Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #16: The Ascension of Lula’s Love from Storge to Agape in Genndy Tartakovsky’s “Primal”

For my second-to-last Halloween-themed post, I have decided to delve into arguably one of the most heartfelt episodes from Genndy Tartakovsky’s animated show on Adult Swim, “Primal”. That episode focuses on a character working for the show’s villain of the week, who helps capture the protagonists. But said character named Lula soon grows to empathize with them, due to her discovering their backstory and relating it to her own personal tragedy. This sets her on a path towards reformation and heroic self-sacrifice.

The main story in this anthology series centers around a neanderthal hunter and female tyrannosaur, Spear and Fang, who form a partnership after the deaths of their offspring. They survive together in this fantasy world of “One Million B.C.” meets “Conan the Barbarian”, and their episodic journey to find a new family eventually leads to them facing more advanced human civilizations. In keeping with Genndy’s love of visual storytelling, these episodes have provided a great deal of spectacle, thrills, and emotional drama with very little spoken dialogue.

Episodes 7-9 from “Primal” Season 1 each provide a self-contained adventure fit for spooky season, but the most meaningful and emotionally impactful one is Episode 8: “Coven of the Damned”. When the episode begins, Spear and Fang are still roaming this primordial continent ruled by prehistoric animals, other fearsome beasts, savage ape-men, and the occasional supernatural threat. While laying low, they happen upon a race of witch-like people. The witches have just captured a fellow neanderthal, bound him to stone columns, drew magic runes on him, and lit a green fire in preparation for something.

Spear and Fang quietly watch in horror, as the coven’s matriarch arrives on a pterosaur mount, ready to perform a dark ritual on the bound neanderthal. The witches chant in celebration of their matriarch’s arrival. That is, except for one witch, whom the credits refer to as “Lula”. As Lula solemnly watches from the sidelines, seemingly ostracized by her group, their matriarch transforms into a demonic looking entity. In her eldritch form, the matriarch drains the captured neanderthal’s life force, leaving a husk behind.

After draining all the caveman’s life force in the form of green glowing energy, the transformed matriarch harnesses it… to create a small baby. Immediately, the witches are rejoicing and each clamber to be the one who will receive the baby. That is, except for Lula, who spectates with a depressed look. Although it is not clearly stated, it appears that the witches’ tribe and perhaps their whole species has been reduced to this small all-female population of haggard individuals, who cannot procreate naturally anymore. Hence, they seem to have turned to this dark sorcery as the only perceived means to keep their lineage going. Spear and Fang have seen enough.

Unfortunately, the matriarch’s mind-controlled pterosaur turns to spot Spear and Fang, sending the witches in hot pursuit. Spear and Fang flee for their lives, swiping at the levitating witches that ambush them and vanish. However, that one witch Lula manages to hold Fang’s attention and cast a spell to bring the tyrannosaur under her mind-control, like the matriarch’s pterosaur. Spear is shocked to find Fang now ridden by one of the witches and is quickly captured himself.

The next day, Spear finds himself tied to the same rock columns, with Fang now serving as Lula’s mind-controlled mount. Dismayed, Spear furiously shouts to get Fang’s attention, causing the dinosaur to briefly break free from Lula’s control and throw her off. Lula focuses her magic to regain control over Fang, but is intrigued. To find out what is so special about Spear and Fang’s connection, Lula conjures another spell, which allows her to enter both of their minds and watch their past events play out before her.

Lula uses her “backstory magic” to witness the events shown in the very first episode of “Primal”, when Spear and Fang’s shared loss of family becomes the start to their partnership. To recap, Episode 1 titled “Spear and Fang” begins with Spear returning from his hunt to witness his wife and children being attacked and devoured by a pack of horned reddish tyrannosaurs. Struggling to keep on living after the death of his family, Spear spots the silhouette of Fang. He mistakenly thinks she might be one of the horned tyrannosaurs, and follows her with vengeful intent. Spear is intrigued upon noticing that Fang is not only different from his family’s assailants, but also a mother herself. That moment of peace is interrupted when the horned tyrannosaurs also arrive, now with eyes on Fang’s hatchlings. Spear and Fang lash out at their common enemy together and successfully defeat them, but not before Fang’s babies are eaten too.

Lula is taken aback by the duo’s backstory, and the viewers sees why, when she then uses that magic to rewatch her own past. After eying a drawing of herself and a child, she rewatches the time her coven’s matriarch gave her a baby. Lula’s vision flashes forward to her past self and her still small child playing in a flowery meadow. Lula’s present self cries out in horror and grief, remembering when she dropped her guard for a single moment. Her child gets distracted by a butterfly and obliviously chases it off a cliff. Since then, Lula has been in mourning and scorned by her coven.

As Lula draws the marks on Spear for the upcoming night’s ritual, her empathy for Spear leads to her having second thoughts and eventually taking decisive action. She sees that same kind of butterfly fluttering around Spear, is reminded of the similar histories they share, and can no longer bring herself to watch Spear be sacrificed. When the matriarch descends once more to carry out the ritual, Lula takes Spear’s… spear and slays the matriarch’s pterosaur. Next, she sends the mind-controlled Fang to charge in, scatter the other witches, and smash the pillars, freeing Spear. However, the matriarch is enraged.

When the coven’s matriarch intervenes, Lula has no choice but to choose between her life or Spear’s. The matriarch skin-changes into a supersized wolf (my Halloween posts even include a werewolf now) and trades snaps with Fang, proving to be a dangerously even opponent for the tyrannosaur. Lula realizes that their combined strength will not be enough to hold back the coven, so Spear needs to get out of there now. Before Fang and the transformed matriarch begin a proper fight, Lula skin-changes into a giant raven to buy them time. She distracts the matriarch with her assault and commands the mind-controlled Fang to ride off with Spear, while they have that brief window.

Lula gives her life for Spear. The matriarch and Lula continue fighting in wolf and raven form, but the latter is critically wounded. As Lula turns back into her normal form and the matriarch’s jaws open to encircle her head, we cut back to Spear and Fang. Lula’s spell wears off on the running Fang, causing her and Spear to briefly tumble. But by now, the pair is far enough away from the coven. They wander off on their next adventure, with Spear still wondering what happened to Lula.

But Lula’s sacrifice does not go in rewarded, for the fate awaiting her yields a beautifully ironic contrast to the episode’s title, “Coven of the Damned”. We cut to Lula’s spirit wandering in the afterlife, surrounded by a recreation of the flowery meadow. She sees another figure approaching from the distance and rushes to embrace it… the spirit of her child, once lost and now reunited with her. THE END

In the Greek language, there are multiple words commonly used to describe different forms through which love can be expressed, including these four: Eros, Storge, Philia, and Agape: "Eros" refers to the passion to share oneself bodily with someone to initiate and nourish that unitive and procreative bond in marriage. "Storge" is commonly used to reference the natural familial bonds that parents, children, siblings, and relatives share with each other. "Philia" often refers to a cultivated friendship, usually between equals. And "Agape" often references one's love of someone for their own sake, committed as an unconditional act of the will, even to the point of laying down one's life for one's friends (John 15:13) or loving one's enemies (Matthew 5:44).

While Agape is considered the highest expression of love that emulates God the most, the previous three can offer robust foundations onto which agape can be built, as arguably demonstrated by Saint Peter’s exchange with the risen Jesus and my pop-culture example with Lula’s character arc. Bible scholars have pointed out that when the risen Jesus appears to Peter and asks if he loves Jesus three times, as a reversal of Peter's three denials, both "Philia" and "Agape" are used in an intriguing manner. The first two times Jesus asks Peter, he uses "Agape", while Peter responds with an affirmation of "Philia". Only when asking Peter the third time does he use "Philia". A common interpretation is that Peter wanted to state his love for Jesus is not yet as perfect as agape, but he does love Jesus as a friend. But Jesus shows that he is willing to meet Peter where he is currently at, so that Jesus can help elevate Peter's current level of love to a perfected state through his grace. Likewise, Lula starts out as a pawn for the coven's matriarch. The love she currently harbors is mainly the "Storge" towards her tragically lost child, and she is willing to help sacrifice Spear. However, her curiosity draws her to learn about Spear and Fang's backstories, involving the losses of their own offspring. Her empathy drives her to learn and appreciate the full value of Spear's life. Thus, a newfound agape love for Spear grows from Lula's storge love for her lost child. And Lula is even willing to stand up to her own matriarch and die for Spear, so that he can be free and live. Similar to the themes I brought up in my post on "Frankenstein", this episode of "Primal" also seems to convey an important balance, affirming both of these: that the witch coven's act used to create their children is an evil means not justified by a good end, yet the child's existence itself is still something precious and sacred that we ought to care for.

Here are some clips from the episode…

1.) Spear and Fang Come Upon Ritual:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvgWgezVuHA

2.) Full Ritual Scene:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzBD_EjJ9FA

3.) Spear and Fang Captured By Coven:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58Ifgh4U9s8

4.) Lula Visits Fang's Past:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpvXcXZs8OU

5.) Lula Visits Spear's Past:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX4I5HTBWhg

6.) Lula Revisits Her Own Past:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt06voLt0M0

7.) Lula Stands Up to Her Matriarch and Sacrifices Herself For Spear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJDAiGRQhRI

8.) Lula and Daughter Reunite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwDOcL4Cxmg

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Our response to the death of Pope Francis
00:01:29
On the Lookout for Sins of Speech - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Hello! I'm writing a book at present on sins of speech for Emmaus Road. I've been thinking a lot about cultivating healthy habits of communication, so just thought I'd share a few thoughts. Prayers for you during this Holy Week!

00:20:01
The Practice of the Presence of God - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

There are various different prayer practices that people have used in the tradition as a way of remaining in the presence of God--the practice of the presence of God (or recollection) is just one. In this video, I explain a little how it helps us to connect the dots between earthly life and heavenly realities.

00:19:43
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent
Meme Monday

… okay. This isn’t a meme. Just my heart’s deepest longing. Also I’m aware that it’s Wednesday.

post photo preview
Daniel O’Connor

Apparently, Daniel has recorded a video about me canceling him from my show. I haven’t watched it, nor will I, But I was shown a screenshot of an edited message from me to him which I think makes my communication with him seem harsher than it was. Here is his version, mine is beneath. I wish Daniel well.

April 24, 2025

I have resigned from my job. I would appreciate some prayers as I start a new phase in my life. I'll be looking for my next programming gig shortly. Thanks.

post photo preview
Candor and Charity: Reflecting on a Papacy

In a recent article by Archbishop Charles Chaput in First Things, he reflects on the legacy of Pope Francis in this moment between pontificates. He was both charitable and candid—two things we desperately need right now.

I have personal memories of Pope Francis that I greatly value: a friendly and generous working relationship at the 1997 Synod on America when we were both newly appointed archbishops; his personal welcome and warmth at Rome’s 2014 Humanum conference; and the extraordinary success of his 2015 visit to Philadelphia for the Eighth World Meeting of Families. He devoted himself to serving the Church and her people in ways that he felt the times demanded. As a brother in the faith, and a successor of Peter, he deserves our ongoing prayers for his eternal life in the presence of the God he loved.

There’s a real tenderness and respect here. And it’s a good example of how disagreement with a pontificate shouldn’t involve hostility toward the pope. Sadly—though not surprisingly—I’ve seen more than a little of that in comment sections online.

He continues:

Having said that, an interregnum between papacies is a time for candor. The lack of it, given today’s challenges, is too expensive. In many ways, whatever its strengths, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church. He had no direct involvement in the Second Vatican Council and seemed to resent the legacy of his immediate predecessors who did; men who worked and suffered to incarnate the council’s teachings faithfully into Catholic life. His personality tended toward the temperamental and autocratic. He resisted even loyal criticism. He had a pattern of ambiguity and loose words that sowed confusion and conflict.

In the face of deep cultural fractures on matters of sexual behavior and identity, he condemned gender ideology but seemed to downplay a compelling Christian “theology of the body.” He was impatient with canon law and proper procedure. His signature project, synodality, was heavy on process and deficient in clarity. Despite an inspiring outreach to society’s margins, his papacy lacked a confident, dynamic evangelical zeal. The intellectual excellence to sustain a salvific (and not merely ethical) Christian witness in a skeptical modern world was likewise absent.

What the Church needs going forward is a leader who can marry personal simplicity with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ, a leader who has a heart of courage and a keen intellect to match it. Anything less won’t work.

I love that. “A leader with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ.” Amen!

May the Holy Spirit lead the cardinals in choosing our next pope. And may Pope Francis rest in the peace

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Pope is Dead

I got a text from my sister this morning: “The pope died.” I stood there for a moment just staring at the words. I then went to the internet, thinking maybe it was a rumor or a mistake.

But it wasn’t.

Pope Francis died this morning at the age of 88. He passed away in the Casa Santa Marta, the residence inside the Vatican where he had lived since his election in 2013. He had been suffering from a number of health issues in recent years, including a recent case of pneumonia.

His death marks the end of a 12-year papacy, and now the Church enters the period known as sede vacante—the seat of Peter is vacant. Cardinals from around the world will soon gather in Rome for a conclave to elect the next pope. No one knows who it will be, but we should be praying: that the Holy Spirit guide their decision, and that the next pope be a faithful shepherd for the Church in these difficult times.

Pray this prayer with me for the soul of Pope Francis:

Eternal rest grant unto him, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon him. May his souls and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

Read full Article
post photo preview
7 Terrible Arguments For Atheism

I’ve heard plenty of arguments for atheism over the years—some thoughtful, some clever, and some… well, let’s just say I used to rattle off the worst of them back when I was an angsty 17-year-old agnostic.

Today I want to look at 7 terrible arguments for atheism—the kind that sound good at first but fall apart when you give them more than five seconds of thought.

1. "Who created God?"

This question misunderstands what Christians (and classical theists) mean by “God.” God, by definition, is uncaused—the necessary, self-existent being who causes everything else. Asking “Who created God?” is like asking “What’s north of the North Pole?” or “If your brother is a bachelor, what’s his wife’s name?” It’s a category mistake. The question only makes sense if God were a contingent being—just one more thing in the universe that needed a cause. But He isn’t. He’s the reason anything exists at all.

2. "I just believe in one less god than you."

This is clever-sounding but logically shallow. The difference between atheism and theism isn’t about the number of gods one believes in—it’s about the kind of being we’re talking about. Christians reject all finite, tribal, man-made gods too. The Christian claim is not that God is just one more being among many, but that God is Being Itself—the necessary, uncaused source of all reality. Saying, “I just believe in one less god than you,” is like saying, “I contend we’re both bachelors—I just have one less wife.” The difference between one and none isn’t minor—it’s everything. Atheism isn’t a slight variation on theism; it’s a rejection of the entire foundation of existence.

3. "Science has disproven God."

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals