Matt Fradd
Spirituality/Belief • Books • Writing
This PWA community exists to facilitate an online community of PWA listeners and all lovers of philosophy and theology.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Pop-Cultured Catholic #5: The Atomic Bomb, Godzilla’s Debut Film, and Just War Doctrine

This week has marked 79 years since the tragic and controversial bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, leading up to the long awaited “Victory over Japan Day” of World War II. Given that, I figured I would delve into my favorite foreign film, 1954’s “Gojira”/“Godzilla” (the original Japanese cut). That is, while attempting to tread delicately into the sensitive subject matter which inspired it, from a Catholic perspective.

Far from the campy and escapist entertainment that many later Godzilla movies would be known for, the original 1954 film is a haunting anti-war allegory, about the horrors of nuclear warfare and other weapons of mass destruction the future might yield. To sum up the plot as briefly as possible, an ancient fire-breathing sea monster named Godzilla has been unknowingly caught in the blast of a Hydrogen bomb test. The now scarred and irradiated beast turns hostile, destroying numerous ships, terrorizing islanders, and eventually making landfall on Tokyo itself. No amount of conventional weapons like artillery and tanks can reliably repel Godzilla, and Tokyo is reduced to a burning radioactive wasteland, littered with the dead and dying. With the threat of Godzilla moving on to destroy other cities around the world, the only available solution lies in a scientist’s no-win dilemma.

One character named Dr. Daisuke Serizawa is burdened by this dilemma, having accidentally invented a new super-weapon, which is even more brutally efficient than the atomic bomb and may be the only means to kill Godzilla. Dr. Serizawa’s new weapon is barely explained, allowing it to stand in for any possible future weapon which could rival or even supersede the atomic bomb. The only clue given is that the weapon disintegrates living things around it flesh-and-all, and a crucial step of its process involves the breakdown of oxygen atoms. Given the Cold War that has begun to brew, Dr. Serizawa is terrified that the world’s regimes will seek to replicate and mass-produce his “Oxygen Destroyer”, if he reveals it. In the end, Serizawa chooses to use his weapon once and then take its secrets to his grave, by destroying all records of his research and allowing himself to die with Godzilla in the Oxygen Destroyer’s detonation. The film ends on a foreboding line, “I can't believe that Godzilla was the last of his species. If nuclear testing continues, then someday, somewhere in the world, another Godzilla may appear”.

The film’s atmosphere, spectacle, Japanese performances, and timeless messages hold up surprisingly well, and I am unashamed to say that this is one of the few movies which can still make me cry almost on command. When I revisited that film in its proper Japanese cut, while also fully understanding its subtext for the first time, it really got to me emotionally. It is one thing to simply read that people felt existential dread during the Cold War era, once the Pandora’s Box of nuclear warfare has been forever opened. It is another to actually see a work of art, which effectively conveys what that dread must have felt like, especially from the perspective of civilians who witnessed and experienced its devastating power firsthand. This kaiju monster flick puts more focus on the civilian tragedies, such as one scene of a mother facing certain death and telling the children in her arms that they will all be joining their father soon. What especially gets me a lot are its scenes which show the aftermath of Tokyo‘s destruction, the hospitals overflowing with Godzilla’s victims (including irradiated children and their dead parents), and the choir of schoolgirls singing a “Prayer for Peace”. The first two evoke much of the imagery surrounding Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s aftermath, and the third is what finally persuades Dr. Serizawa to use his weapon. Godzilla’s fury and nigh-invulnerability echo the devastation of a nuclear attack and a conventional army’s inability to protect against it. And Serizawa’s dilemma illustrates how simply having our own weapons of mass destruction to retaliate with is not enough to truly ensure peace. Paragraph #2315 of the Catechism even makes this very point.

If we as Catholics are to look back and morally evaluate the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, plus look onwards to hypothetical future uses of such weapons, it may help to first consult Catholicism’s doctrines of Just War. Paragraph #2309 of the Catechism outlines four requirements for the entering of a war to be just, one of which is that “the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition”. Onwards, “The Church and human reason assert the permanent validity of the moral law during armed conflicts. ‘The mere fact that war has regrettably broken out does not mean that everything becomes licit between the warring parties.’ Non-combatants, wounded soldiers, and prisoners must be respected and treated humanely. Practices deliberately contrary to the law of nations and to its universal principles are crimes”. In other words, besides having just grounds to declare a war, every individual act committed during said war must be morally sound and attempt to distinguish between threats and non-threats. Even if one’s actions and intents are much better compared to the enemy’s atrocities, God’s law is still the standard to abide by.

I will attempt to relay some reasons why the Catholic Church’s consensus nowadays is that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unjustified acts (while also being fair by acknowledging at least two arguments from the opposing viewpoint afterwards). Given the importance of distinguishing combatants and civilians, plus the intrinsically evil nature of murdering innocents, many apologists like Trent Horn have argued that the atomic bombings are a prime example of seeking a good end through evil means. They appear to have helped end the war sooner, seemingly leading to a lower number of American and Japanese deaths. However, those bombings were not aimed at strictly military targets. And if the method of ending the war is specifically contingent on the deaths of civilians (versus some civilians dying as an unwanted byproduct), then it sets a harmful precedent for the sanctity of innocent life and arguably becomes tantamount to terrorism. This observation seems to have influenced the Catechism’s Paragraph #2314, “‘Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation.’ A danger of modem warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons - especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons - to commit such crimes…”.

However, there are complicating circumstances to acknowledge, which may encourage us to harbor some understanding and mercy towards our forefathers, even if we find their actions to be mistaken and seek to not repeat them. Obviously, the Japanese military during WWII was infamous for idolizing Emperor Hirohito like a god, refusing to surrender, and preferring to die for their government in the name of honor. Besides the notorious kamikaze tactics, there was even a time when Hirohito did finally choose surrender, and one Japanese faction responded by attempting a coup to continue the war. It has been argued that Hirohito’s cultish hold extended to many civilians as well, who may have been willing to join in fighting American troops. If so, then perhaps it made the line between “Japanese civilians” and “Japanese combatants” appear blurrier in the eyes of America’s leaders. Though, that still does not warrant assuming all Japanese civilians are now enemies. Due to the earlier evangelization of Saint Maximilian Kolbe, for example, there was even a Catholic population in Nagasaki leading up to its bombing. Also, it is commonly brought up that some leaflets were reportedly dropped in those cities, warning people of the incoming attacks. Small as it may be, people have cited that as an attempt to at least reduce the death tolls. Other factors include similarly questionable tactics still being normalized for the time, like carpet bombing Berlin or firebombing Tokyo. Not to mention the conflicting evaluations over how many American troops were projected to die in a conventional invasion, whether Japan might have surrendered without Nagasaki’s bombing, whether the threat of Russia’s invasion could have made Hirohito surrender to America independently of the atomic bombings altogether, etc. These complicating factors, combined with someone lacking the benefit of hindsight, can contribute to the right choice being less easy to recognize and choose in the immediate time.

To end this analysis, I find the original 1954 Godzilla film to be a masterpiece, whose quality and commentary have not been matched until last year’s “Godzilla Minus One”. In each their own ways, both of these films by Toho are a reminder of how our responsibility to wage war ethically and value human life on all sides has only grown, with the new arsenals we have today. And given the current events unfolding, the world could still use another global “Prayer for Peace”.

For anyone who may want even more info, I would like to share some links to this really neat YouTube essay on the 1954 film by Steve Reviews, Apologist Trent Horn’s commentary on whether the atomic bombings were justified, the 1954 Godzilla film’s full Japanese cut on YouTube for free (for anyone using a desktop), two clips from the film, and two recordings of the “Prayer for Peace” soundtrack I love.

“Steve Reviews: Godzilla 1954 (The Original)”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwMgj8I3b2Y

Trent Horn’s “Were the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombings War Crimes?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6amuetZv-eM

The Full Japanese Cut of Godzilla 1954 on YouTube For Free (Requires Desktop Device)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn-Wg1NU32I

Short Segment of Godzilla’s Rampage in Tokyo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjNYWCH-fJw

Back-to-Back Clips of the Distressed Mother, Ruined Tokyo, and Overflowing Hospitals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDDf7bnj_KM

Akira Ifukube’s “Prayer For Peace” (Original Recording for the Film)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njDSd8e6o70

“Prayer For Peace” (Kaoru Wanda’s Higher Quality Re-Recording With Added English Translations)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SowvXSmiIXo

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
New Intros for Interviews. Feedback Please.

Over the past couple of years, we’ve been releasing 10 clips a week, along with a long-form interview. Well now we’re making a shift that we believe will be more impactful. Moving forward, we’ll be experimenting with just five clips a week, but making those 5 (hopefully) exceptional. Additionally, we’re putting more focus on the introductions to our interviews. Here’s the intro for my upcoming interview with John Henry Spann, which will be available on Locals this week and on YouTube next week.

00:01:28
Principles for Theistic Decision-Making - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

Principles for Theistic Decision-Making - Fr. Gregory Pine, O.P.

In this installment of spiritual direction, we'll consider how to make good decisions. A lot of us have it in our minds that 1) God has a perfect plan, that 2) we're responsible for figuring it out, and that 3) if we don't, we total failures. I want to refine our understanding of these choices, so that we can be about the business of living our lives well : )

00:20:08
Our response to the death of Pope Francis
00:01:29
Simple NEW Lofi Song

Working on an entire album of lofi music. Here's one of those songs. Album should drop next week. THEN, a couple of weeks after that we hope to have our 24/7 stream up and running.

Simple NEW Lofi Song
December 01, 2022
Day 5 of Advent

THE ERROR OF ARIUS ABOUT THE INCARNATION

In their eagerness to proclaim the unity of God and man in Christ, some heretics went to the opposite extreme and taught that not only was there one person, but also a single nature, in God and man. This error took its rise from Arius. To defend his position that those scriptural passages where Christ is represented as being inferior to the Father, must refer to the Son of God Himself, regarded in His assuming nature, Arius taught that in Christ there is no other soul than the Word of God who, he maintained, took the place of the soul in Christ’s body. Thus when Christ says, in John 14:28, “The Father is greater than I,” or when He is introduced as praying or as being sad, such matters are to be referred to the very nature of the Son of God. If this were so, the union of God’s Son with man would be effected not only in the person, but also in the nature. For, as we know, the unity of human nature arises from the union of soul and body.

The...

Day 5 of Advent
November 27, 2022
Day 1 of Advent

RESTORATION OF MAN BY GOD THROUGH THE INCARNATION

We indicated above that the reparation of human nature could not be effected either by Adam or by any other purely human being. For no individual man ever occupied a position of pre-eminence over the whole of nature; nor can any mere man be the cause of grace. The same reasoning shows that not even an angel could be the author of man’s restoration. An angel cannot be the cause of grace, just as he cannot be man’s recompense with regard to the ultimate perfection of beatitude, to which man was to be recalled. In this matter of beatitude angels and men are on a footing of equality. Nothing remains, therefore, but that such restoration could be effected by God alone.

But if God had decided to restore man solely by an act of His will and power, the order of divine justice would not have been observed. justice demands satisfaction for sin. But God cannot render satisfaction, just as He cannot merit. Such a service pertains to one who ...

Day 1 of Advent

Quick update, baby Shepherd is out of the NICU and his older brother Walker is in love. Thank you all for your prayers. We will be going home tomorrow. God is good.

post photo preview

So I got a Pope on my birthday today. And to make it even more special, my sweet wife has been working on an icon for me: The Presentation of Christ in the Temple—Hypapante.

The pictures don’t do it justice. It’s solid, hardy, and masculine, with deep-stained wooden sides. She’s so talented.

In the icon, St. Joseph carries the two doves offered in the Temple. They represent more than ritual—they symbolize the offering of his whole life in service to Jesus and Mary.

I love the vibrant color pattern—especially the turquoise, one of my favorites—and how she included several of St. Joseph’s titles. “Protector of the Church” especially stands out.

I’ll always remember this icon—and Pope Leo XIV, who was elected the same day it was completed.

Through St. Joseph’s intercession, I’m praying for the grace to lead my domestic church—and for the new Pope as he shepherds the universal Church.

post photo preview
13 hours ago

Lots of opinions all of the sudden. I did not know who Cardinal Prevost was yesterday. I won't presume to know who Pope Leo XIV is today. I think I'm going to unplug. Let's all just pray for the man, the Church, and each other. We follow Christ, and he promised us a Church that would prevail. That promise has never been broken. We have the Sacraments. We have the Eucharist. What more do we want this side of heaven?

post photo preview
Welcome to Locals!

A big and hearty welcome to all who have joined our Locals community!

Here's what to expect:

  1.  Interviews one week early (before they hit Youtube)
  2. The opportunity to ask my guests questions
  3. Exclusive biweekly spiritual direction videos from Fr. Pine
  4. Access to video courses such as:
  • 7 part series on St. Augustine's Confessions by Dr Chad Engelland (here).
  • 5 Part series on Salvation History by Dr Andrew Swafford (here).
  • 5 Part series on Flannery O'Connor by Fr Damian Ferrence (here).
  • 6 Part series on Love and Responsibility by Christopher West & Matt Fradd (here).
  • 5 Part Series o Aquinas' 5 ways by Dr. Ed Feser (here).

5. Occasional livestreams with me.

6. Knowing that you're supporting the work of Pints With Aquinas.

Thanks!

Read full Article
3 Medium Sized Announcements!

Hey friends,

If you’re new here—welcome. Really. I know it sounds cliché, but I mean it: I couldn’t do any of this without your support, and I’m deeply grateful for it.

Alright, here’s a quick update on what’s coming up:

Starting June 1st, my family and I will be heading to Austria for two and a half months. While we’re there, I’ll be working on three major projects that I’m really excited about:

1. A Pints With Aquinas App

I could go on and on about this, but I’ll restrain myself—for now. Just know it’s coming, and it’s going to be awesome. As a Locals supporter, you’ll get access to everything inside the app (and yes, it’ll include even more than what’s currently on Locals). We want to release it at the beginning of 2026.

2. A Book: Jesus Our Refuge

This is a book I’ve felt called to write for years, and a recent conversation with John Eldredge finally pushed me over the edge. Here’s the part I’m most excited about: this book won’t earn me a cent.
Instead, I’ll be hosting events—both in the U.S. and internationally—where every single person who attends will receive a copy for free. It’s a message I want in as many hands as possible.

Here's a rough concept for the front cover:

a rough draft of the book cover

3. A New Book of Socratic Dialogues

A publisher (I’ll keep the name quiet for now) has invited me to write a book of Socratic dialogues making the case that Christianity is true. If you’ve enjoyed the dialogues I have published from time to time here and on Substack, you'll love this.

Now, if you’re anything like me, lying in a chair doing nothing sounds nice—for about 10 minutes. I need structure and rhythm. So while in Austria, I’ll be spending my mornings writing and working with those who will help develop the app.

That’s the plan. Thanks again for being here.

More soon,
Matt

Read full Article
post photo preview
Candor and Charity: Reflecting on a Papacy

In a recent article by Archbishop Charles Chaput in First Things, he reflects on the legacy of Pope Francis in this moment between pontificates. He was both charitable and candid—two things we desperately need right now.

I have personal memories of Pope Francis that I greatly value: a friendly and generous working relationship at the 1997 Synod on America when we were both newly appointed archbishops; his personal welcome and warmth at Rome’s 2014 Humanum conference; and the extraordinary success of his 2015 visit to Philadelphia for the Eighth World Meeting of Families. He devoted himself to serving the Church and her people in ways that he felt the times demanded. As a brother in the faith, and a successor of Peter, he deserves our ongoing prayers for his eternal life in the presence of the God he loved.

There’s a real tenderness and respect here. And it’s a good example of how disagreement with a pontificate shouldn’t involve hostility toward the pope. Sadly—though not surprisingly—I’ve seen more than a little of that in comment sections online.

He continues:

Having said that, an interregnum between papacies is a time for candor. The lack of it, given today’s challenges, is too expensive. In many ways, whatever its strengths, the Francis pontificate was inadequate to the real issues facing the Church. He had no direct involvement in the Second Vatican Council and seemed to resent the legacy of his immediate predecessors who did; men who worked and suffered to incarnate the council’s teachings faithfully into Catholic life. His personality tended toward the temperamental and autocratic. He resisted even loyal criticism. He had a pattern of ambiguity and loose words that sowed confusion and conflict.

In the face of deep cultural fractures on matters of sexual behavior and identity, he condemned gender ideology but seemed to downplay a compelling Christian “theology of the body.” He was impatient with canon law and proper procedure. His signature project, synodality, was heavy on process and deficient in clarity. Despite an inspiring outreach to society’s margins, his papacy lacked a confident, dynamic evangelical zeal. The intellectual excellence to sustain a salvific (and not merely ethical) Christian witness in a skeptical modern world was likewise absent.

What the Church needs going forward is a leader who can marry personal simplicity with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ, a leader who has a heart of courage and a keen intellect to match it. Anything less won’t work.

I love that. “A leader with a passion for converting the world to Jesus Christ.” Amen!

May the Holy Spirit lead the cardinals in choosing our next pope. And may Pope Francis rest in the peace

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals