Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #5: The Atomic Bomb, Godzilla’s Debut Film, and Just War Doctrine

This week has marked 79 years since the tragic and controversial bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leading up to the long awaited “Victory over Japan Day” of World War II. Given that, I figured I would delve into my favorite foreign film, 1954’s “Gojira”/“Godzilla” (the original Japanese cut). That is, while attempting to tread delicately into the sensitive subject matter which inspired it, from a Catholic perspective.

Far from the campy and escapist entertainment that many later Godzilla movies would be known for, the original 1954 film is a haunting anti-war allegory, about the horrors of nuclear warfare and other weapons of mass destruction the future might yield. To sum up the plot as briefly as possible, an ancient fire-breathing sea monster named Godzilla has been unknowingly caught in the blast of a Hydrogen bomb test. The now scarred and irradiated beast turns hostile, destroying numerous ships, terrorizing islanders, and eventually making landfall on Tokyo itself. No amount of conventional weapons like artillery and tanks can reliably repel Godzilla, and Tokyo is reduced to a burning radioactive wasteland, littered with the dead and dying. With the threat of Godzilla moving on to destroy other cities around the world, the only available solution lies in a scientist’s no-win dilemma.

One character named Dr. Daisuke Serizawa is burdened by this dilemma, having accidentally invented a new super-weapon, which is even more brutally efficient than the atomic bomb and may be the only means to kill Godzilla. Dr. Serizawa’s new weapon is barely explained, allowing it to stand in for any possible future weapon which could rival or even supersede the atomic bomb. The only clue given is that the weapon disintegrates living things around it flesh-and-all, and a crucial step of its process involves the breakdown of oxygen atoms. Given the Cold War that has begun to brew, Dr. Serizawa is terrified that the world’s regimes will seek to replicate and mass-produce his “Oxygen Destroyer”, if he reveals it. In the end, Serizawa chooses to use his weapon once and then take its secrets to his grave, by destroying all records of his research and allowing himself to die with Godzilla in the Oxygen Destroyer’s detonation. The film ends on a foreboding line, “I can't believe that Godzilla was the last of his species. If nuclear testing continues, then someday, somewhere in the world, another Godzilla may appear”.

The film’s atmosphere, spectacle, Japanese performances, and timeless messages hold up surprisingly well, and I am unashamed to say that this is one of the few movies which can still make me cry almost on command. When I revisited that film in its proper Japanese cut, while also fully understanding its subtext for the first time, it really got to me emotionally. It is one thing to simply read that people felt existential dread during the Cold War era, once the Pandora’s Box of nuclear warfare has been forever opened. It is another to actually see a work of art, which effectively conveys what that dread must have felt like, especially from the perspective of civilians who witnessed and experienced its devastating power firsthand. This kaiju monster flick puts more focus on the civilian tragedies, such as one scene of a mother facing certain death and telling the children in her arms that they will all be joining their father soon. What especially gets me a lot are its scenes which show the aftermath of Tokyo‘s destruction, the hospitals overflowing with Godzilla’s victims (including irradiated children and their dead parents), and the choir of schoolgirls singing a “Prayer for Peace”. The first two evoke much of the imagery surrounding Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s aftermath, and the third is what finally persuades Dr. Serizawa to use his weapon. Godzilla’s fury and nigh-invulnerability echo the devastation of a nuclear attack and a conventional army’s inability to protect against it. And Serizawa’s dilemma illustrates how simply having our own weapons of mass destruction to retaliate with is not enough to truly ensure peace. Paragraph #2315 of the Catechism even makes this very point.

If we as Catholics are to look back and morally evaluate the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, plus look onwards to hypothetical future uses of such weapons, it may help to first consult Catholicism’s doctrines of Just War. Paragraph #2309 of the Catechism outlines four requirements for the entering of a war to be just, one of which is that “the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition”. Onwards, “The Church and human reason assert the permanent validity of the moral law during armed conflicts. ‘The mere fact that war has regrettably broken out does not mean that everything becomes licit between the warring parties.’ Non-combatants, wounded soldiers, and prisoners must be respected and treated humanely. Practices deliberately contrary to the law of nations and to its universal principles are crimes”. In other words, besides having just grounds to declare a war, every individual act committed during said war must be morally sound and attempt to distinguish between threats and non-threats. Even if one’s actions and intents are much better compared to the enemy’s atrocities, God’s law is still the standard to abide by.

I will attempt to relay some reasons why the Catholic Church’s consensus nowadays is that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unjustified acts (while also being fair by acknowledging at least two arguments from the opposing viewpoint afterwards). Given the importance of distinguishing combatants and civilians, plus the intrinsically evil nature of murdering innocents, many apologists like Trent Horn have argued that the atomic bombings are a prime example of seeking a good end through evil means. They appear to have helped end the war sooner, seemingly leading to a lower number of American and Japanese deaths. However, those bombings were not aimed at strictly military targets. And if the method of ending the war is specifically contingent on the deaths of civilians (versus some civilians dying as an unwanted byproduct), then it sets a harmful precedent for the sanctity of innocent life and arguably becomes tantamount to terrorism. This observation seems to have influenced the Catechism’s Paragraph #2314, “‘Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation.’ A danger of modem warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons - especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons - to commit such crimes…”.

However, there are complicating circumstances to acknowledge, which may encourage us to harbor some understanding and mercy towards our forefathers, even if we find their actions to be mistaken and seek to not repeat them. Obviously, the Japanese military during WWII was infamous for idolizing Emperor Hirohito like a god, refusing to surrender, and preferring to die for their government in the name of honor. Besides the notorious kamikaze tactics, there was even a time when Hirohito did finally choose surrender, and one Japanese faction responded by attempting a coup to continue the war. It has been argued that Hirohito’s cultish hold extended to many civilians as well, who may have been willing to join in fighting American troops. If so, then perhaps it made the line between “Japanese civilians” and “Japanese combatants” appear blurrier in the eyes of America’s leaders. Though, that still does not warrant assuming all Japanese civilians are now enemies. Due to the earlier evangelization of Saint Maximilian Kolbe, for example, there was even a Catholic population in Nagasaki leading up to its bombing. Also, it is commonly brought up that some leaflets were reportedly dropped in those cities, warning people of the incoming attacks. Small as it may be, people have cited that as an attempt to at least reduce the death tolls. Other factors include similarly questionable tactics still being normalized for the time, like carpet bombing Berlin or firebombing Tokyo. Not to mention the conflicting evaluations over how many American troops were projected to die in a conventional invasion, whether Japan might have surrendered without Nagasaki’s bombing, whether the threat of Russia’s invasion could have made Hirohito surrender to America independently of the atomic bombings altogether, etc. These complicating factors, combined with someone lacking the benefit of hindsight, can contribute to the right choice being less easy to recognize and choose in the immediate time.

To end this analysis, I find the original 1954 Godzilla film to be a masterpiece, whose quality and commentary have not been matched until last year’s “Godzilla Minus One”. In each their own ways, both of these films by Toho are a reminder of how our responsibility to wage war ethically and value human life on all sides has only grown, with the new arsenals we have today. And given the current events unfolding, the world could still use another global “Prayer for Peace”.

For anyone who may want even more info, I would like to share some links to this really neat YouTube essay on the 1954 film by Steve Reviews, Apologist Trent Horn’s commentary on whether the atomic bombings were justified, the 1954 Godzilla film’s full Japanese cut on YouTube for free (for anyone using a desktop), two clips from the film, and two recordings of the “Prayer for Peace” soundtrack I love.

“Steve Reviews: Godzilla 1954 (The Original)”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwMgj8I3b2Y

Trent Horn’s “Were the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings War Crimes?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6amuetZv-eM

The Full Japanese Cut of Godzilla 1954 on YouTube For Free (Requires Desktop Device)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn-Wg1NU32I

Short Segment of Godzilla’s Rampage in Tokyo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjNYWCH-fJw

Back-to-Back Clips of the Distressed Mother, Ruined Tokyo, and Overflowing Hospitals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDDf7bnj_KM

Akira Ifukube’s “Prayer For Peace” (Original Recording for the Film)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njDSd8e6o70

“Prayer For Peace” (Kaoru Wanda’s Higher Quality Re-Recording With Added English Translations)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SowvXSmiIXo

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Why Do We Identify with Charlie Kirk? - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

In the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, many people have experienced a profound dismay. We didn't know him, and yet the events of the past week have really thrown us for a loop. Why exactly is that? And what is to be learned from the experience?

Also, I have a new book out. You can find it here: https://www.amazon.com/Your-Eucharistic-Identity-Sacramental-Fullness/dp/162164796X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2ELJ81ZJUVT1G&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.HRZlgfwsmxjGFj1ePRw-OgluBhzhKL7XiQCNKyHEK_s.V0RluCVNmFRjkIZWue1otfyktDPiZN_QnWrjE_LTPtU&dib_tag=se&keywords=your+eucharistic+identity+gregory+pine&qid=1756821967&sprefix=your+eucharistic+%2Caps%2C107&sr=8-1

00:19:09
Where Should I Live? On Cultivating Intentional Community - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

A lot of folks have to decide, at one point or another, where they are going to live and what parish they are going to attend. At times you might be torn between growing where you're planted and moving to where you're nourished. I was in Tulsa this past weekend with a really excellent community, and it sparked some though on the theme.

Also, I have a new book out. You can find it here: https://www.amazon.com/Your-Eucharistic-Identity-Sacramental-Fullness/dp/162164796X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2ELJ81ZJUVT1G&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.HRZlgfwsmxjGFj1ePRw-OgluBhzhKL7XiQCNKyHEK_s.V0RluCVNmFRjkIZWue1otfyktDPiZN_QnWrjE_LTPtU&dib_tag=se&keywords=your+eucharistic+identity+gregory+pine&qid=1756821967&sprefix=your+eucharistic+%2Caps%2C107&sr=8-1

00:19:28
September 02, 2025
WATCH: Intro to Marian Consecration

Please watch this beautiful introductory video to our 33 day preparation for total consecration to Jesus through Mary which starts September 4th. We will conclude on the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary, October 7th.

00:19:52
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

I'm so sick of the violence. In addition to all the mass shootings and assassinations in the last few months, 3 officers were fatally shot (and an additional 2 gravely wounded) yesterday in Spring Grove, PA after responding to a domestic call. This hits close to home as I only live like 20-30 mins from the area. Please pray for those killed and wounded and for their families. May God have mercy on this country.

Quote of the Day
"In the first place it should be known that if a person is seeking God, his beloved is seeking him much more."
St. John of the Cross

Today's Meditation
“Marriage releases the flesh from its individual selfishness for the service of the family; the vow of chastity releases the flesh not only from the narrow and circumscribed family, where there can still be selfishness, but also for the service of that family that embraces all humanity. That is why the Church asks those who consecrate themselves to the redemption of the world to take a vow and to surrender all selfishness, that ...

post photo preview
14 hours ago

Last time I smoked a cigar on the porch I wrote a poem for my wife. This time I tried inspirational notes for her mirror. How’d I do?

post photo preview

My dear friends, I have an unusual and urgent request to please spread the word if you can. I hope this is okay. This sweet priest could use a very special prayer to find a living donor. frjcgarrettneeds a kidney. com 732-757-6765 🙏 He is in NJ. God bless you!

post photo preview
post photo preview
What St. Thomas Means by "Curiosity"

In today's livestream I spoke about the sin of curiosity. In this article, I thought I'd sum it up for you in case I didn't do it well in the livestream.

You can read Thomas' own words here, btw. 

For Aquinas, “curiosity” is not simply the healthy desire to know the truth. He distinguishes between the virtue of studiositas—the ordered pursuit of knowledge—and the vice of curiositas, which is the disordered pursuit of knowledge.

Curiosity becomes a vice when we seek knowledge in the wrong way or for the wrong reasons: for pride, idle speculation, gossip, or knowledge that leads us away from God rather than toward Him. For example, indulging in occult practices, probing into sinful matters for fascination, or prying into things that are none of our business (all of social media, or just most?) are all ways that curiosity corrupts the good of knowledge. In other words, knowledge itself is good, but the way we desire, seek, and use it can be distorted.

Aquinas says that curiosity can show itself in several ways: when someone prefers trivial knowledge over what would truly benefit their soul (c'mon ... this is how many people live their lives), when one seeks knowledge to boast or to sin, when one is distracted by an endless hunger for new information at the expense of wisdom, or when one turns to forbidden sources of knowledge.

By contrast, the virtue of studiousness disciplines the intellect so that we seek truth for its own sake, for God’s glory, and for the service of others. Thus, Aquinas sees curiosity not as the love of learning itself, but as the disorder of that love—an appetite for knowing that forgets the proper end of knowledge, which is to lead us to truth and ultimately to God.

So here's a challenge for you and me: What is one practical way that we can avoid curiosity and grow in studiousness?

Read full Article
post photo preview
33 Days of Preparation for Marian Consecration on Locals – Starts Sept 4

Hey everyone!

Beginning September 4th, our Locals community will enter into 33 days of spiritual preparation for total consecration to Jesus through Mary. 

We will conclude together on October 7th, the Feast of Our Lady of the Holy Rosary.

Here’s how it will unfold on Locals:

- We will be guided by Fr. Boniface Hicks’ beautiful book, The Fruit of Her Womb: 33-Day Preparation for Total Consecration to Jesus Through Mary. (I’ve received special permission from the publisher to share it with Locals members.)

- A daily meditation and prayer will be posted each day for the 33 days.

- To accompany us, Fr. Boniface will provide several exclusive videos recorded just for Locals, offering guidance and encouragement along the way.

This is an opportunity to consecrate—or renew your consecration—to Jesus through Mary in the company of a prayerful community, with the wisdom of a priest who has written deeply on this devotion.

Mark your calendar: We begin September 4th.

You can purchase a copy of the book here: https://www.amazon.com/33-Day-Preparation-Total-Consecration-Through/dp/1644138409

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Practical Method For Spiritual Warfare
 
In this article, I want to suggest a powerful, practical method for spiritual warfare—one that I believe will be a game-changer in your everyday life. We'll explore how consistently announcing what is true and renouncing what is false can become a potent weapon, helping you navigate the unseen battles that often manifest as struggles in our thoughts and emotions.
 
At the Catholic Easter Vigil Mass, there is a significant moment where the congregation renews their Baptismal Promises.

In essence, the priest leads the faithful to announce what is true and to renounce what is false.

For the purposes of this article we’ll begin with the questions that invite annunciations. He asks:

"Do you believe in God, the Father almighty, Creator of heaven and earth?"

"Do you believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord, who was born of the Virgin Mary, suffered death and was buried, rose again from the dead and is seated at the right hand of the Father?"

"Do you believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting?"

In responding “I do” to these questions, we are in a very real sense aligning ourselves with reality. While emotions may be present, they don’t need to be. Simply stating our agreement with the way things are is enough.

Prior to the above questions are a series of questions which invite renunciation:

"Do you renounce sin, so as to live in the freedom of the children of God?"

"Do you renounce the lure of evil, so that sin may have no mastery over you?"

"Do you renounce Satan, the author and prince of sin?"

In responding “I do” to these questions, we are renouncing, repudiating, what is false.

To those who may attend Holy Mass once or twice a year they may be surprised to discover just how seriously the Church takes the reality of the Devil and spiritual warfare. But anyone somewhat familiar with the Scriptures and the consistent teaching of the Church would not be. Here I could dump a multitude of Scriptural verses proving my point, but one will suffice. From the first letter of St. Peter:

"Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. Resist him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same kinds of suffering are being experienced by your brotherhood throughout the world."

And now for the main point of this article: Just as it is beneficial to regularly align ourselves with what is true (say through an act of faith), it is also beneficial to regularly repudiate, and disassociate with, what is false.

And given that our lives are situated squarely within a world at war. A world which “lies in the power of the evil one.” in which demonic forces are seeking to blind us to the things of God (2 Cor. 4:4). This is something we are going to be needing to do in one form or another on a daily basis. Multiple times a day.

Let me offer a personal anecdote that will illustrate this. I was about to interview someone on a topic that I knew would get blowback from the Demonic realm. I was going on a walk praying my rosary before my guest arrived. While I was walking I slowly became aware of a sort of oppressive force. I felt sad and restricted, somehow. Anxious. I’m not sure how long I was feeling that way, but at any rate I didn’t become conscious of it until that moment. I stopped walking and tried to sum up what I was experiencing in a word. It clicked. intimidation. That’s was it. I felt intimidated. And so I said the following prayer:

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals