Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #22: One Scene Included in Rankin/Bass’ “The Return of the King” That I Would Have Also Liked in Jackson’s Version

For this week, I am going to finally focus on an adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s work. It is a long time coming, seeing how Tolkien is both an acclaimed Catholic thinker and a major contributor to pop-culture, through his Middle-earth stories that pioneered new standards for modern fantasy. And today, I am going to focus on one scene he wrote and how a more obscure adaptation brought it to life.

Decades before Peter Jackson’s live-action Lord of the Rings trilogy, Tolkien’s Middle-earth stories were first adapted to film thrice in animated form, by the Rankin/Bass production company and Ralph Bakshi. It began with Rankin/Bass’ adaptation of “The Hobbit” in 1977, followed by Ralph Bakshi’s 1978 film adapting “The Fellowship of the Ring” and parts of “The Two Towers”, and then Rankin/Bass’ 1980 adaptation of “The Return of the King”. To first sum up the common consensus of Bakshi’s film, it is an imperfect but still respectable first attempt at adapting TLotR, which reportedly inspired Peter Jackson to make the live-action trilogy. I will even include a link to side-by-side comparisons. As for Rankin/Bass’ “The Hobbit”, I feel similarly and perceive it to have many opposite strengths and weaknesses compared to Peter Jackson’s Hobbit trilogy. For example, the Rankin/Bass version drastically trims down or entirely cuts out a few iconic scenes, characters, and subplots from the The Hobbit book. Meanwhile, the Jackson trilogy has so much content that many felt it got bloated at times, with the third movie in particular having arguably a lot of filler. Besides that, one’s mileage will vary between whether they prefer a more straight adaptation of the Hobbit book, or a LotR prequel trilogy which draws its main source material from the events of “The Hobbit”. If one prefers the former, then I think the Rankin/Bass version better captures that feel, with its more whimsical tone, art style evoking a children’s storybook, and use of musical numbers mostly pulled straight from the book.

Regarding the Rankin/Bass duology, “The Return of the King” was a significantly more flawed end product than “The Hobbit”, in my opinion. The Rankin/Bass movies go straight from “The Hobbit” to “The Return of the King”, skipping over “The Fellowship of the Ring” and “The Two Towers” entirely. Therefore, the viewer is starting on the final chapter, without having the Rankin/Bass versions of the Fellowship characters set up first. Ralph Bakshi’s LotR was made right before this, but that is unrelated to the Rankin/Bass films and there are still some events of “The Two Towers”, which Bakshi did not get to and Rankin/Bass skips over. Besides that, the Rankin/Bass film only has a 98-minute runtime to adapt the whole third book. And even with its short runtime, I feel the film does not make good use of its exposition and choice of scenes to deliver a fleshed-out and well-paced narrative. When I once watched it at my uncle’s house, I remember my mom stating that she would have had trouble following it, if she had not seen the Jackson trilogy. Also, while Jackson‘s RotK arguably makes more changes from Tolkien’s book, for better or worse, the Rankin/Bass version botches a few major parts. For example, I recall Aragorn only marching on the Black Gate after Frodo and Sam have already reached Mount Doom, robbing the former of its story purpose and dramatic weight. Not to mention that everyone has mocked how the Witch-king of Angmar's otherwise intimidating presence is ruined by his voice sounding cheesily like Skeletor, Starscream, or Cobra Commander. That is jarring compared to how Rankin/Bass’ previous Hobbit film makes great use of Richard Boone’s voice for Smaug the dragon. I once even did my own fan-edit trying to make the Witch-king far more menacing by swapping his voice with that of the Horned King in Disney's "The Black Cauldron". There are some good parts, though, like the moody and atmospheric background art, the portrayals of certain other characters like Samwise Gamgee, a couple nice sentimental moments, various parts faithfully recreated from the book, and certain scenes entertainingly growing on me like the orcs’ “Where There’s a Whip, There’s a Way” musical number. Yet, there is one more positive aspect I want to focus on in this post.

Despite its faults, Rankin/Bass’ “The Return of the King” does have one unique part I really gravitated towards, its portrayal of the book’s scene where Samwise Gamgee is tempted by the One Ring. It takes place after the unconscious Frodo Baggins is found by orcs in the mountain pass of Cirith Ungol and taken to their tower. Meanwhile, his loyal companion Samwise follows behind and plans to rescue him. However, Sam is stalled by temptation, for he has taken the One Ring from Frodo’s person, having initially feared that Frodo was dead. In his brief time experiencing the burden of ring-bearer, the cursed ring attempts to brainwash him.

I have my copy of “The Return of the King” book with me, and here is how Tolkien describes the following scene. “Already the ring tempted him, gnawing at his will and reason. Wild fantasies arose in his mind; and he saw Samwise the Strong, Hero of the Age, striding with a flaming sword across the darkened land, and armies flocking to his call as he marched to the overthrow of Barad-dûr. And then all the clouds rolled away, and the white sun shone, and at his command the vale of Gorgoroth became a garden of flowers and trees and brought forth fruit. He had only to put on the Ring and claim it for his own, and all this could be. In that hour of trial it was the love of his master that helped most to hold him firm; but also deep down in him lived still unconquered his plain hobbit-sense: he knew in the core of his heart that he was not large enough to bear such a burden, even if such visions were not a mere cheat to betray him. The one small garden of a free gardener was all his need and due, not a garden swollen to a realm; his own hands to use, not the hands of others to command.”

The Rankin/Bass film not only portrays this part faithfully, but also makes for an entertaining spectacle and adds its own complementary details, yielding an unexpected gem of a scene in my opinion. Besides incorporating all of the book’s details, regarding both Sam’s vision and the afterwards reveal of how he overcame the temptation, I think it does a good job with the animation and especially the score. The music achieves this perfect balance between sounding majestic and triumphant on the surface, suiting Sam’s fantasy, while also having this sense of madness and danger growing underneath until it erupts and crescendos. Right after Sam beholds “The gardens of my delight!”, he then declares in a megalomaniacal tone, “So shall I transform the world!”. The dream sequence closes on a newly added detail, where he forcibly transforms all the orcs into various animals for them to populate his new gardens. “All could be mine… if I but claim thee, Ring!”.

Whether such thought was put into it or not, I say the Rankin/Bass scene’s added details tie it even more closely into Tolkien’s themes and lore, regarding the Dark Lord Sauron’s former master, Morgoth. I have still not yet read my copy of Tolkien’s “The Silmarillion”. But I have heard that Middle-earth’s backstory involves Melkor, one of the angelic Valar who rebels against Eru (God), tries to sing by his own disharmonious tune, and renames himself to Morgoth. Sauron is originally one of Morgoth’s servants before becoming the last dark lord in Middle-earth. A common theme in Tolkien’s work is how Morgoth could not create his own evil beings from nothing, but merely take already-existing creatures made by Eru and corrupt them into twisted mockeries, like the orcs being a parody of the elves. This is often cited as an example of Tolkien inserting his Catholic worldview, that evil can only exist as a privation, distortion, hollow counterfeit, or misuse of the good things God has made. Whether intentional or not, it seems the Rankin/Bass portrayal of Sam is not only being tempted with glory, victory, and a majestic garden like his book counterpart, but also the opportunity to emulate Morgoth... or the temptation promised by the devil to Adam and Eve. In the dream, he vows to transform the world to his liking and further twists the orcs into creatures they were never meant to be. As many YouTube commenters have pointed out, this clashes with a moment during the “Leave Tomorrow Till It Comes” music number, where Rankin/Bass’ portrayal of Frodo fantasizes about a world where even the orcs are redeemed and on friendly terms with them.

Also, the way some people have reacted to that imagery of a corrupted Samwise Gamgee reminds me of Tolkien’s thought experiment, where he answered what would happen if Gandalf had claimed the One Ring and allowed it to corrupt him. “Gandalf as Ring-Lord would have been far worse than Sauron. He would have remained ‘righteous’, but self-righteous. He would have continued to rule and order things for ‘good’, and the benefit of his subjects according to his wisdom (which was and would have remained great). [In the margin] Thus while Sauron multiplied [illegible word] evil, he left ‘good’ clearly distinguishable from it. Gandalf would have made good detestable and seem evil”. Reading what Tolkien reportedly wrote about the subject reminds me of one arguable reason why Jesus in the Gospels was often the harshest towards individuals among the Jewish high priests. Other sinners’ actions at least would not muddle the difference between virtue and vice so much or twist what it means to be a righteous and Godly man. Also, I remember people like my mom and various religious speakers saying that, if the devil cannot tempt you to deliberately embrace evil, then he will try to take one of your noble qualities or good intentions, then misdirect them towards a detrimental end.

In Jackson’s version of “The Return of the King”, the closest we get to that is the scene where Sam hesitates to give Frodo back the Ring, and I would have liked to have seen more of that recreated, even if it is not necessarily as grandiose. For example, as the sound of Elijah Wood’s Frodo requesting the Ring becomes muffled and foreboding music plays, Sean Astin’s Sam could be shown hearing chants for “Samwise the Strong” in his head. Then, there could be brief flashes of imagery, like the visions Frodo has when he looks into Galadriel’s Mirror. They first show an orc-infested Mordor, then the armies of orcs all painfully turning to wood, as Sam raises a flaming sword before them. Next, roots, branches, and flowers sprout from the wooden orcs, and the dark clouds are dispersed by a surreally colorful aura. Mordor now looks like an enchanted meadow with Sam in the middle of it all, wearing the One Ring. But the coloring and wildlife look subtly unnatural and off-putting, like a scene out of 2018’s sci-fi cosmic horror film, “Annihilation”. We finally see Sam’s face looking around in the vision and realizing something is wrong, right before the real Sam moves the Ring towards Frodo, who snatches it away. As the two later walk into Mordor, Sam could mention that the Ring tempted him with a garden, but it would have been too big for him to tend with his own hands anyway.

I wanted to share my thoughts on this one part of the Rankin/Bass film, which I felt warranted a great deal of appreciation, even amidst the rest of the movie’s flaws. And now here are some supplementary links to the clips and quotations…

1.) Rankin/Bass' Samwise the Strong Scene:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PE-5ETUtW4

2.) Rankin/Bass' "Leave Tomorrow Till It Comes" Scene:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_274z9AO6Q8

3.) Quote in Tolkien's Letters About a Ring-Corrupted Gandalf Cited By Humphrey Carpenter:
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9762789-gandalf-as-ring-lord-would-have-been-far-worse-than-sauron

4.) Peter Jackson's Closest Equivalent to Sam's Temptation Scene:
https://youtu.be/qQZKLIexcVk?t=128

5.) "The Lord of the Rings Side-by-Side: Ralph Bakshi ('78)/Peter Jackson ('01-'03)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t7KSarpfFM

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The Practice of the Presence of God - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

There are various different prayer practices that people have used in the tradition as a way of remaining in the presence of God--the practice of the presence of God (or recollection) is just one. In this video, I explain a little how it helps us to connect the dots between earthly life and heavenly realities.

00:19:43
Life on the Struggle Bus - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

These past two months have been a bit brutal : ) Sleep, in which I typically indulge sparingly (not by choice), has been practically impossible. At a certain point, it's like: "What's going on?" This video narrates my attempt to make sense of a stressful time. . . . Where is the Lord in the midst of anxiety?

00:21:02
Jesus, Our Refuge
00:03:39
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent
Meme Monday!

Go! Go! Go!

post photo preview

Hello Community, I am asking for an urgent prayer request. My daughter was admitted to the Youth Crisis Recovery Center in my city last night after a session with her therapist uncovered some pretty severe "intrusive thoughts" of self-harm. We have not even reached out to our families because of the sensitive nature of the situation and her desire for privacy. I figured this place was the most faith-filled and anonymous place I could go. Please pray for her, my husband and me, and the rest of our children as we navigate this scary place. I feel a distinct lack of faith in this place and I'm trying to figure out how to get her the help she needs knowing that they will probably not be relying on the healing graces of God.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Big Chesterton Cigars Event! (Fri 25 April - Sun 27 April)

Join us for an unforgettable weekend of cigars, conversation, music, and meaningful reflection at Chesterton’s Cigars, April 25–27 in Steubenville, OH. From live bands and inspiring lectures to a guided cigar tasting, this event will be a celebration of friendship, faith, and relaxation. I’ll be there, along with Dr. Scott Hahn and other special guests. Whether you come for the theology, the tobacco, or the camaraderie, there’ll be something for everyone. Come raise a glass—and a cigar—with us.

 

Friday, April 25th, 2025

 
6:00 PM – Evening Opening Prayer
Fr. Damian Ference will begin the evening with an opening prayer.
6:15 PM – Kickoff Speech by John Walker
John Walker will officially open the event with a speech, reflecting on the spirit of Chesterton’s and the significance of this cigar launch.
6:45 PM - 8:00 PM – Mingling & Cigars
Enjoy an evening of conversation, cigars, and great company as we kick off the weekend.
8:00 PM - 10:00 PM – Jazz Night
A performance by Chesterton’s “House” Jazz Band that performs here on a weekly basis for our popular Jazz Nights. Comprised of all local musicians
10:00 PM - 11:00 PM – Live Music by Emma & David Kruise
A live performance from Emma and David Kruise
11:00 PM - 1:00 AM – open mic/mingling until close
 

Saturday, April 26th, 2025

 
8:00 AM – Mass at St. Peter’s
425 N 4th St, Steubenville, OH
9:00 AM – Breakfast, Coffee & Cigars
Featuring the Chesterton Cigar and Coffee from Leonardo’s Coffee House in Steubenville
11:30 AM – Pipe Tobacco & Tin Fish Luncheon
Tins and tins! Enjoy conversation over a pipe and some tinned fish w/ accoutrements
12:30 PM - 3:00 PM - lectures and discussion
Lectures and readings from special guests of Chesterton’s including Joe Grabowski, VP of Evangelization and Mission at the Chesterton Society, John Walker
3:00 PM - 5:00 PM - break
5:00 PM - 7:00 PM – Dinner
Dine at one of Steubenville’s local favorites before the evening’s festivities.
7:00 PM – Evening Prayer and kick-off
7:15 PM - Special guest appearance
7:30 PM – Panel & Tasting Event
A slot dedicated to the story of Chesterton’s founding, the inspiration behind the Pints with Aquinas and Chesterton’s Cigar, and a guided cigar tasting.
 

Sunday, April 27th, 2025

 
10:00 AM – Mass at St. Peter’s
Close the weekend with Sunday Mass at St. Peter’s Catholic Church.
11:00 AM - 3:00 PM – Brunch & Farewell Gathering
A grand finale to the weekend—join us for raw oysters, Bloody Marys, and other delectable brunch offerings to wrap up the weekend.
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Queen and The Witch (A Fairy Tale)

I read fairy tales to my kids all the time, so I figured I’d try writing one myself. I’m a bit embarrassed to share it—I really want it to be good (or at least decent), but I’m not sure it is.

Here’s what I do know: if I don’t post it now, it’ll probably sit in my drafts until I forget it even exists. But if I share it publicly, I’ll have to own it—and that makes it way more likely I’ll keep editing until I’m happy with it, maybe even write more.

So if you’re up for it, I’d love your feedback. Critiques, suggestions, or just letting me know what you liked—it all helps. Thanks for reading.


In a certain kingdom, in a certain land, there lived a boy named Peter. Though the world called him a prince, he cared more for mud puddles and beetles than for gold or grandeur. Each day, he wandered the royal gardens, collecting feathers, following ant trails, and speaking with birds in a language that only he and they knew.

One morning, his mother—the Queen—kissed his brow and knelt to look him in the eyes. She wore her cloak of sapphire and silver, and her voice was steady but kind. “I must go away for three days, my love,” she said. “There are matters in the outer provinces that need my attention. While I’m gone, stay within the garden walls. Speak only with the wind, the birds, and those who belong here. Everything you need is here at home. And above all, do not wander into the dark wood.”

Then she rose, mounted her horse, and rode out through the castle gates, her cloak trailing like a ribbon of blue light.

That first morning, after the Queen had left, Peter found himself near the edge of the royal gardens. The trees of the dark woods stood just beyond the wall, tall and still, their trunks fading into shadow.

He knew he shouldn’t. He could almost hear his mother’s voice: Stay within the garden walls, my love... But the air felt different—cooler, quieter. And then, on the breeze, he heard it: a female voice, low and lilting, like a lullaby she was singing to herself, not meant for anyone to hear.

“Give me your eyes, and I’ll show you the stars.
Give me your heart, and I’ll sing you to sleep.
Give me your name, and you’ll never be hungry again.”

Peter stopped. The voice was soft, but close.

“Who’s there?” he whispered. No one answered. Only the leaves stirred.

His feet moved before he realized—one step, then another, as if the trees were pulling him forward. The garden wall faded behind him. The light dimmed. Shadows thickened. And then, between two trunks, he saw her. Cloaked in sapphire and silver, her face just visible in the dappled gloom. It was her—it had to be. His mother.

“Mother?” he called, relief blooming in his chest. He ran toward her.

She turned and smiled. Her voice was soft and sweet, but it clung to him, sticky and strange.

“Dearest,” she said, bending low, “give me your eyes, and I’ll show you the stars. The world is so dark, and you deserve to see its wonders as I do.”

For a moment, Peter wanted to believe her. But something in her face didn’t sit right, like a song played with one wrong note. Her shadow stretched the wrong way, and her breath smelled of rust.

He froze. The warmth draining from his body.

“You are not my Mother,” he said slowly. “And my Father is the King”

Her face began to blur, like the surface of a pond just after something moved through it. The blue of her cloak faded to dull gray, and her eyes lost their shine, darkening to something flat and cold. Then, without a word, she turned and slipped away into the wind, as if she had never been there at all.

The next morning, Peter sat beneath the old maple tree at the center of the garden, staring at the grass, twisting a fallen leaf between his fingers. “Did I dream it?” he asked aloud. “Did I imagine the woods? The Woman? The song?” The garden made no reply. Maybe he had fallen asleep by the wall. Maybe it had all been a strange sort of dream. He was just starting to believe that—when he heard it again. The same strange tune, drifting from the trees.

“Give me your eyes, and I’ll show you the stars.
Give me your heart, and I’ll sing you to sleep.
Give me your name, and you’ll never be hungry again.”

Before he realized it, Peter had stepped beyond the garden wall, drawn deep into the dark wood—as though his feet belonged to someone else, as though another will entirely guided his steps—until he found himself standing beneath the crooked elm, where she waited. Her silver robe hung limp and wet, her hair tangled with leaf and moss. Her hands were folded, and her voice, when she spoke, was barely more than a breath.

“Poor boy,” she murmured, not looking at him. “Give me your heart, and I’ll sing you to sleep.”

Peter felt drowsiness wash over him, tempting him to surrender—but then he shook himself awake, eyes clearing.

“You are not my mother,” he said firmly, “and my Father is the King.”

The witch's gentle expression twisted into a disappointed frown, and without another word, she faded into the shadows, leaving only silence behind.

On the third day, the witch returned, her enchanting song luring Peter back into the dark forest.

“Give me your eyes, and I’ll show you the stars.
Give me your heart, and I’ll sing you to sleep.
Give me your name, and you’ll never be hungry again.”

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
What the Heck Is Antisemitism, Anyway?
(A Socratic Dialogue)

I recently posted this quotation from Pope Paul VI to Youtube:

“Furthermore, in her rejection of every persecution against any man, the Church, mindful of the patrimony she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel's spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone.”

And, oh man, was the feedback fun. Within minutes, I was accused of everything from cozying up to The Daily Wire to desperately chasing subscribers to—and maybe I shouldn’t be surprised—being under the influence of Jewish money.

But one question kept coming up: What is antisemitism? One commenter put it this way:

“How about having a clear definition of what the word means? Is that too much to ask? Because quite frankly, every time I look it up, it's never really clear. Words have meaning. Or at least they should. If the M word for taking a life was used, and someone is accused of it, everyone knows what it means. But imagine it's not clear what it means. And someone out of nowhere accused someone of it, but the definition keeps changing or is not clear—what then?”

Fair enough. So, to help clarify, I’ve written a Socratic dialogue exploring what I antisemitism is—and what it isn’t.

One quick note before you read on—I assure you, I’m writing this in good faith. I know this topic is deeply important to many people, including my fellow Catholics. This article is simply my attempt to articulate what seems obvious to me, not a middle finger at those who disagree.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals