow. The difference between atheism and theism isn’t about the number of gods one believes in—it’s about the kind of being we’re talking about. Christians reject all finite, tribal, man-made gods too. The Christian claim is not that God is just one more being among many, but that God is Being Itself—the necessary, uncaused source of all reality. Saying, “I just believe in one less god than you,” is like saying, “I contend we’re both bachelors—I just have one less wife.” The difference between one and none isn’t minor—it’s everything. Atheism isn’t a slight variation on theism; it’s a rejection of the entire foundation of existence.

3. "Science has disproven God."

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals